The Market Structures
The complete economic activities are handled in four different market structures, namely perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly and monopoly. The nature and degree of competition varies among the all the above-mentioned four markets.
In summarized manner we can describe that as the number of sellers increases, each firms’ ability to charge high prices reduces. If number of buyers increases then buyers practice to purchase the goods at his choice price diminishes. The sellers have to face price competitions if the product is homogeneous and price and non-price competition exist if goods are differentiable. A large number of buyers and sellers make competition perfect. A homogeneous good with a number of sellers put the market in competition but a homogeneous good in a few sellers and a number of buyers leads the competition in another directions and put sellers in relatively good position. The complete knowledge of buyers and sellers regarding market price and goods encourage fair competition on the other hand incomplete knowledge of product, alluring misleading advertisements and forced differentiation of the goods break the pure competition. Production of a good by a particular producer or a few producers put the economy in their hands (monopoly) but if only a few buyers or a union of the buyers is controlling (monopsony) the market then market becomes non-competitive. All of the above there are some peculiar goods, which are non-excludable (can be consumed by any one without paying the cost) and non-rivalrous (no one has exclusive right over its consumption), that are not produced by any profit making companies such as military service to protect the nation.
Market Failure Causes
From the above discussion it is very clear that except perfect competition rest three market structures are not fulfilling the optimal criteria of economy i.e. high over all economic growth, full employment and fair distribution of income among the different parts of the society. The reasons for such market failure or non-attainment of the Pareto optimality (efficiency in exchange/consumption, efficiency in production and overall Pareto efficiency) are as follows:
1. Imperfect Market: Whenever the market is imperfect as under monopoly, monopolistic competition or oligopoly, the perfect market will fail to achieve the Pareto optimal conditions.
2. Externalities: If the prices in a market do not reflect the true marginal costs and/or marginal benefits associated with the goods and services traded in the market then there must be present of some externality. If the productivity of an individual affects the benefits of the others is called the production externalities and if the consumption levels of others affect the welfare of the individuals then consumption externalities occur.
3. Public Goods: Because public goods are non-excludable and non-rivalrous, they are not sold in a free market like private goods. Therefore, they cannot be provided by private firms.
4. Increasing returns to scale: There are increasing return to scale or decreasing costs due to technical externalities that lead to market failure under perfect competition. When there are increasing returns to scale in a perfect competitive market, they lead either to monopoly or to losses.
5. Asymmetric or Incomplete information: In the real world, there is asymmetric or incomplete information due to ignorance and uncertainty on the part of buyers and sellers of goods. Thus they are unable to equate social and private benefits and costs.
Type of Government Intervention
At this stage Government intervention comes into effect and Government try to provide the following benefits:
1. Control non-competitive behavior of the firms.
a. Taxation of monopoly profits (the Windfall Tax)
b. Regulation of oligopolies/cartel behavior
c. Policies to introduce competition into markets (de-regulation)
2. Using Tax or subsidies or by environmental policies combat externalities.
3. Provide public goods.
a. Direct provision of public goods (military services)
b. Price controls for the recently privatized utilities
4. Provide information and assure information flow by various law and policies.
5. Government changes the income distribution by society by imposing income tax and inheritance taxes etc.
Why corn/ soybean or wheat like agricultural commodity market do not need government intervention:
The agriculture commodity market for corn/wheat/soybean like commodities fulfill the conditions of perfect competitive market as
a) Many small producers
b) Homogeneous product
c) Many buyers
d) Free entry and exit
e) All the producer’s face the same cost as they have equal access to the same technology.
In the perfect competitive market a seller/producer has to simply determine how many units to produce and sell at the current equilibrium price. If a perfectly competitive firm earns short run economic profit, new firms enter in the long run and market supply increases hence the price decreases. As the price falls each firm’s economic profit diminishes. To restore the economic profit, existing firms make every effort to become more efficient, but their success encourages further entry in the market. Due to this continuous entry in the market in the long run each firm get a normal profit. If firms face the economic loss in the perfect competitive market and they are optimally efficient with current available technology then this environment compels some (weaker) firms to leave the market in the long run. As some firms exit, the market supply decreases and price increases. The process continues in the long run till each surviving firms earn a normal profit.
The graph below demonstrates the longrun equilibrium in a perfectly competitive market, where profit equals zero:
[pic]
We observe that the following is the case for a perfectly competitive market in long-run equilibrium • Profit (π) = 0 because P = ATC. • P = MR = MC = ATC. • The firm is producing the quantity where ATC is at its minimum point.
Technological Efficiency: At given cost of production (resources used) if the output produced is maximized then it is called technological efficiency. From the above diagram it is clear that the firm is technologically efficient as it is producing the output at the lowest point of its cost curve (ATC). It is natural as
i) All profit maximizing firms want to increase their profit by minimizing the cost of production; as in the perfect competition they cannot raise the prices of homogeneous product.
ii) As in long run profit equals to zero for a perfectly competitive firm, hence, if the firm does not choose to minimize the production-cost, ATC will increase and profit would be less than zero.
Allocative Efficiency: It occurs when resources are allocated to the production of goods in such a manner that society is a well off as possible. Marginal social cost (MSC) captures the opportunity cost of using another input in the production of a good, where opportunity cost refers to the best alternative use of an input. If more of a good is demanded in the market, additional inputs (e.g. labor, electricity, etc.) are required to produce additional output of that good. We can measure the cost of added production by looking at the marginal cost (MC) of producing one more unit of the good.
The rule to achieve allocative efficiency is that the additional benefits received by consumers from consumption of a good equal to the incremental costs of producing another unit of that good. MSB = MSC
To achieve allocative efficiency in the use of productive inputs, marginal social benefit must equal marginal social cost for a good or service. If marginal social benefit is greater than marginal social cost (MSB > MSC) then the benefits attained by consumers from the consumption of another unit of the good or service exceeds the opportunity cost of the allocation of additional inputs into the production of that good. In other words, when MSB > MSC, society wants more of the good produced and uses the market to signal that desire.
How does the market convey this information? Since price (P) equals marginal social benefit (MSB) and marginal cost equals marginal social cost (MSC), we have the condition that: P = MSB = MSC = MC; or P = MC
So the Pareto optimality conditions fulfilled. Hence the agriculture commodity markets for corn/wheat/soybean like commodities need not any government intervention.
Local Cable TV or local gas company need government intervention:
The local cable TV or local gas company in many countries works as a monopolist. The required conditions to be a monopolist are:
1. There is one seller or producer of a homogeneous product.
2. There is no close substitution of the product available
3. There is perfect competition in the factor market so that it can minimize the cost of the production
4. There are many buyers of the product but none of them can influence the price of the product.
5. There is no threat of entry of exit.
Given above assumptions, the price, output and profit under monopoly are determined by the forces of demand and supply. The monopolist has complete control over the supply of the product. He is also a price maker who can set the price to his maximum advantages. But he cannot fix the price and output simultaneously. Either he can fix the price and leave the output to be determined by the consumer demand at that price or he can fix the output to be produced and leave the price to be determined by the consumer demand for the product. Thus whatever price he fixes, whatever output he decides to produce are determined by the condition of demand.
[pic]
We observe that the following is the case for a perfectly competitive market in long-run equilibrium • Profit (π) >= 0 because P >= ATC. • P >= MR = MC • The firm does not produce the quantity where ATC is at its minimum point.
Technological Efficiency: Although each firm in monopoly want to reduce it’s cost of production to maximize the profit yet the industry/ market does not produce the output at the minimum point of ATC so the monopoly market is technologically not efficient. Allocative Efficiency: As we have already discussed that the condition to attain allocative efficiecy is P = MSB = MSC = MC; or P = MC
But as P is greater than MC in the case of monopoly so it is inefficient on allocation basis, which is called deadweight welfare loss (social cost).
We may say that the monopoly leads to misallocation and underutilization of resources and reduction in consumer’s welfare.
Government may impose regulations to control a monopoly:
For industries where the average total cost curve displays tremendous economies of scale, the government may decide that having a single provider is desirable. Using the measures of productive and allocative efficiency, regulators know that when left alone, a profit maximizing monopoly produces less of the good or service than is desired by society and at too high of a cost. Regulated monopolies agree to adhere to government oversight in order to sustain their monopoly status.
1. Forbidding the formation of monopolies (e.g., antitrust laws) 2. Forbidding monopolistic behavior (like predatory pricing) 3. Ensuring standards of provision. 4. Ensuring competition exists (e.g., deregulation) 5. Imposition of a lump-sum tax on a monopolist (shifts AC upwards), and supernormal profits are taken as tax. Governments may also regulate MC/AC pricing for monopolies.
Effects of MC/AC regulating pricing by government intervention :
Marginal Cost Pricing : Regulators set price where marginal cost equals demand. This is the most efficient solution as allocative efficiency is achieved: P = MC and therefore MSB = MSC. But the firm is losing money, as total revenues are less than total costs (see the figure given below). In the long run, if this condition prevails, the firm will shut down and cease to operate, not especially a desirable outcome if the monopoly provides an essential good or service such as electricity or water. It is sometimes called optimal price regulation. It does not work with natural monopolies (they will not earn a profit, and would exit the industry). See the following figure.
Average Total Cost Pricing : For natural monopolies, the regulator can force monopolies to charge the price where ATC crosses Demand. At this price economic profit will be zero, although there will be normal accounting profits. Sometimes called non-optimal price regulation. This is a more efficient outcome than no regulation at all. Price still exceeds marginal cost and therefore, marginal social benefits exceed marginal social costs. With average cost pricing, allocative and productive efficiency are not achieved. The firm earns accounting profits but no economic profits. Smaller deadweight loss than unregulated monopoly. See the diagram given below.
[pic]
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The three important market structures in economics are competitive markets, monopolies, and oligopolies. Each market plays a different role in the economy. Competitive markets are when no firm has the power to affect the market price of a good and “many buyers and sellers trading identical products so that each buyer and seller is a price taker” (Mankiw, 290). A monopolistic market is when a specific person or enterprise is the only supplier of a certain good. An oligopoly is a market in which a good has only a few “similar or identical” (Mankiw, 346) products for sale.…
- 805 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Monopolistic competition describes a marketplace consisting of a great number of sellers offering a differentiated product, which…
- 2282 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
“Competitive market is many sellers that sell similar products with very little control over the market selling price.” A competitive market achieves efficiency in the allocation of scarce resources if no other market failures are present. The competitive market does very well because of the demand price and supply price are equal. The demand and supply prices cannot generate any greater satisfaction by producing more of one good and less of another. The characteristics of competitive market are: number of firms in the market, control over the price of the relevant product and the type of product sold in the market. An example of competitive market structure is a gas station. There can be many gas stations in a certain mile radius, but the more gas stations there are in a small area, then the higher the competitive market.…
- 1137 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
There are four types of market structures, Monopoly, Perfect Competition, Monopolistic Competition, and Oligopoly. They are differentiated by the number of firms in the industry, barriers to entry, pricing power of the firm, output decisions interdependence, and whether products are homogeneous (Colander, 2013).…
- 1201 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The four market models are pure competition, pure monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly (McConnell, Brue, & Flynn, 2009). Depending on the type of market and the organizational goals the pricing strategy can vary.…
- 1047 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Text materials Amacher, R., & Pate, J. (2013) chapter 9 expound on the characteristic of perfect competition. the text stretches the importance of the six basic assumptions for the model of perfect competition which are large number of sellers, large number of buyers, homogeneous product, free entry into and free exit out of the market, and resources can easily move in and out of the industry. These six assumptions is a must, for perfect competition to exist. Unfortunately in our world ,it is very difficult for perfect competition to exist, but there are market that comes close, for example currency market would be close to perfect competition. Same product, many sellers and buyers, the down side is the market can be influences by external factors. High entry barriers would make profit difficult, long run equilibrium with perfect competition would be affected. It also means all firms would not be at the optimal size, unable to combined variable resources efficiently. There are competitive pressure when it comes to high barrier to entry in perfect competition, when it is difficult to get in a competitive market, firms create clever way to get in and sometime that involve corruption, for example, the taxi cab industry.…
- 795 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
There are different classifications of markets and the structure of a business determines which classification it will fall into. Markets are divided according to the composition of the business and what it provides to the specific market. Business composition is determined by the structure of market characteristics, and this helps determine level and area of competition. The characteristics in a market with the most concentration focus on number of purchasers and retailers, level in which a product has a substitute, price, entry and exit ease, and the level of mutual dependence. These structured variables are classified in the following market structures: perfectly competitive markets, monopolistically competitive markets, monopolies, and oligopolies (Colander, 2010).…
- 1637 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
There are a variety of different business structures that comprise the market in the world today. The most common ones found in the business world today are sole proprietorships, partnerships, and corporations. From these you will also find monopolies and oligopolies. Economists assume there are a number of different buyers and sellers in the market which leads to competition which allows prices to change in response to changes in supply and demand.(1) In many industries you there are substitutes for products, so if one type of product becomes too expensive the consumer can choose an alternative product that is cheaper, or one of better quality. This is called perfect competition within different companies. However, in some industries there are no substitutes for a product. In a market with only one supplier of a good or service, the producer can control the price meaning that the consumer does not have a choice, cannot maximize his or her total utility, and has very little to no influence over the price of the good or service they require. This is called a monopoly, where the single business is the industry. In slight contrast, you have the oligopoly which is at least two companies competing for market share. In an oligopoly, products are usually very similar, if not identical to each other, and in order to make their product more attractive they will lower their prices, forcing the other one out of the market until that firm lowers their price. Finally, the fourth type of business structure is called monopolistic competition. Like an oligopoly, these firms produce similar or identical products where substitute products usually aren’t available, although monopolistic competition is between many firms, where an oligopoly is usually two or three different companies controlling the market. In monopolistic competition, a firm takes the prices charged by its rivals as given…
- 1173 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Perfect competition describes several small firms competing with one another, many products, many buyers and sellers, and many substitutes. Prices are determined by supply and demand and the producer has no leverage. In a monopoly there is only one producer or seller for a product. Competition to monopolies may be limited to high prices or copyrights. In the oligopoly market…
- 1412 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The first market structure is perfect competition. Perfect competition occurs when numerous small firms are in competition with each other. Businesses in a competitive industry produce the socially optimal output level at the absolute minimal possible cost per unit.…
- 642 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The first structure that was discussed was the Perfect competition. Here the Perfect competition is characterized by many buyers and sellers, many products that are similar in nature and, as a result, many substitutes. “Perfect competition means there are few, if any, barriers to entry for new companies, and prices are determined by supply and demand. Therefore, producers in a perfectly competitive market are subject to the prices determined by the market and do not have any influence” (Investopedia, 2006). For example, in a perfectly competitive market, should a single firm decide to increase its selling price of a good, the consumers can just turn to the nearest competitor for a better price, causing any firm that increases its prices to lose market share and profits.…
- 845 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Competitive markets, monopolies, and oligopolies play a big role in the economy. We will be discussing the characteristics, price determination, output determination, barriers to entry, and the role in economy of each market structure.…
- 1081 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
References: Brown, K. (2010, December). An explanation and analysis of market and market structures to include monopolies, oligopolies, monopolistic, and pure competition. Retrieved from http://www.suite101.com/article/the-market-a322381…
- 1098 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Free market capitalism is a system of economics that minimizes government intervention and maximizes the role of the market. A free market economy is based on supply and demand with little or no government control. A completely free market is an idealized form of a market economy where buyers and sellers are allowed to transact freely (i.e. buy/sell/trade) based on a mutual agreement on price without state intervention in the form of taxes, subsidies or regulation. Government regulations, trade barriers, and labor laws are generally thought to distort the market. In practice, no country or jurisdiction has a completely free market.…
- 995 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
The model of monopolistic competition describes a common market structure in which firms have many competitors, but each one sells a slightly different product. If there was no differentiation, the competition would turn into perfect competition. In effect, monopolistic competition is something of a hybrid between perfect competition and monopoly. Comparable to perfect competition, monopolistic competition contains a large number of extremely competitive firms. However, comparable to monopoly, each firm has market control and faces a negatively-sloped demand curve. Monopolistic competition as a market structure was first identified in the 1930s by American economist Edward Chamberlin, and English economist Joan Robinson.…
- 835 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays