Preview

Griggs Vs Duke Power Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
515 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Griggs Vs Duke Power Summary
Griggs v. Duke Power
FACTS:
The case originated in a lawsuit filed by Willie Griggs and twelve other African-American employees of Duke Power's Dan River hydroelectric plant in Draper, North Carolina. Before the passage of the Civil Rights Act, Duke Power discriminated against African-Americans in hiring and promotion, restricting them to the company's Labor department. In 1955, Duke Power instituted a high school diploma requirement for initial hiring in any department except Labor. (The other departments of Duke Power included Maintenance, Operations, and Laboratory.) In 1965, when the Civil Rights Act went into effect, this requirement was expanded to block transfers from Labor to other departments by employees who had not graduated high school.
ISSUE:
…show more content…
interferes with employee's ability to perform)
Duke Power must prove:
• No intentional discrimination against African-Americans in hiring and promotion, restricting them to the company's Labor department.
• Institution of a high school diploma requirement for initial hiring in any department except Labor to block transfers from Labor to other departments by employees who had not graduated high school.
• Their employment practice does not have an unjustified adverse impact on Willie Griggs and the other twelve who are all members of a protected class
APPLICATION:
Willie Griggs and the twelve other African American employees can prove one or more of the prima facie elements, for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    D Louis Abood Case Study

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moving to the future, in the year 1976 a man by the name D. Louis Abood brought forth a case against the Detroit Board of Education to the Supreme Court. This case was originally brought to court on the grounds that “the public school teachers in Detroit wanted to overturn the requirement that they pay fees equivalent to union does on the ground that they opposed public sector collective bargaining and objected to the political activities of the union.” The court found that “non-members may be assessed dues for collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment purposes.” The court made its decision based on the facts of the previous case of International Association of Machinists v. Street, as well as other cases heard…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. A business fails to meet the criteria if its practices are not equal and if has procedures unrelated to necessary job functions in the organization. In the case of McDonnell Douglas vs Green the Supreme Court holds that a charging party can prove unlawful discrimination indirectly by showing a failure in the organizational business process. In this case the hiring and firing of an employee, McDonnell Douglas was taken to court over their unethical tactics. The charging party has to only prove four things: they are a minority (protected group), they applied and were qualified for the position, the job was not offered to them, and the employer continued to seek applicants with similar qualifications. If the plaintiff can prove these four elements, the employer must show a legitimate lawful reason why the person was not hired.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eeoc Vs Freeman Case Brief

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to the law case EEOC v. FREEMAN, the EEOC filed a law suit against Freeman and alleged the company’s hiring policy which includes criminal background and credit history checks, has a disparate impact on African-American, Hispanic, and male applicants. And the material fact of this case is whether Defendant’s hiring criteria of conducting criminal background and credit history checks is consistent with business necessity. Since the Defendant was charged by the EEOC with unlawful discrimination in this case, the source of law is the Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964. “Title VII prohibits discrimination in hiring, firing, trainings, promotion, discipline, or other workplace decisions on the basis of an employee or applicant’s race, color, gender, national origin, or religion” (Bennett- Alexander & Hartman, 2011).…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 39 Questions

    • 608 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This case involves itself within The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The NLRA allows employees the right to form a union, to bargain collectively through a representative chosen on their own, and etc. Hence, employers have their rights but also obligations under the NLRA. The NLRA does not allow employers to discriminate or take part in any unfair…

    • 608 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For starters, when it came to the interviewing process, there were 5 white officials and 1 black which showed that the room was not balance. Next, when it came to the scoring, he received lower scores than the whites. The next issue that showed discrimination was when it came to the attendance record of the workers. Two of the workers who were Caucasian, had the same attendance as Dunlap, and they received a better ranking. Also, Dunlap had a perfect safety record and received a score of a 4; while a white applicant who was at the job for eleven, had 2 accidents within those years and received a score of…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of the top ten potential employees one African American was hired. This man, William Parchmen, stated how he had been trying for years to get employment from the TVA, but didn’t succeed up until then. This was because he filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (Martin, B.)…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Civil Rights Movement during the 1960s, President Kennedy directed government contractors to take, “affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without the regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin” (NSCL 2015). As a result, the Affirmative Action Program (AAP) was established to meet these specifications.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sotomayor Unit 7

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 2003, the Supreme Court of New Haven was mandated to reexamine Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 1964, as it was presented a disparate impact discrimination case against the same City’s firefighters. The African American firefighters, expressed their disgruntlement, as they did not feel professionally appreciated by their superiors. On the contrary, they did not have the privilege as the opposite ethnic group to seek for upward mobility within the Fire Department.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Siegel Case Summary

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Managers getting a C grade lost bonuses, pay raises, and faced conceivable termination, if a C was received two consecutive years. The plaintiffs assert an unbalanced amount of older managers received a C rating (US Newswire, 2002). Disparate impact was the foundation of this particular law suit. Plaintiffs state Ford Motor Company senior management formulated a performance appraisal system in which one group of particular people were affected in a more negative manner than the others (Myers, 2003). Disparate impact is a concept brought about in 1971, in the case of Griggs v. Duke Power Company, explained in the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 1964 (HR Guide, 2012). It disallows professional practices affecting employees that may not appear as deliberate actions of discrimination, but are discriminatory in operation.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The factor that unites all of the plaintiffs is that they were all under the same non-discriminatory contract…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eeoc Paper

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The lawsuit that I have chosen is about a company not hiring someone because of their race. Tyeastia Green sued Alliant Techsystems, Inc. (ATK) because they did not hire her due to her race. A recruiter for ATK initially told her that she had gotten the job, later ATK rejected her and hired a while male instead ("U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission", 2012).…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Steelworkers was about a company that implemented an affirmative action based training program in order to raise the ratio of black skilled trade workers. Half of the qualified positions into the training program were set aside for blacks. Weber was passed on for participation in the program. Since he was white, he claimed that he was the target of reverse discrimination. The question is whether or not the training program violated Title VII, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race. The Supreme Court held that the training program was legitimate because the Civil Rights Act did not intend to ban companies from taking steps to effect the purpose of Title VII. The intent of the program was to irradiate racial segregation while to not stop whites from advancing in their careers. The program was found to be consistent with the intent of the…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ricci V. Destefano

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On June 29, 2009, the last day of the United States Supreme Court’s 2008–09 term, the Court rendered the much anticipated decision in Ricci v. DeStefano, 129 S. Ct. 2658, 174 L. Ed. 2d 490 (2009). Ricci was quickly dubbed the “white firefighter’s case” by many, however, the case involved much more than the firefighters’ asserted right to a promotion.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the McDonnell Douglas case Percy Green was laid off from his position as a mechanic as part of companywide reduction in workforce. After being laid off, Green took part several illegal demonstrations that included blocking access to other workers at McDonnell Douglas by use of cars blocking roadways and a lock out. Three weeks later McDonnell Douglas placed an ad for a mechanic position. Green applied to the position and was denied employment, for which he filed suit claiming racial…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is3350 Unit 4 Assignment

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2. Discrimination – This company does not condone discriminating against any person or groups of persons on the basis of…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays