Guilty Act-Latin: Evidence That Prohibits Specific Acts

Criminal law often prohibits specific acts. Therefore, the evidence must be reasonably demonstrate actions caused by the suspects. This particular action is called guilty act - Latin: actus reus. Prohibited acts can constituted by an act or an act of intimidation, or in some extreme cases, the non-action as well. For example, parent starved newborn is also a forbidden act. If the offense is a no action as mentioned above, it should be accompanied by a duty. This duty may be due to contracts, voluntary commitment, relationships and sometimes blood vessels due to their assigned positions. Responsibilities also can form if you manually create a dangerous condition. An offense can be defended if the prosecutors could not prove causal link of the offense of the offender for damages caused.
Aware of this crime be interpreted as an intentional while doing a misconduct. Note that in criminal law, criminal consciousness is completely separated from the intent, motive of the suspects. The deliberate criminal prosecution easily prove if the suspect knows his behavior will be dangerous but still do it. When considering factors intentionally committing a crime, the court must consider the West suspects more aspects when action really "want" specific consequences or not. For example, in the murder, the "want" or "do not want" deaths can switch from willful murder (death) to manslaughter (in prison). This is a very difficult field to prove and