Early images were often nonspecific, only intended to represent founding principles and ideas of the belief system. It is interesting to note that Grabar states the imagery of Christianity and Judaism both grow simultaneously, even though Judaism was in practice some 2000 years before Christianity’s existence. Was this a result of Roman power and influence? This idea cannot go unexplored. Rome was powerful and influential and dismissing the possibility would be ignoring the obvious. Through the acceptance and eventually embrace, we begin to see a transformation of the imagery. Through the influence and machine of Roman propaganda, basic Christian images are recreated in a Roman form. Was this the original intent of Christ? Is not the idea of Christianity the salvation of one’s self through good deeds? The reinvention of Christian Imagery was subject to a state run idea. Images began to take shape with roots in the imperial palaces of
Early images were often nonspecific, only intended to represent founding principles and ideas of the belief system. It is interesting to note that Grabar states the imagery of Christianity and Judaism both grow simultaneously, even though Judaism was in practice some 2000 years before Christianity’s existence. Was this a result of Roman power and influence? This idea cannot go unexplored. Rome was powerful and influential and dismissing the possibility would be ignoring the obvious. Through the acceptance and eventually embrace, we begin to see a transformation of the imagery. Through the influence and machine of Roman propaganda, basic Christian images are recreated in a Roman form. Was this the original intent of Christ? Is not the idea of Christianity the salvation of one’s self through good deeds? The reinvention of Christian Imagery was subject to a state run idea. Images began to take shape with roots in the imperial palaces of