Preview

Google vs. Chinese Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
914 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Google vs. Chinese Government
Google and the Chinese Government - Case Analysis

Overview: Google is a cutting edge Silicon Valley based Internet Company; known world wide for being a titan in the internet industry was admired for their ethical business standards and their distinguished and celebrated corporate motto, “Don’t be evil.” Google had established itself as one of the most visited sites in the world. Google was rapidly expanding as more than half its user traffic came from outside the US. Though Google.com was accessible to Chinese users, there were many issues related to many of Google’s search contents being blocked by Chinese regulations and slow unreliable service. Realizing the potential for growth in the Chinese market, Google attempted to purchase a minority stake in the Chinese search engine company Baidu. However, Chinese law prohibited Google from holding more than a minority stake in Baidu therefore; the next logical step was to expand its own presence in China. To assist Google with establishing a permanent presence in China, they enlisted the help of world renowned computer scientist Dr. Kai-fu Lee, who was highly regarded in China and in the Chinese high-tech community. The next step was for Google to negotiate with the Chinese government to allow uncensored access by Chinese citizens to a high-speed Chinese version of the Google search engine.
Central Issue:
How might Google reach and agreement with the Chinese Government that would allow them to successfully enter the Chinese market?
Significant Factors: * Agreeing to Censorship of a “Google.china” search engine could have been viewed as a violation of Google’s famous principle, “Don’t be evil.” * Current Chinese law prohibited Google from holding more than a minority stake in Baidu. * The “Great Wall of China” allows the government to block and censor any information that the Chinese government sees as “unfit.” * Google needed to place servers in China to improve speed and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Bus 421 Final

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In my research, the point of discussion is whether Google should move out or not, and why or why not. In this paper I will be presenting issues in regards to the markets in China and the advantages that these markets have for Google in order to continue its operations. I will also discuss in the various challenges and problems that Google faces in China.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Google in China

    • 9980 Words
    • 41 Pages

    Ó Springer 2008 Journal of Business Ethics (2009) 86:143–157 DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9840-y Google in China: A Manager-Friendly Heuristic Model for Resolving Cross-Cultural Ethical Conflicts ABSTRACT. Management practitioners and scholars have worked diligently to identify methods for ethical decision making in international contexts. Theoretical frameworks such as Integrative Social Contracts Theory (Donaldson and Dunfee, 1994, Academy of Management Review 19, 252–284) and more recently the Global Business Citizenship Approach [Wood et al., 2006, Global Business Citizenship: A Transformative Framework for Ethics and Sustainable Capitalism.…

    • 9980 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Itm434 Mod 5 Case

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Google's position of increasing global dominance and economic power is beginning to reveal a few cracks in the facade: first, its flirtation with the Chinese Government's censorship regime though, to Google's credit, it subsequently disengaged from these censorship controls at the cost of the virtual destruction of its business in China. Second, its policy on ad words which some see as an encroachment on intellectual property; and, third, its denial of responsibility as a publisher for the excerpts reproduced by its search engine (although the provider of a search engine has no responsibility for search results, the law is nothing like as clear when the search engine reproduces material from the destination site).…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    H., E. "How Does China Censor the Internet?" The Economist. The Economist Newspaper, 21 Apr. 2013. Web. 14 Feb. 2017.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Forum 6

    • 1004 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By 2005 while on sabbatical, “Lee approached Google about leaving Microsoft and coming to work for Google” (Ferrera, p. 320). Dr. Lee deserted Microsoft for Google. Dr. Lee had a passion for technology and wanted to return to China. Microsoft filed a lawsuit against Dr. Lee and Google in King County Superior Court in Seattle, Washington. The court granted a preliminary injunction in favour of Microsoft enjoining both Lee and Google from certain activities in relation to Google’s business in China.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Google vs. Monopoly

    • 1845 Words
    • 8 Pages

    When running a large system of goods or services which millions of people follow, it is obvious there will be ones who will be jealous of such a system and who will try to prevent or break this system by any means whether it involves cheating or not. In this case, Google is the big system who was accused of using its commanding position in Web search to hurt rival companies and leverage its travel services, restaurant reviews and other product.…

    • 1845 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Google Inc. in China

    • 7725 Words
    • 31 Pages

    A.1. Describe the perspective2 of the author(s) of the case study and the possible biases that might result from that perspective:…

    • 7725 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Google, Inc

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Prior to end 2005, Google had faced little negative press. In January of 2006, Google began to face negative rapport when they refused to provide information to the United States Department of Justice and filter “objectionable content” results that were forbidden by Chinese government (Agrenti 2009, p. 16). “The search engine giant knew bad publicity could be part of any trade-off if it wanted to become a major player in China’s burgeoning economy” (Agrenti 2009, p.16). As a result, Google was placed in a position where they had to comprise to keep from losing their position in the “engine search” market.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the establishment of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, the Communist Party has been using both censorship and surveillance as weapons to maintain its power. Not only applicable to most notable contents as pornography, corruption and anarchy, but also, with the evolution of the cyber world, censorship in China has risen up to a higher level: cyber-censorship and cyber-surveillance through the Great Firewall.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Amnesty International (2010). Google challenges China to end censorship. Retrieved, March 28, 2010 from http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/google-challenges-china-end-censorship-2010-03-23…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Google's Case Study

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. Is the threat, from the government-sponsored search engines, real or imagined? What can Google do to secure its dominance in those countries? What can Google learn from those experiences to guide it’s an entry strategy for other countries? The threat from the government-sponsored search engine is…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The African leaders responded to European traders by working together with European colonialists firstly because they thought this would protect their freedom. They did not think the Europeans would deceive them and take away their freedom when they signed the treaty. The Africans thought the Europeans wanted to protect them from others or to help trade between their countries and Europe. The African leaders were uneducated and treaties were read by missionaries and traders who talk them into signing.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority of people in America take for granted the vast amount of knowledge at their disposal due to the internet. Unfortunately, in some countries, the most prominent being China, the internet is heavily restricted to citizens, so that they are aware of very little of what's going on outside of their home country. China’s censorship of the internet restricts people from having full access to the knowledge it provides, as well as preventing them from expressing their opinions regarding sensitive topics.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Censorship in China

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As Google’s chief executive officer, I would abide by China’s internet policies, simply so I could get my company’s foot in the door. Although it would be much more profitable for my search engine to serve Chinese citizens without restrictions, having my company at least partially submerged in the hundreds of millions of internet Chinese users is better than having none at all. With most of the world’s population residing in the East, as well as where countless technological advances are being honed and fostered every day, getting my company out there is absolutely pivotal, regardless of the current restrictions.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self Censorship In China

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    China is a prime example of internet censorship as their censorship laws are especially strict on political groups against the People's Republic of China. The internet is a place for people to find other like-minded people so China targets the internet with its law extensively. For example, when China finally went after Google for giving Chinese citizens access to content the government wanted restricted, Google complied and had to create a separate Chinese version. As mentioned above, Google was self-censoring themselves by disallowing search results and therefore lessening traffic to those websites. Up until May of 2009 all business was well between Google and China. In May of 2009, Chinese censors blocked YouTube, which is owned by Google. It was blocked because a user had uploaded a video of Chinese police brutality and was quickly being shared around the internet. Google suffered majorly because of China wanting to omit this information from its citizens. Google was tired of having to deal with the special version of Google designed specifically for the overbearing laws of the Chinese government, and in January of 2010 they let search results bypass the barrier of the filter. China immediately responded and blocked all of Google. Trying to mend the wounds of what happened just two years ago, in May of 2012, Google announced it would…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays