In Richard Kim's writing, “What's the matter with Graham Hill’s ‘Living with Less” he discusses the idea of Hill using his platform to show off rather than focus on other important things. He also seems to take the opportunity to bash Hill and use sarcasm throughout the essay. He states, “ In a majestic display of guileless narcissism, Hill, an Internet multimillionaire, congratulates himself for downsizing his life and getting rid of all the stuff—the homes and cars and gadgets and sectional sofas and $300 sunglasses” (1). Kim assumes that Hill is trying to show others all of the nice things he had. Kim believes that there are other important things such as the fact that the middle class works very hard and continue to struggle. He doesn't blame the people for wanting to buy stuff instead he blames the issue on the facts that things are not very expensive. Kim states, “and the Internet has already done a great job pointing out how obnoxious it is for a multimillionaire to hold himself up as a model of moderation when so many Americans are being forcibly downsized from already cramped lives” (2). Kim interprets Hills writing incorrectly. Hill was just trying to help others understand how much better and less stressful hey can live with
In Richard Kim's writing, “What's the matter with Graham Hill’s ‘Living with Less” he discusses the idea of Hill using his platform to show off rather than focus on other important things. He also seems to take the opportunity to bash Hill and use sarcasm throughout the essay. He states, “ In a majestic display of guileless narcissism, Hill, an Internet multimillionaire, congratulates himself for downsizing his life and getting rid of all the stuff—the homes and cars and gadgets and sectional sofas and $300 sunglasses” (1). Kim assumes that Hill is trying to show others all of the nice things he had. Kim believes that there are other important things such as the fact that the middle class works very hard and continue to struggle. He doesn't blame the people for wanting to buy stuff instead he blames the issue on the facts that things are not very expensive. Kim states, “and the Internet has already done a great job pointing out how obnoxious it is for a multimillionaire to hold himself up as a model of moderation when so many Americans are being forcibly downsized from already cramped lives” (2). Kim interprets Hills writing incorrectly. Hill was just trying to help others understand how much better and less stressful hey can live with