Preview

Habeas Corpus: A Case Against Terrorism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1703 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Habeas Corpus: A Case Against Terrorism
Habeas Corpus Our country has certain laws protecting both civilians and prisoners. There is a law given the name Habeas Corpus which states that an accused must be brought before a judge and there must be sufficient evidence and reasoning of why the accused is being sent to jail. This allows the accused to defend their actions or prove the evidence being brought forth is false to keep from unjust imprisonment. Habeas Corpus has been followed since 1215 and recently was put on hold. Recently our nation has been accused of unjust imprisonment offshore in Cuba by the UN. Guantanamo Bay detainees have the right to Habeas Corpus even if held off American Soil. The United States adopted Habeas Corpus in 1215 and was suspended by President Bush …show more content…
“ I heard about September 11 attacks for the first time in Guantanamo. I was no aware of their magnitude until after my release, when a reporter showed me the images online at an Internet cafe in Tirana” (Qassim). Many men being held in Guantanamo bay are not sure why they are being held, and what information they are supposed to be given. Most of the detainees don’t even understand the extent of what happened on September 11th, and they will not understand until they are let out and shown. How can we expect to gain information from those who have no idea what has even happened? It was a tragedy that happened to our country, but that doesn’t mean other civilians had the resources to understand what happened. Most of the detainees are innocent bystanders who were at the wrong place at the wrong time. That doesn’t mean that they know any new information that we need. We are harming innocent people and even killing them to get what we want, but we are gaining very little information. Habeas Corpus should not be taken away from the detainees, even the guilty monsters in America get it, why shouldn’t they? Especially when there is proof that most of them are …show more content…
Most of the prisoners are innocent and need lawyers to make sure no more illegal actions happen. Human beings deserve the rights we have promised them no matter a criminal or a civilian. Unjust imprisonment is a serious crime, and even though it isn’t on American soil, the prison is still run by Americans. We need to take responsibility for the wrong that we have done, and try to make things right. Our country needs to stop being hypocritical and stand behind the law system that we are envied for. Habeas Corpus needs to be reinstated and the detainees deserve a fair trial or need to be let go.

Bagnall, Janet. "Shut It Dow:Guantanamo Bay Prison Violates U.S. Support for the Rule of Law." The Gazette 14 June 2008. 27 June 2008 <http://lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic/frame.do?tokenKey=rsh-20.814969.437371531>.
Ivins, Molly. "Habeas Corpus." News Center. 28 Sept. 2006. 6 June 2008 <http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0928-20.htm>.
Katel, Peter, and Kenneth Jost. "Treatment of Detainees." os 16 (2006): 1-37. CQ Researcher. 27 May 2008

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror. Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating prisoners captured during the conflict. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at “GITMO.” Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments.…

    • 6132 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating captured prisoners. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at “GITMO.” Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments. In 2011, Congress specifically prohibited the expenditure of funds to transfer GITMO prisoners to detention facilities in the continental United States, making it virtually impossible to try them in civilian courts. As of April 2012, 169 remained in detention at GITMO (Sutton, 2012).…

    • 36699 Words
    • 107 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In part 3, Morris (2002, p.171) discusses why prison conditions matter and why penal reformers, including himself, have devoted their lives and travelled thousands of miles to other countries in search of answers to questions that would improve prison correction from what is corrupt or defective. Morris (2002, p.172) suggests human rights are relative to all human beings whether free or imprisoned and he considers prisons as a smaller community within the world. Thus, the infliction of unnecessary torture and pain cannot be justified and therefore must be prevented and eradicated.…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    September 11, 2001 was a day that changed the lives of the American people forever. Widespread shock, panic, sadness, pain, and despair flooded our nation as a result of the senseless acts of violence inflicted by terrorists. With the nation reeling from the shock and emotions running high, the American people wanted immediate answers and justice. As if a name or a face to tie to this act would somehow ease the pain left in their hearts. This kind of out cry added extra pressure to former President George W. Bush and his administration to act quickly and give the nation’s people the answers they so desperately craved. In an attempt to have speedy answers Former President Bush went out of his way to go beyond the grasp of the judicial system, which strongly enforces writs of habeas corpus. This strategy utilized by the Bush administration has been a topic of much discussion. The following will examine these questions as well as giving a brief history of habeas corpus. It will then explore the suspension of habeas corpus in the United States, give an analysis of the relevancy of habeas corpus, and explain the Supreme Court’s interpretation of habeas corpus. Finally, it will evaluate four different perspectives on habeas corpus.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating captured prisoners. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at “GITMO.” Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments. In 2011, Congress specifically prohibited the expenditure of funds to transfer GITMO prisoners to detention facilities in the continental United States, making it virtually impossible to try them in civilian courts. As of April 2012, 169 remained in detention at GITMO (Sutton, 2012).…

    • 8316 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be deliberate on the history of Habeas Corpus and how it has matured over the years. I will describe the beginning of the Habeas Corpus and the position it takes part in the U.S. and what recent act is being used. The United States Constitution must be more effectively unified into the Guantanamo methods to give equal civil rights to inmates despite what their nationality maybe, but to also have more cordial ways of reviewing obstructive servicemen to absolutely verify if they really should be treated as extremists that we should fear.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Helicher, K (June 1, 2006). Guantanamo and the Abuse of Presidential Power. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/history/printviewfile?accountid=32521…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the opinion piece, A sorry state? Written on 2nd of august 2007, Professor Janice Stevens opposes in an alarmed and critical tone that the treatment of David Hicks in Guantanamo Bay is a violation of human rights and that Australia’s response only shows that other citizens should be scared of themselves being held in such a state. In a sophisticated style the article addresses at an educated adult audience, or to those who are concerned about the treatment of their fellow citizens.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harnoor Chatha Professor Sumstad English-1002-16 October 19, 2014 Rhetorical Analysis Final Draft Deborah Pearlstein author, of Rights in an Insecure World, is the Director of the United States Law and Security Program at Human Rights First. Pearlstein’s purpose is to elaborate and examine different ways our rights are redefined against us after September 11 attack. The Author emphasize her claim about Liberty and Security after September 11 attack on the United States. Author’s intended audience is informing U.S. citizens and criticizing the Government officials (FBI, CIA, and interrogation team at Guantanamo Bay). Author’s main goal is to elaborate and compare how Liberty and Security rights are being violated before and after the September…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people are convinced that Guantanamo Bay should be shut down for a handful of reasons, one of them is that they're not getting treated like they should be, it is also an exorbitant amount of money that us taxpayers pay just to run and keep open, some are in their with no trail no chance to prove their innocence. The people who are locked up in here are one of the world's most dangerous people or so that’s what most of the people on the outside think. The question of shutting it down and moving the prisoners to federal prison in the U.S or just keep the prison where they are running has popped up in many people's minds.…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you ever felt like a piece of cheese on a mouse trap just waiting for that mouse to come by and eat you; maybe even a fly stuck in a spider’s web hoping that you can get away? Well I am sure if I had been one of those people in the mist of the chaos on September 11, 2001 that had changed the life of all Americans’ across the country. I would have felt no bigger than that piece of cheese or that fly caught in the web. We were victims of a horrific terrorist attack that shook the very core of our foundation as a country. Twelve years later we are still recovering from this horrendous act. We have been fighting the war on terror for ten years. This is one of the longest wars that the United States has ever fought. While the war rages on the boundaries between national security and civil liberties are blurred. “The big threat to America is the way we react to terrorism by throwing away what everybody values about our country—a commitment to human rights” (Kennedy, 2007). Individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus does not infringe upon a person’s civil liberties. In addition, habeas corpus allows an individual to question why they are being detained and ensures that detainees have a right to a fair trial; it is considered to be one of the foundations of constitutional democracy.…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Guantanamo Bay detention center remained closed until January 2002, when 20 detainees from Afghanistan were placed in…

    • 3457 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The law of Habeas Corpus was created to permit the guilty to present their case in court and to be tried fairly. In today 's war on terror, the amount of such enemy combatants who were detained indefinitely without any trial has raised. The courts are split up on following the law by the letter or to practically change it according to the situation 's needs. I feel it 's necessary to follow these laws in the same context in which they were written, and the pragmatic approach leaves room for reckless changes. To deny an enemy combatant his or her day in court cannot be justified as taking the pragmatic approach in dealing with war criminals. This paper is an attempt to present the state of law today towards war criminals and the implications of denying the basic right of Habeas Corpus to suspected terrorists.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Extraordinary Rendition

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Many Americans have been appalled by the horrific tales that have occurred at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. Others have questioned whether the U.S. refusal to accept the International Criminal Court pertains to the idea that some Americans may be guilty of war crimes. On top of that, others have wonder why it took so long for President Bush to endorse Senator John McCain’s resolution against the use of torture. More so, some have questioned how the Bush’s legacy continues their impunity.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Getting Away with Torture

    • 7443 Words
    • 30 Pages

    undermined one of the most basic global standards governing how governments can treat people under their control. Contrary to the efforts of…

    • 7443 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics