Preview

Great Power Hegemony

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
760 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Great Power Hegemony
Name: Sayed Jamaluddin Firozi,
St no: 1B1019

Great power hegemony

There is a question that which system (empire, balance of power, concert of power or great power hegemony) provides the best conditions for advancing peace, prosperity and civilization? There are several opinions about the advantages and disadvantages of each system and the functions, abilities and disabilities of them to maintaining the peace and stability in international arena. But I want to argue on hegemonic power system as a preventer of war among states and a maintainer of peace as comparison to other suggested types of system for advancing peace, stability and civilization in all over the world. Hegemonic power system is the best system for advancing peace, prosperity and preventing war among states comparing to other types of systems such as empire, balance of power, and concert of power. In this paper I will argue that as history of international relations show most wars and conflicts among states occurred in a lack of a hegemonic power because a hegemonic power try to act as a policeman and don’t let the states to start war. If war happens mostly the super power will enter the war to stop it because the hegemonic power does see itself as a policeman to have the right to intervene. So, hegemonic power is good for making peace and stability in the world. There are many reasons that great power hegemony system could be the best option for developing peace and preventing the war. It is clear that two world wars happened in the absence of a great hegemonic power. For example if in the 1910s there was great power hegemony the First World War may did not happen. In addition, hegemonic power system naturally makes its allies and don’t want to go just for its own interest but also look for others as well. In contrast in balance of power each actor in the system try to pursue its national interests and want to increase the power in terms of military or other resources.



References: 1. Luard, Evan. The balance of power: The System of International Relations, 1648 – 1815, St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1992. 2. Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of Great Powers, Random House, New York, 1987 3 [ 3 ]. . Journal of peace research, 1964-2007 (Vols. 1-44), http://www.jstor.org/stable/422972?seq=3

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Castlereagh Vs Wilson

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Concert of Europe was an international order created by a series of alliances that allowed Europe to experience the longest period of peace and stability ever known to the continent. The system aimed to preserve the status quo politically and territorially, and it relied very little on power to sustain itself. Rather, it worked by careful design influenced by the Pitt Plan and the errors of Richelieu’s work of the 1600s. Periodically, the involved nations would convene to discuss and agree on issues that could lead to the outbreak of a war. In this way, the system was able to maintain European peace by consensus. Perhaps the most important reason that the Concert of Europe worked was the sense of shared values that united the countries - a moral equilibrium allowed for power and justice to be in “substantial harmony”. In particular, Prussia, Russia, and Austria, the three Eastern powers, considered their unity as the “barrier to revolutionary chaos”. The system only disintegrated when the moral aspect was removed from European diplomacy - this substantiates a claim that the system’s success can be attributed to the moral equilibrium.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It was believed that the concept of the balance of power--an international equilibrium of political and military forces--would preserve peace in Europe.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    International decision making enables superpowers to make key decisions about the world economy, conflicts or environmental issues. This power is mainly held in the hands of inter-governmental organisations (IGO’s) some IGOs involve all nations, such as the U.N., whereas others are more exclusive such as the G8, or regional such as NATO. These IGO’s are important for superpowers to maintain their status as it allows them to focus global policy and decision making in their own interest. For example most IGO’s operate a veto voting system, where if a certain country with veto does not agree to the policy then the vote is not carried out. Many superpowers use this to their advantage, for example the EU and the USA tend to vote with each other, giving them the opportunity to block policies they do not agree with, therefore allowing them to force their own policies. This makes it difficult for smaller nations with less power to have a role in international decision making.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “World order” is the term given to the balance of power among the nation states of the world. Differences between these nations can lead to a power imbalance, which affects world order. It can best be achieved through agreements between states and other international instruments that set out the ideal international standards of behavior for states on a number of issues. But conflicts arise between countries due to differences in cultural attitudes and the desire for extra territory. In order to settle such disputes the international community has legal bodies such as the United Nations to cooperate with countries to find solutions and be a leader in settling and spreading ethical standards. Their prime aim is to promote world order. But for society not only the autonomy of nations and the lack of enforcement power but also a range of other factors limit the effectiveness of such an organisations.…

    • 2842 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two men that handled the task of creating a lasting peace for Europe after the generation of warfare were Metternich of Austria and Castlereagh of Great Britain. In order to start the peace throughout Europe, Metternich and Castlereagh as well as Charles Talleyrand of France opted to use balance of power to govern Europe. Balance of power meant that no state in Europe had more power than the other, everyone was equal. All states had equal political and military forces that would prevent war between any states and even more so prevent one state from dominating Europe.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hegemonic internationalism by definition is a paradox within itself. Internationalism suggests cooperation among nations for common good, while hegemony is an instance when one nation has power over another nation. This leads to the belief that hegemonic internationalism is, in reality, one nation pursuing its own national interests at the expense of other nation. Nazi Germany, Iran and the United States are all examples of a nation pursuing hegemonic internationalism.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As interdependence is rising in today’s world, power is too. This implies that countries, usually not democratic, have more state sovereignty on their people and therefore are likely to have an army, which makes it increasingly difficult for other countries to intervene. Unfortunately nowadays the effectiveness of HI is underestimated when a conflict comes, as “universal rights” and state sovereignty come face to face, state sovereignty usually wins the confrontation. Economic power also affects the number of interventions. The Chinese government, for example, violates human rights in some parts of the countries, especially near the borders of Tibet, and no military intervention from other countries is planned because of China’s well known world’s…

    • 1556 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    ‘A man is worth more dead than alive’ (Willy Loman, Act II). Willy Loman is a man on the verge of mental breakdown which will culminate in his eventual suicide. His ultimate destruction can be blamed on a number of factors, social pressure, family and friend influences, and his psychological and emotional state of mind. However, we are all subjected to the aforementioned issues to some degree throughout our lives and most of us take responsibility for our actions and by doing so endeavour to create reasonable happy, contented lives for ourselves and our families. So, some questions must be asked. Where and how did Willy Loman lose track and focus? To what extent is he responsible for his own downfall? To enable us to understand Willy Loman’s…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles was one of the most popular peace treaties that ended World War I. At the end of the war, the Allied Powers defeated Germany, demanding Germany sign to the harsh conditions of the treaty. The United States also isolated themselves from all European and Asian conflicts. Both the harsh treaty conditions and the policy of isolation by the United States led to the rise of Hitler and the beginning of World War II.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first area of this argument focuses on indulgence shown clearly defeated powers in the conference table in the century. For example, at the Congress of Vienna in France, despite putting Europe through nearly two decades of bloodshed unprecedented, they were allowed to return to their former borders to war, and later returned to Great Power status in the following decades. This was for the most part to the belief that the balance of power theory had to be used for the management and control of the two opponents and allies. In other words, no State wanted anyone else, even an ally to gain the opportunity to increase its effect in a power vacuum that the defeat of a great power like Napoleonic France was forced to create. After 1815 the great powers settlement in the so-called 'Concert of Europe' actively sought through Congress and diplomacy in general to preserve the balance of power that was defined by the territorial arrangement. It should also be noted that it was moderate success, as a study of the events of 1839-40 show where France, offended in their lack of inclusion in a four-Power intervention in the regime of the Ottoman sultan in his absence, participated in several actions that hinted he was preparing for war, but when the concert four entrenched power France backed down. Therefore, we can see that the balance of power can legitimately be seen to be a condition of…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The concept of 'balance of power is an important consideration in the analysis of the cold war which in theory was successful in avoiding any global conflict during the years 1945-1989. It was an ideologically based concept; communism versus democracy, USSR and its allies versus USA and its allies. Balance of power speaks to a situation in which peace is ensured by maintaining equilibrium of alliances between major powers. This equilibrium places checks and balances on any move towards hegemony, the political domination of one state over another. Although the hoped for result of the balance of power was the assurance of peace and stability there have been instances during the cold war where instability and regional conflicts occurred. There were three elements during the cold war that emerged and lead to the balance of power situation; alliances, territorial (spheres of influence) and military capabilities.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Balance Of Power

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The idea behind the balance-of-power was mainly to keep the states with their own independence and avoid universal monarchy. States would often form an alliance with the weaker states if “one state seemed to dictate too much” (Palmer, Colton, & Kramer 2014). Often times the state that did not like what the other state was doing they would build up alliance with the weaker ones instead of the stronger states to “restore the balance” (Palmer, Colton, & Kramer 2014). The alliances were usually formed during emerging situations and they were not politically or religiously inclined, they were formed freely with other allies…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    to explain the behaviour of states . The ideal behaviour of states in the B.O.P.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wars can be declared by countries other than super powers and these may eventually involve the world; new super powers may arise to challenge American superiority leading to new conflicts; a series of little wars all over the world may lead to the whole world getting involved and, finally, even small conflicts, like the present conflict caused by the terrorists can bring about a Third World War. If at all anything can prevent war, it would be if men are rational; but this is a pipe dream. All it requires is an ambitious politician to whip up emotions and rationality will fly out the window in an instant.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    unipolarism

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Immediately after the 2nd world war, a brief Unipolar system emerged, where United States of America was the only power in Europe with the Nuclear Power, and other European Power were very weak because of the devastation of the war. But this was short lived, because the system became Bipolar with US and USSR has the two superpower power with Nuclear weapons. This period was refer to as the Cold War Era. With the fall of USSR and the end to the Cold War, clearly the Bipolar system is gone. What is not certain is how to characterized the current, still evolving system.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays