Preview

Group Decision Making in Challenger Launch

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
363 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Group Decision Making in Challenger Launch
GROUP PROCESS IN THE CHALLENGER LAUNCH DECISION:
ANALYSIS:
NASA was created with the intent to establish military culture, US dominance over USSR. Morton Thiokol, Inc., an aerospace company, manufactured the solid propellant rocket motors manufactured the booster rockets SRB used to launch the Challenger Shuttle. Morton Thiokol called for a teleconference, fortnight before the launch had been scheduled to discuss the O ring problem. The Challenger launch was disaster due to various reasons: 1. The engineers at Morton-Thiokol knew that the O-rings did not work well in low temperatures. Although the engineers did tell NASA that about the failure of the O-rings under these conditions, Morton-Thiokol did not do so in a persuasive manner. Morton-Thiokol did not make NASA aware of the grave danger their crew would be in if these O-rings don’t work correctly. Morton-Thiokol should have made sure that their concerns were heard and acknowledged by NASA. 2. Morton-Thiokol was simply afraid to make such a big deal, and they didn’t want to admit that they had made a faulty part or that it might fail. Also, there were financial & political environmental pressures to launch the shuttle on NASA so they were preoccupied with the idea of launching shuttle & any decision to delay was rejected by group. Considering NASA's attitude, no group member or individual was willing to be held accountable for any comment or decision 3. From NASA side, Morton-Thiokol may not have stressed the importance of the possible problems with the O-rings, but once again NASA’s management withheld information. 4. Power Distance in Morton Thiokol & NASA as the engineers passed the information along to the management, but again they did not continue to pass it up the ladder. 5. Lack of concern and information on the part of Morton-Thiokol as they didn’t have proper heuristics to support their view otherwise the NASA would have postponed their launch. 6. Lack of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Political pressures, poor risk management and hasty decision making were the primary reasons for the numerous conflicts in the GP-B launch. Fear of cancellation and financial losses influenced the teams at NASA, Stanford University and Lockheed Martin to oversee the intricate technical problems. Each of these organizations consisted of cross-functional teams that made independent decisions under different biases, and no co-ordination. In addition, the task group also experienced several technical anomalies with the Experimental Control Unit (ECU), a box on the spacecraft that housed a number of electronic components. All these reasons led to a build-up of issues till the very end. Proper management and collaborative thinking could have led to timely decisions, avoiding many of the problems that GP-B faced.…

    • 2381 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the following case study, we’ll have a brief analysis of the disaster that took place with the “Challenger Space Shuttle” and the role played by the 3 most important players: Thiokol, NASA and the White House. At the end we will discuss the things that could have prevented not only this but all major disasters that take place in various organizations.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The sequence of events that led to the bad decision on the part of NASA’s base lie in economic, political, and scheduling backlog pressures. Competition from the European Space Agency put NASA under pressure to come up with a space mission, which would hopefully shed light on the ability of NASA to plan commercialized space departures. NASA also had to prove that its program should continue to be funded; another unforeseen pressure pushing NASA to schedule its record number of Space exploration trips that year than in any other year. Also, the space shuttle mission scheduled before the Challenger had been delayed over and over; a record number of times. The next mission after the Challenger involved a probe being sent into space in order to evaluate Haley’s Comet. If the Challenger and subsequently the next mission were not executed in a timely manner then a doppelganger probe from Russia would beat the U.S. probe to Haley’s Comet. Pressure to launch the challenger, as soon as possible, could have also come from President Reagan’s upcoming State of the Union Address in which he would be mentioning the first teacher astronaut in space. All of these beforehand mentioned pressures led to bad engineering design, and timing, which ultimately led to the failure of the Space Shuttle Challenger mission. In order to evaluate and correct…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    hider of truths

    • 2488 Words
    • 10 Pages

    6. How did their calculation error affect the amount of fuel that was pumped into the plane?…

    • 2488 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    All in all, NASA's decision to launch the shuttle was imperfect. The top level decision makers had not been informed of problems with the joints and O rings or the possible damaging effects of cold weather. Shuttle designers made several technical alterations, including an improved O ring design and procedural changes which included stricter safety reviews and more restrictive launching conditions.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4) On-time delivery from vendors was no better than 60 percent. And forget about accurate sales forecasting. The company lacked the most basic information to achieve that crucial goal.…

    • 838 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    5) Low involvement of management in the various launch issues of Biometra as well as indifference of Peterson’s boss Hardy to the urgency of decisions.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Projects account for about one fourth of the U.S. and the world’s gross domestic product” (Schwalbe 2012). With that said, there are many challenges and issues that hinder the ultimate success or completion of a project. So is evident in the case of the Orion Shield Project, whose execution faced issues of technical, ethical, legal, contractual and interpersonal natures. Taking on a role that assumes responsibilities in stark contrast to newly appointed project manager Gary Allison’s professional background and experience doomed the project from the start. Not only did Gary not have the experience, he failed to research and prepare himself, prior to the project’s inception, with the proper project management tools and techniques that are pertinent to the success of a project. The ethical issue of false promise, regarding the maximum temperature at which the shield could operate successfully, was apparent before planning had begun and the role of project manager was officially accepted by Gary Allison. This dishonest proclamation was unsettling to Mr. Allison but he failed to voice his concerns, therefore perpetuating his anxiety and lack of confidence of the projects success. Technical issues, straying from strictly scientific measures which were Mr. Allison’s sole forte, existed in the execution (or lack thereof) of project milestones. Contractual issues arise when Gary and is team failed to follow contract protocol and policy, regarding problems with communication and weekly data share amongst all stakeholders as well as manufacturing delay demands, and cost overruns. Legal issues tie into the contractual breaching that served as a continuous theme of Gary’s non-cohesive managerial process. Interpersonal or social issues continued to surface and resurface with the lack of initiated data share, communication, and responsiveness amongst all the project stakeholders. While, ultimately, Gary…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Orion Shield

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Orion Shield Project was analyzed, particularly in regard to the program manager, Gary Allison. Having never managed a program before, Gary was given an opportunity to do so on this valuable project. Several stakeholders came into play; some that helped contribute to Gary’s demise, and others who were often left to pick up the pieces where Gary may have failed. Ultimately, it was determined that in more than one way, Gary was not a successful program manager. Technical, ethical, legal, and contractual shortfalls were addressed to see where Gary and his team may have gone wrong.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apollo 13 Design Essay

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There was an accident on the spacecraft 2 days after it was launched into space. The accident was that wires were exposed inside the oxygen tanks through manufacturing and testing errors before the launch. The night of August 13, 1970 a spark from the exposed wires caused a fire, which ripped apart one oxygen tank and damaged the other inside the Odyssey, spacecraft. The astronauts were losing oxygen fast. In our project we had to find a solution to get the ping pong ball from one side of the gap to the other. Some similarities with Apollo 13 and our project was that we all had to find a solution of a problem and we all had one chance. These similarities are important to the success of Apollo 13 and our team because if the mission control of Apollo 13 did not find a solution fast, the lives of 3 innocent men would be in danger, and if we didn’t get the ping pong ball from one side to the other we wouldn’t have learned or experienced the importance of team work, corporation, and responsibility. Also our grades would be in danger as well. Some other similarities that we had with Apollo 13 was we all had limited time and supplies. This was very important to both Apollo 13 and us because if mission control didn’t finish building the machine in time then the 3 men would be lost in space and would sooner or later die without oxygen. Like Gene Kranz said “Failure is Not an Option” in this case for…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Later that day, president Reagan gave a public announcement about the accident, stating, “The future doesn't belong to the fainthearted; it belongs to the brave. The Challenger crew was pulling us into the future, and we'll continue to follow them.” (EBSCOhost). He later appointed a special commission to determine what went wrong with the Challenger developed corrective measures for other shuttles and space crafts. Due to this national tragedy and extensive media coverage, NASA decided to suspend all shuttle missions temporarily to evaluate the program for about two years.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The launch of Sputnik, by the Soviets, in 1957 prompted the US to do something to catch up to the Soviets. The first thing the United States did was to end any opposition to developing space travel. By 1961, national prestige was quoted as a reason for developing space travel. The American people supported the Space Race and were thrilled in the fact that they ‘won’ the race. However, by 1970, the political climate had shifted. For the time being liberals were disappointed with the whole technology sector, due to its association with the military during Vietnam. A conservative administration had taken over as well. With limited liberal support, NASA was unable to prevent the Nixon administration from killing the lunar program. NASA was able to salvage a short-term orbital lab, Skylab.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Challenger Space Shuttle, one of the most anticipated shuttle launches, was the first mission to ever include a teacher astronaut. Christa McAuliffe, the teacher that was going on the shuttle along with six others, was supposed to broadcast lessons around the country from space. Sadly, all the excitement and joy came to an end shortly after the launch. The mission marked the first time American astronauts lost their lives. One of the worst disasters of manned spaceflight is the Challenger Space Shuttle explosion(Challenger, 2008), which was caused by a combination of natural and man-made issues, and had a permanent effect on safety and regulations of manned spaceflight.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Space exploration was magical for my generation. If you asked any child, especially boys, what they wanted to be when they grew up, many would proudly announce “An astronaut!”. That does not seem to be the case with the youth of today as our space program is not the glory we once knew. For the majority of Americans, the Challenger Disaster was just that, a disaster. After watching the documentaries and listening to the opinions expressed by both experts and those actually in charge of the lethal decisions in the launch, my views have changed. It is hard to imagine money and appearance were the driving motives to launch a shuttle with known complications. The fact the space program…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fggds

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The challenger explosion happened because there was a broken O ring. If the scientists didn’t overlook this problem then those people who died in the explosion would have lived the carelessness of these people cost the other people their life. I think that this could have been easily stopped the flight could have been postponed or even cancelled but it wasn’t and cost 7 people their life the families blame the space program for these deaths.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics