Preview

Good and Bad Reasons for Believing: Philosophical Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1107 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Good and Bad Reasons for Believing: Philosophical Analysis
In the article “Good and Bad Reasons for Believing”, Richard Dawkins argues that you should only believe something once it has been proven by evidence. He also claims that tradition, authority and revelation are three bad reasons to believe something. In this paper I will critically analyse Dawkins’ theory and explain why I agree with his viewpoint as described in the article. Dawkins argues that the appeal to tradition, authority and revelation are fallacies. Unless backed by evidence, they are not good arguments and can’t be trusted blindly. The only way to be certain that something is true is through observation, either personal or by someone who has seen/heard/felt it personally. He stipulates that it is okay to trust authority without personally seeing evidence, as long as “anyone is free to look at the evidence whenever they want”. Dawkins concludes by saying that when confronted with a claim, it is smart to step back and reflect on why people believe it before deciding whether to believe it yourself. Evidence is a valid reason to believe something because once something has been proven through observation, it cannot be argued. It is simply fact, according to Dawkins. On the other hand, when a claim is justified by tradition, authority or revelation there is still room for opinion and argument. When a fact can be argued, it is unfounded and therefore is not a fact at all. In the case of tradition, Dawkins explains that often traditions (specifically religions) stem from stories written long ago that were passed down through generations. Somewhere along the way, they began to be construed as fact, but there is no way of knowing for certain who originally believed them and whether they had evidence or even if they were meant to be taken seriously at all. He then rationalizes that the appeal to authority is fallacy because being in an authoritative position does not make a person all-knowing, nor does it mean that they are always right. Without evidence,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    James Patrick Holding’s article talks about how “demagogues” like Dawkins find it hard to believe that creationists’ views are accepted and the double standard shown by them in accepting a thesis. The author seems to be offended as indicated by how he can mention “a lengthy list of the insulting rhetoric Dawkins has heaped upon the creationists”. Holding questions the credibility of the beliefs supported by Dawkins, who seems to be raising doubts on the view point of the creationists because the view belongs to a minority alone. Holding believes that people like Dawkins rarely put an effort in researching a particular idea, but they add those beliefs in their “agenda” only if it proves to be beneficial for them. The readers get the hint of irony that Holding tries to convey through his article that even though Dawkins supports the ‘Christ myth’ through his actions, he happens to give a statement of how there is a possibility of the existence of Jesus. The mockery in the article is pretty obvious as first Dawkins is said to have worked in a film called “The God Who Wasn’t There” – a film that supports the idea of how Jesus did not even exist at all. The author further mentions how the “Christ Myth” remains unsupported by any of the historians and the “leading proponent of Christ myth over the past century – is not a historian, but a professor of German”. The readers begin to doubt the credibility of Dawkins after reading this article and whether he and his “ideological cohorts” actually care to research a prevalent idea before they declare their endorsement of it. Even though people like Dawkins make sure their beliefs are free from any kind of doubts, most of the readers would definitely become cautious in believing the claims of these people after reading this…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “One Side Can Be Wrong,” Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne argue that teaching creationism along side evolution does not make sense, and that creationism has no business being in the science classes. Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne are evolutionary biologists at Oxford University and the University of Chicago. They published this essay in the Guardian in September 2005, seeking to appeal to middle-aged parents. They argue that creationism cannot provide any positive evidence to create a controversy and therefore should not be taught in schools to children and teenagers. On the other hand, there is a substantial amount of evidence for evolution where debate and conversation can arise.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “People believe things they have been told to”. Dawkins claimed that it is unrealistic to suggest there is a life after death without any empirical evidence; people have created this false analogy that there is something more out there without much evidence. Seeing as there is no God and no one has seen him clearly suggested to Dawkins that there isn’t one and the religious ideas surrounding life after death are falsifiable. To him the afterlife was that of a “delusion of the next world”. Dawkins was a very intelligent man and to him belief in the afterlife was illogical and implausible. He claimed life was no more than DNA reproducing itself. Are his claims surrounding life after death not realistic when we take empirical evidence in to account?…

    • 2679 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    William K. Clifford sets out to show in “The Ethics of Belief” that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence…” In this paper, I will show that his argument lacks key definitions needed in order to found his inference upon and that it begs the question as to what qualifies as “insufficient” evidence. Furthermore, I will show that the primary issue is not the belief but the results of the belief that is important and that all judgment and interpretation should be based upon said results.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unlike Richard Dawkins, Edith Hamilton’s book gives the myths a chance of redemption as the explanations as to why things exist the way they…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The verification principle is a significant concept used by many philosophers in order to determine whether a religious statement is meaningful or not. This was highly influenced by logical positivism: group of 20th century philosophers called the Vienna circle and was then further developed by British philosopher A.J Ayer. Religious language refer to statements such as ‘God exists’ and ‘God loves me’. Whilst these metaphysical claims are often rendered as meaningless by verificationism, one must take into account the strengths and weaknesses.…

    • 989 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brian D. Mclaren continues the rest of the spiritual journey in “Finding Faith: Search for What is Real”, the introduction and chapters of this book is a continuation of his first book “Finding Faith: A Search for What Makes Sense”. Mclaren’s in his forst book tells the readers about God’s existence and how good faith is real and humble; in his second book he continue his faith journey by explaining to the readers ways to sort through concerns that arise when Considering God as a friend we connect with. The book starts with a foreword by Steve Chalke, The short story is about a dream. The dream is Jesus coming back to earth in the sixteenth century and get arrested by inquisitor then told he will be killed.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book acknowledges that this discipline is overwhelmingly secular. Because of this, science tries to leave out God as creator and the ultimate answer to difficult questions. Accordingly, the author does not suggest that all scientific thought and testing be discarded, rather science confirms what we know about God.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He solely bases his beliefs on the quantity of evidence held by each side, using scientific evidence when regarding evolution and biblical literalism when regarding creationism. Dawkins from his statement concludes that based on his studies, all the evidence points towards evolution, implying that the Bible or any other religious book or testament is not a sufficient amount of data to conclude that the belief that life was created by a divine being is legitimate. Furthermore, Dawkins’ argument is captivating by distinctly claiming that he believes in one side over the other, averting from flaw of the “Integration” model, where science and religion can be basically unified as if they were in the same field of study. Additionally, Dawkins mentions the lack of evidence creationism has which can be compared to a film in which a character had the same problem,…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science has had a huge impact on society in the past few centuries with medicines curing disastrous diseases and the growing success of technology. This success has led to a widespread belief in science; believing science can deliver well to the people in society. However, this success has been dimmed by science causing problems; for example global warming and pollution as these are both products of science. However the good and bad effects of science show features distinguishing it from other belief systems as it enables us to explain predict and control the world in a way that non-scientific or pre scientific belief systems cannot do. Science is a belief system as it fills the gaps which ideology and religion cannot fill and science also makes sense of the world around us. An example of this is science explains why earth is the perfect environment for humans to live on. However, Rationalists point out that science is based on fact, whereas beliefs are not: they rely on faith. Therefore, Rationalists argue that science is not a belief system. Dawkins put forward that science is based on evidence so science cannot be a belief system. Whereas some people use science to explain the world but we need to have faith in science, an example of this can be in regards to cures for cancer. Therefore people have faith in system and would claim science is a…

    • 1003 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In February of 1968, H. J. McCloskey’s published an article called, “On Being an Atheist.” In this, he argues that atheism is a more comfortable, logical and realistic than theism. He mentions the evil that is in the world and how it doesn’t make any sense to find comfort in a God that purposely causes pain, disease and natural disasters. McCloskey also mentions it is unreasonable to live by faith in this world. In this article, he argues the three theistic proofs including, the argument for design, the teleological argument and the cosmological argument.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bigfoot Research Paper

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages

    That argument is very logical hinting the repetitive phrase, “I’ll believe when I see it.” However, there are a lot of things that are not visible that we believe in. For example, in America 9 out of 10 Americans believe in God. God is not visible to us, so why don’t 9 out of 10 Americans believe in Bigfoot? Now in no way am I comparing the greatness of God to some creature in the woods, but when it comes to our belief in the things we cannot see, I feel as if we can treat certain things like we treat our belief in God. Also, in many science courses we learn about different things like carbon monoxide and air that we breathe that we can not see but we believe that those things contribute to our lives, so why not believe in something that we have not seen? Another argument that would challenge the theory of the existence of Bigfoot is that there is not any clear physical or visual evidence that proves Bigfoot is real. Well, a Bigfoot believer would quickly say, what on Earth can make an abnormally large footprint the size of 15 inches in the woods? That question more than likely cannot be answered without some deep thought and research and the question still may not be able to be answered. Also, throughout research and studies, a definite classification cannot be determined. If we can not conclude on the classification of Bigfoot, then of course proof will be…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Big Paper 1

    • 1625 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is human nature to question our existence. Some believe it was God who created our existence, and others rely on science. This has been an ongoing debate since life on earth. This paper argues that it is not possible to prove either way whether if the traditional God exists or not. There are no credentials to prove God’s existence or lack of; it is merely a belief. Some may rely on the Bible as proof although there is no way to prove the stories within true.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker, pg.63 Dawkins believes that everything happens by chance, but it does happen for a reason. He talks about the idea of finding a rock at your feet and finding a watch at your feet. He says there is a difference. The rock you would think has been just been there; it was not placed by anyone it is just there. The watch however had to have been placed there by mankind, because it is not just found in nature.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the first chapter of The Greatest Show On Earth, Dawkins discusses the acceptance of evolution as fact. He says that even with the insurmountable evidence to prove that it is a fact, evolution is still considered to some degree to be just a theory. In a survey of Americans, 40% of people oppose the idea of evolution. They instead believe that humans were created independently from all other living organisms. The percentage is only slightly lower in Britain. He argues that many of those who do not believe evolution to be a fact are uninformed. He states that his purpose for writing this book is to educate these people so that they may realize the truth and change their minds.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays