General purpose: To persuade
Specific purpose: After listening to my speech, audience members will be aware of gun control and the steps to take to eliminate it.
Thesis: An argument against Gun Control as long ago as 1789, the creators of the Constitution realized the importance of guns in American society.
INTRODUCTION I. Attention-Getter: Guns don’t kill people, people kill people. II. Thesis statement III. Preview of main points
BODY I. Gun control makes no effort to control criminals A. The fundamental flaw in the thinking of anti-gun politicians is that guns don't kill people. People kill people. B. The same logic that leads one to control firearms could also lead one to endeavor to control automobiles and fast food simply because they are instrumental in millions of deaths per year. C. Criminals should be controlled, not the guns which they share with millions of law-abiding citizens.
II. Gun control supporters claim that gun control lowers crime rate. A. Gun control does nothing to reduce crime. B. West Virginia stands as an example of the inaccurate thinking of gun control advocates.
III. Gun control advocates believe that gun control has no effect on the law-abiding citizens. A. Gun control takes recreational firearms from law-abiding citizens. B. Gun control puts citizens at a disadvantage when dealing with criminals and protecting his family.
CONCLUSION I. Review of main points II. Finals remarks: The time is at hand for Americans to stand and defend their Second Amendment rights, and make liberal, anti-gun politicians aware that gun control has no place in society.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In “Just Take Away Their Guns,” by James Q. Wilson, Collins Professor of Management and Public Policy at the University of California at Los Angeles, the author shows what is wrong with each side of the argument. In the first paragraph, he says, “The president wants still tougher gun control legislation and thinks it will work” (Barnet and Bedau 124). But, he continues on to say how this will not affect the illegal use of guns. About 200 million privately own a gun and one-third of that 200 million own a handgun (Barnet and Bedau 124). Only two percent of the citizens are using them in unlawful acts (Barnet and Bedau 124). The number of people who defend themselves outnumbers the amount of arrests for crimes committed. There are many issues with gun control, such as, whether a citizen should be able to own a gun or not, law enforcement confiscations, and punishment for criminals who use guns.…
- 624 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
1) The high casualties caused by guns are a result of how easy it is to obtain one. If policies were made stricter, casualties would go down.…
- 770 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
They use them to protect society, when civilians have them, they will most likely not be used for good…
- 407 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
b. Thesis Statement: gun control policy is often developed as a result of some organizational crisis rather than as a matter of long term strategy.…
- 395 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
b. Guns can lead to many terrible things such as school shootings that have taken place in the past BUT…
- 293 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
B) According to the Brady Campaign, he states that “New Jersey already has the second-most extensive set of gun control laws, after California.”…
- 481 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
A. Well did you guys know that homicide rates have been proven to be higher in states that have the Death Penalty compared to those without it?…
- 1150 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The phrase "Gun Control" means different things to different people. One bumper sticker states that "Gun Control means hitting your target." However one defines gun control, the mere mention of it brings controversy. Opposing sides have for years fought over the laws that govern firearms. For the purposes of this paper "Gun Control" is defined as policies enacted by the government that limit the legal rights of gun owners to own, carry, or use firearms, with the intent of reducing gun crimes such as murder, armed robbery, aggravated rape, and the like. So defined, gun control understandably brings favorable responses from some, and angry objections from others.…
- 1671 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Gun control is a controversial and divisive issue in our routine life, not only in the United States, but also all over the world. Basically, gun control refers to governmental efforts to limit or restrict the production, sale, possession and use of guns by private citizens. Some people believe that it is necessary that federal and state laws allow citizens to purchase and possess guns, or even actively require adult citizens to maintain weapons in their house, and periodically to train in their use. However, others think gun control is indispensable in our society because gunshots are the main cause of death in the United States. As for me, I prefer to support the second view because guns are lethal and the fewer people that have them the better. The only function of a gun is to kill. The more instruments of death are removed from our society, the safer we will be. With my research, I found a lot of striking data about guns menacing people’s lives. There should be gun control in the United States because guns are a menace to people’s lives.…
- 1324 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The argument on firearm regulation has been a heated discussion for many years. On one side of the debate, we have people in favor placing restrictions on guns, while, on the opposite end of the spectrum, we have people fighting the regulation of guns. People in favor gun restrictions believe gun control can reduce crime ,while, the people against gun control believe having the right to bear arms is an effective crime deterrent. I believe that every law abiding citizen should be able to carry a gun and defend themselves against people who intend to harm them.Gun control laws are simply ineffective and they have an adverse effect on crime. Instead of reducing crime, gun control laws just simply take guns out the hands of good people and puts the guns into the hands of the bad guys.…
- 1340 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Gun control has been a controversial issue for years in the United States. Some say that with stricter gun control laws there will be less crime. Others disagree stating that there would not be less crime with stricter gun control laws, and that it is our constitutional right as Americans to keep and bear arms. But which party is correct? Too much gun control would impose on our rights as a free people and not necessarily result in the desired outcome. But if there were too little gun control and anyone could carry a gun, things also would not pan out the way that they should. Recognizing both sides, there should not be more gun control laws because they impose on our constitutional rights; they decrease the safety of our families, schools, and society; and they focus on the wrong problem which is not the guns, but the people carrying them.…
- 992 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The controversy regarding the gun control is neither a new one nor particular to United States. Majority of the gun control laws make no demarcation between the citizens who are law breakers and those who are law abiding. Gun control laws simply entail that anyone who possess a gun is likely to be a law breaker, which is merely not a case (Reynolds & Caruth, pp.01). The purpose behind the gun control and gun crime laws is to avert the criminals from acquiring guns and using the guns they had acquired. However, the number of armed crimes as well as criminals has amplified during the time when gun control laws have thrived. It appears as if the actual results of gun control have not been the projected ones (Reynolds & Caruth, pp.02).…
- 702 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
For many years the controversial topic of gun control has sparked countless passionate debates. The arguments posed in these debates vary widely concerning the possible solutions to solving the problem of violent crime due to the possession of firearms. This paper introduces three different views concerning gun control. The first illustrates the freedom to own firearms. The second view advocates the complete restriction of firearms owned by citizens, and the last one presents a modified freedom of possessing firearms. Each faction seeks to have its position supported by national legislation.…
- 1208 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Should the mere fact that criminals committing crimes with the use of guns infringe the national right of the innocent to possess guns. This is a question that arouses everywhere and no matter which way it is viewed the controversy will always go on. "A gun is a mere tool that can be used for good or evil. Our country is based on the belief that man is good until he or she is proven to be otherwise."(Harris p.2) This means that only a few people are committing crimes with uses of guns and why completely remove them from society. Therefore, we should strenuously protect the rights of free men and likewise prosecute and punish the criminals who abuse the rights of others. The problem with gun violence is associated with the child's atmosphere. Moreover, we need to educate young children about responsibly handling guns and educate them to respect life and the life's of others. The movement of gun control exploits every celebrated act violence and offsetting the hundreds of thousands of cases in which guns are used as defensive weapons to save live and property of the innocent. Moreover, guns do more good that bad. This issue completely contradicts the Second Amendment which states: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."…
- 1000 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
5. The people for gun control believe getting rid of guns will save lives, reduce crime greatly, that Americans own too many guns, and that owning a gun won’t help you. Some politicians also think citizens would be…
- 395 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays