Preview

Good vs. Evil: High Moon

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1103 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Good vs. Evil: High Moon
Good vs. Evil
Cara Masterson
Capella University
Human Lifespan
October 21, 2012

Abstract
For this paper on Good vs. Evil, I chose to write on the movie High Noon. High Noon is a 1952 American Western film told in nearly real time. It’s the story of a town marshal, Will Kane, personally compelled to face a returning deadly enemy, and finds that his own town refuses to help him. Minutes before learning this, Will marries his pacifist Quaker wife and his plans are to turn in his badge for a simpler life as a shopkeeper. But first, he has a five year feud to end.

Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is an ethical approach made popular by John Stuart Mill. It goes by the belief of “the greatest good for the greatest number” (Rachels, 2012). Utilitarianism followers believe that “if the good outweighs the bad, then the action is moral” (Anderson, 2004). In High Noon, Will’s new wife, Amy, lives by this. She’s a Quaker and does not believe in violence in any way. At one point in the movie she explains how her brother and father both were killed in a shootout. She states they were on the “right” side, but it didn’t matter. One of my favorite lines and what I believe sums up Amy Kane well is “I don’t care who is right or who is wrong. There’s got to be a better way for people to live” (High Noon, 1952). Amy ends up abandoning her morals to save the life of Will, her husband. The entire town of Hadleyville seems to follow a utilitarianism theory when it comes to Will’s need to stand up to Frank Miller. Will approaches every man in the town, friends and enemies alike, and asks for help. He makes a plea that a Frank Miller-free world would be better for the whole town. No one seems to agree with Will. Even though multiple townsfolk readily admit that Will was the best marshal they have ever had and he helped make the town safe for women and children, they still refuse to help. They see it in a utilitarian view that it would make pleasure for Will but could cause pain



References: Anderson, Kerby. (2008). Utilitarianism:The Greatest Good for the Greatest Number. Probe Ministries. P. 54-60. Guthrie, Shandon L., (2001). Immanuel Kant and the Categorical Imperative. The Examined Life On-Line Philosophy Journal. 7(2). Rachels, James. (2012). The Elements of Moral Philosophy. McGraw Hills Publishing. ad

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A cultural issue that has led to many controversial topics is the stature of good versus evil. In other words, the argument suggests that novels and history itself demonstrates the blurred lines of good versus evil. In my opinion, good versus evil can never just be “good” or “evil”, but instead should be determined on the effect that the situation causes as a whole. Throughout society and in literature, the evidence to support my viewpoint is pervasive.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarian ethical theories are based on one’s ability to expect the concerns of an deed. Utilitarianism’s creed is that the result of any action takes importance over any type of means, this means that Utilitarianisms objective is to help as many individuals as possible even if it were to negatively disturb people along the way so as long as it helped the general populace. Basically, it’s the ends that matter not necessarily the means.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Open Range Film

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The film gives an ironic sense of violence. It has its share of gun slinging but it is portrayed to be necessary in the makings of a hero. For example, the use of violence that Charlie displays is viewed as positive when used against evil forces that are threatening the community. Charlie’s professional background in the field of violence suggest that he is a cold blooded killer but his use of violence and skills elevate him to hero status. In addition to the unlikely “heroes,” the film gives the characters un-Western characteristics. Classic Westerns rarely have characters that profess their love when they are up against a force where the outcome is uncertain. The “hero” needs to be alone; he cannot risk love getting in the way of a man’s duty. However, Charlie confesses to Sue that he has feelings for her.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A moral dilemma entails a choice between two highly conflicting values, where the decision made may result in guilt and remorse. As responders we are able to assess our own values in regards to the character’s actions. These characteristics are present in the texts Montana 1948 by Larry Watson 1993, The Returning by Daniel De Paola 1964 and Clint Eastwood’s Million Dollar Baby 2004. I personally have been influenced to assess my own values towards family ties, justice and the balance between right and wrong.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gran Torino

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “One thing we can be sure of is that conflict is unavoidable. Conflicts are happening all around the world, as they always have, and at many different levels” (Martin and Nakayama, 2011, pg. 224). Conflicts are not only seclusive to differing cultures, but can often occur within similar cultures as well. For this week’s writing assigment we were asked to watch the film Gran Torino, starring Clint Eastwood, and reflect on the conflicts and popular cultures within the story line.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    utilitarion vs kantianism

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The main rule of utilitarianism is to perform the one action that will provide the greatest amount of pleasure and the least amount of pain to the greatest number of people. In our case study, one would think the choice is quite easy, if we let go of Gary, we are providing no happiness for anyone and a great deal of pain to his family and friends and to ourselves. However, the one person that will get pleasure from this scenario is perhaps Gary, who is suffering. According to the utilitarian theory, the right action to perform would be to do everything in our power to save Gary, because if we save him there would be a lot more people that will be happy then if we were to let him die. There is only one person who would get pleasure from letting Gary go, and that is Gary himself. One could argue that the person watching Gary suffer will provide that person with a great amount of pain, but if we were to let Gary go, as painful as it may be to watch our friend die and be the one responsible, we may find ourselves happy that he did not suffer. The Greatest Happiness Principle suggest that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to promote the reverse of happiness. In our case study, saving Gary would promote happiness to ourselves and friends and family of Gary, letting Gary succumb to his injuries and letting go will promote the reverse of happiness to ourselves and friends and family of Gary. According to Mill, pleasures are qualitatively different, depending on their origin, meaning some pleasures should be counted more heavily. Does the pleasure we will receive in saving Gary and watching him live outweigh the pleasure Gary might receive by not suffering and dying a quick death. According to…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eth 316 Week One Essay

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The utilitarianism theory of ethics focuses on weighing options for actions and the choice made depends on the course of action that has the best consequences for the individual. This approach gives little consideration to the morals as long as the outcome benefits one’s self, even at the expense of some individuals. Morality issues receive consideration if the action taken is a moral one. For example, a person may not personally believe in war, but a soldier will serve when called because he or she believes in serving his or her country (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011).…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main idea of utilitarianism (U) is to create ‘the greatest pleasure for the greatest number of people’. This is similar to Christianity and the golden rule ‘love your neighbour as yourself’. With situation ethics, in a dilemma you should always do the most loving and compassionate thing. However in contrast to the utilitarian idea that you should try and greatest happiness for the most people, Christian ethics would look at everyone in an equal manner, as everyone was made ‘in the image of God’. It says in the bible that God is personal and loving and therefore looks after the vulnerable, whereas utilitarian’s would have to ignore the minority for their theory to work.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good vs. Evil

    • 1647 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Beowulf, the conflict between good and evil is the poem 's main and most important aspect. The poet makes it clear that good and evil doesn’t exist as only opposites, but that both qualities are present in everyone. Beowulf represents the ability to do good or to perform acts selflessly and in help of others. Goodness is also showed throughout this epic as having the ability to cleanse evil. Even though evil is presented by Grendel, Grendel 's mother, and the dragon, who are filled with a desire to act against people and ultimately destroy them, even pride, a human quality, is presented in Beowulf as a sign that evil exists. This story might even be considered a classic because it mainly talks about the old fashion good vs. evil, hero vs. villain. Beowulf and the three monsters show the significant difference between good and evil, and why god will always prevail.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that believes one should do what will promote the greatest utility for as many people as possible, that utility is often considered to be happiness or pleasure. There are different kinds of utilitarian views; hedonistic, preference, rule, and act to name a few, but they all have the same main objective. This theory does indeed seem good at first, but it is flawed. The case of the lonesome stranger challenges utilitarianism by bringing up issues of justice in different kinds of utilitarianism. The lonesome stranger is a persuasive argument to utilitarianism, showing problems pertaining to justice.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Robert Louis Stevenson’s theme of “Good vs. Evil” is prominent in the novel Treasure Island. This story begins by introducing the protagonist of the novel Jim Hawkins. Jim works at an inn, which his mother owns. An old buccaneer is staying there by the name of Billy Bones who possesses a mysterious sea chest, which…

    • 2728 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Definition of “Utilitarianism” is an ethical theory holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes the overall "good" of the greatest number of individuals. It is thus a form of consequentialism, meaning that the moral worth of an action is determined by its resulting outcome. The most influential contributors to this theory are considered to be Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill.”1 Utilitarianism is a simple theory and its results are easy to apply. It also allows for degrees of right and wrong, and for every situation the choice between actions is clear cut: always choose that which has the greatest utility. Utilitarianism is believed to have been derived from "Eudaimonia" which is the central concept in Aristotelian ethics. “In Aristotle's works, eudaimonia was used as a term for the highest human good, and so it is the aim of practical philosophy, including ethics and political philosophy, to consider (and also experience) what it really is, and how it can be achieved.”2…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The characters in this movie represent a mix of good, evil, and the grey area in between. Amy is the embodiment of good, as she wants only to live a simple life void of violence. This is until she is met with the choice of watching her husband die or taking action to save him. Through this difficult decision, she breaks her cultures laws to save the one that she loves. This was, by her morals, an evil action, but was portrayed as a good action in the movie. This to a small extreme was a “Deontologist” action, as Amy felt it was her duty to save her husband regardless of consequence.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The definition of utilitarianism is that the morally good thing to do is to pleasure the greatest number of people or animals for the least amount of suffering. For example you can rationalize killing a mass murderer before he kills even more people. Therefore taking the life of one person to save the life of many more.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics