Preview

GoldmanSachsGoingToTheOracle

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
385 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
GoldmanSachsGoingToTheOracle
Going to the Oracle: Goldman Sachs, September 2008
1. Description of the situation

Goldman Sachs, one of the most important financial institutions in the US suffered from the historic financial crisis in 2008, particularly because of the demise of insurer AIG given the systemic disruption in the markets and the collateral damage provoked by trading operations with AIG.

Even if the company had a strong record in risk management avoiding market downturns, this situation caused Goldman Sachs stock price to to decrease and banks stopped lending money even among them.

The company raised $5 billion from Warren Buffett through Berkshire Hathaway, which triggered the influx of $5.75 more in common stock from the public market. 2. Why did Goldman raise capital when it did?
Goldman Sachs decided to convert to a banking holding company, which would allow it to have more stability and liquidity through the Federal Reserve, with more regulations and protection.
Goldman was short in capital supply and it needed to increase its capital base to improve the liquidity of the company at the time of the crisis and the weak market conditions.
Very importantly, they needed to restore market confidence and getting the capital from Warren Buffett, easily the most respected investor, would give an endorsement and validation from the ‘Oracle of Omaha’, diminishing any doubt about Goldman Sachs liquidity position.

3. At the end of Q3 2008 was Goldman over or under capitalized?

At the end of Q3 2008, the company was Over-Capitalized.

4. Who got the better deal? Buffett or Goldman?
Warren Buffett got the better deal 50,000 shares of cumulative perpetual preferred stock with a liquidation value of $100,000 per share and a 10% annual dividend. He got the option to buy stock at a discounted price: warrants to buy $5 billion of common stock for $115 a share at any time in the next five years. Basically, just by buying stock he would be able to get his investment back fairly easy.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bear Stearns Case Summary

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    reputation as one of the most aggressive traders on Wall Street and like his predecessors he…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inside the Meltdown

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two largest mortgage lenders in the world, lost 60% of their stock value in July 2008. The government fired the management and the feds took over both companies. Then in the beginning of September, Lehman Brothers, another investment bank, had their stock dropping quickly. It was once again toxic investments that once made them money before, but now was responsible for their company plummeting. The government would not intervene with Lehman and they let them fail. It turned out that Lehman Brothers was even more interconnected than anybody thought. Because of Lehman’s bankruptcy, no one could get a loan and everything freezes. The meltdown had begun.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ocenaography

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a. In September 2008 the bankruptcy of Lehmann Brothers and the collapse of AIG led to the onset of the financial crisis which doubled the U.S. national debt and rendered 30 million people unemployed…

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2008 Financial Crisis

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages

    As Secretary of Treasury, Hank Paulson’s lax supervision let too many subprime mortgage bonds get into the market. The investment banks purchased this big short, which was like a time bomb. This was the environment, which Mr. Paulson created to lead up to the financial crisis. In March 2008, the Wall Street fifth investment bank, Bear Sterns, got trouble, as it set foot in subprime mortgage market and the real estate bubble began to burst. Because of the ability to figure out the problem, Bear Sterns was the first one to have the liquidity crisis so that the whole market panic. Fed reserve and DOF decided to let J.P. Morgan purchased Bear Sterns, and Fed Reserve paid more on the loss, which we call the government gave Wall Street the bailout. And then, as the collateral economy, the third and fourth investment banks, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch, got trouble some days later. As government was facing serious pubic duties for the bailout last time, they decided not to help Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch and gave a hand to the other Wall Street financial companies to merge them to ride out this financial storm. Unfortunately, BOA was more interested in Merrill Lynch. Lehman Brothers had to seek the other company to get help. Barclays tried to merge Lehman Brothers, but British decided to give up this deal at the last critical moment so that Lehman Brothers had no choice to apply for bankruptcy before the stock market opened on Monday.…

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Inside Job

    • 1002 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the reasons for the crisis was because of immoral decisions. After The Great Depression the industry was tightly regulated. Everything was fine for 40 year’s up until the 1980’s when Don Reagan, newly appointed Treasury Secretary and former Meryl Lynch CEO, pushed for deregulation. Without oversight, companies such as Meryl Lynch, and others like Goldman Sachs, started making risky investments. This is one of the reasons why the film made me angry, but also helped me realize what actually happened. We saw these companies start to become huge and gain more power, which in turn was one reason that led to the financial crisis. In my eyes they are responsible for some of the wrongdoings because if we were still regulated, the chances of the financial crisis would have been slimmer.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the banks first created the swaps, it gave investors the opportunity to invest in bank loans. From there, banks sold derivatives on all portfolios by synthetic investment. Investors were able to invest in credit default swap and make it grow. Credit then became a more available asset which stroke employment. Now all banks wanted credit derivatives; which are privately held negotiable contracts that allow consumers to manage their exposure to credit risk. The main problem with this was they assumed risk could be eliminated, but it couldn’t. In order to regulate derivatives, Congress passed the Glass-Steagall Act in 1933 to establish deposit insurance, and implemented a number of banking regulations. As learning in class, this affected every business in America. There was now a high rating, and high yield. The big return was bankers now bought bundled mortgages. Homebuyers were able to pay double, but lending was too much; making people going bankrupt in home mortgages. Borrowers gave loans greater than the value of that loan, which made the financial bubble burst, creating a recession. With bankers ignoring all the possible risks from the beginning, they feel into a deep crash. Goldman Sachs was the only bank to…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Northern Rock’ Crisis

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The bank went to FTSE 100 index in 2000. However it was downgrade to FTSE250 in December 2007 because the crisis that has been faced. The bank caught crisis by subprime mortgage financial crisis that happen at US. Consequence of the crisis, the bank has credit markets problems. It need more cash to support their running business. It received liquidity support facility from Bank of England. The reasons bank get into crisis because the subprime mortgage that have been face by Lehman Brothers. The bank had moved to make a deal with Lehman Brother before, which the risk was being underwritten by Lehman Brothers.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glass Steagall Act

    • 3028 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Commercial banks were accused of being too speculative in the pre-Depression era, not only because they were investing their assets but also because they were buying new issues for resale to the public. Thus, banks became greedy, taking on huge risks in the hope of even bigger rewards. Banking itself became sloppy and objectives became blurred. Unsound loans were issued to companies in which the bank had invested, and clients would be encouraged to invest in those same stocks.…

    • 3028 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, Goldman Sachs and other big banks such as Morgan Stanley, and JPMorgan Chase have been pushing their way into the commodity business by buying warehouses, oil refineries, power plants, and other physical infrastructure. According to an article by The Editorial Board from the New York Times, Goldman Sachs’s Aluminum Pile, “They have been able to do so because American lawmakers and regulators have removed many of the barriers that historically separated banking and commerce.” The banks involved and supporters claim they should be allowed to buy sell commodities on a large scale because it is closely related to their trading activities, however, the banks could take an unfair upper hand using their knowledge in the physical market to assist them when trading in the finance market with Exchange Traded Funds.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What happened: With insufficient cash flow, the bank decreased its investments. In the mean time, worse financial condition led to a decrease in stock price and retained earnings.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Warren Buffet

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. Critically assess Buffett’s investment philosophy. Be prepared to identify points where you agree and disagree with him.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral Hazard

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    So the banks favored the short-term profitability without thinking of the long term consequences of their decisions because they were convinced they could not fall. The banks then took advantage of their importance and jeopardized the entire economy…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Assignment econometrics

    • 41688 Words
    • 167 Pages

    15. ^ Wall Street in crisis: Last banks standing give up investment bank status, The Guardian, September 22, 2008…

    • 41688 Words
    • 167 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ATSC Case

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Did Goldman Sacks had enough capital to grow? Can it grow faster eough to retain its position?…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In early September 2008, there was considerable credit crunch and difficulties in obtaining interbank loans, though the prize on American Treasuries in the commercial paper market and the interbank was below the average of the previous year. The demise of Bear Stearns by its acquisition by J.P. Morgan had established the view that there were financial organisations that were too big to fail, like investment banks. Creditors recovered money and were just punished shareholders, who recovered less than 10% of a year before actions had. Therefore, he evaded the deepening of systemic hazard, but evading moral risk of shareholders. This condition transformed considerably on September 15 after the liquidation of Lehman Brothers investment bank; it…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays