In Andrea Lunsford’s essay “Our Semi-Literate Youth? Not so Fast.” tells the reader that when college-age students or students in general abuse technology, they are prone to become semi-literate. As of matter of fact, Lunsford demonstrated a survey research and came to a conclusion that technology benefits the writing skills of the youth. Lunsford states, “So yes, these students did plenty of emailing and texting……
John McWhorter present extensive arguments on the interpretation of texting. A lot of people believe texting is killing language, but that’s not the case. Like McWhorter states, “Texting is a new way of writing young people are creating”, and there is nothing wrong with that. The reason people say texting kills language, is because they compare it to writing. These people need to understand that texting and writing are not the same thing, each is a separate thing and do their own job. “WYD”, “LOL”, and “OMG” are just a few acronyms used in today's texting, all these acronyms do is shorten up the conversation. McWhorter makes an excellent point when he explains how people don't think about punctuation when they are speaking, so why think about…
In a newspaper article, John Humphrys once argued that texters are “vandals who are doing to our language what Genghis Khan did to his neighbors 800 years ago. They are destroying it: pillaging our punctuation; savaging our sentences; raping our vocabulary. And they must be stopped” (335). Many people agree with this idea, and believe that texting is ruining the English language.…
Texting has for a long time been heralded as the demonized friend of the preteen middle schooler, the destroyer of all that is considered holy and well of the English language with its mess of letters, unpunctuated and lacking structure. Fueled on by media and a scholarly few, the idea took root that texting is a show of immaturity and illiteracy. The article “2b or Not 2b?” written by Professor David Crystal goes against this idea and tries its hand at tearing the stereotype apart. He explains that texting has created no new evil to the English language; abbreviated speech is not a stranger to the world in the slightest. Texting has only broadened the opportunities for linguistic creativity and expression.…
a. Cullington is a reliable source for the topic of texting and writing because she herself is a frequent ‘texter’ and as well a writer.…
Cullington’s article is about, even after much scrutiny, how texting actually improves people’s communication skills and academic writing skills. The reason that texting is heavily criticized is because students like to use incorrect grammar or use abbreviations to talk with each other (textspeak). Theoretically, it makes sense that texting should impair students’ writing; Cullington argues that is not the case. She argues that texting is just a fun form of communication, which students do not translate to their writing skills. “It provides students with motivation to write, practice in specific writing skills, and an opportunity to gain confidence in their writing (364).” Her article is in alignment with Jenna Wortham’s article because…
In Michaela Cullington’s “Does Texting Affect Writing?” the author effectively establishes credibility and logic that overpowers her small use of emotions. Cullington’s credibility comes into play when her audience is given the information through a footnote that she is a student writing this article (791). This gives the author every right to speak on the topic at hand…
In the article “The New Literacy” by Clive Thompson, he argues alongside with Stanford University professor Andrea Lunsford that technology, specifically social media, is improving students’ writing ability. There is a great deal of debate when judging social media and how it has affected this generation for the better or worse. According to Thompson, Lunsford indicates that technology is motivating and improving the writing capability of our peers today. Personally, I disagree with Thompson’s positive outlook on the effect social media has on students’ writing capability and believe that social media has destroyed and continues to destroy students’ proper writing technique.…
Lenhart, A., Specialist, S. R., Smith, A., Specialist, R., Macgill, A. R., Manager, P., et al. Writing, Technology and Teens - Pew Research Center. Index of /. Retrieved July 16, 2012, from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/808/writing-technology-and-teens…
E-mal has really destroyed the English language for many people, especially the pre-teen to teenager zone. Words like "LOL" (Laughing at Loud), " Cuz" ( Because), and other words that people are too lazy to write in full. These words, and the grammar along with it is destroying the minds of many young people, especially when a 12th grade English teacher receives a term paper with these type of words in them. That is something that is a very scary thing to think about, especially because the number of people writing this slang type of language is on the rise each year.…
Text messaging is the central structure of communication for teennagers. While teens may think shortcuts are helpful they may not understand the damage they are doing to their writing. While older generations consider it to be degrading to the English Language, over half of teens have come to the conclusion that texting has made their writing inapplicable. Although to some teens, shortcuts and proper English can still be effective. Researchers show that text messaging has been proven to have a negative effect on society, and to the English Language.…
In John McWhoter’s article, “Is Texting Killing the English Language?” he examines how texting has incorporated into some people’s vocabulary today in America. Texting has affected not only word choice, but as well as how the words are perceived. For example, McWhoter uses the famous texting acronym “LOL”. “He…
I surveyed numerous of students and got a lot of feedback and knowledge on high school and college freshman students. Most of the students said that informal writing have creeped up on them plenty of times. After doing research, I think that we can all agree that text messaging have made us forget some of our learning skills that we have been taught over the years. I have gained a lot of knowledge on how text messaging affects the literacy of teens. Some people would say that it is common sense not to use informal writing in papers, while other people say that if a person constantly uses informal writing it can become a habit. A lot of people that I surveyed said that informal writing have made them seen as if they were uneducated and not intelligent. Before doing any research, I would have said that I did not think that texting has affected teen literacy. After doing my research, I must say that informal writing has had a huge impact on teen…
* Young people write in code like foreign language when text messaging, soon young people will forget how to write in standard English…
During these times of technological breakthroughs, none can be more practical or influential to our society today than the development of Text Messaging. Helping people to communicate in ways our ancestors would have already considered magic. But despite all the benefits text messaging offers, it has also a downside, especially affecting teenage literacy. Text messaging is quickly becoming a primary form of communication for many people around the world, yet the research behind the rhetorical situation of text messaging is very limited. The mainstream media claims that the short hand and abbreviated characteristics of text messaging are making children lazy, not forcing them to use the proper grammar and spelling that they learn in school. The resulting opinion is that text messaging is to blame for low literacy rates of students.…