Preview

Habeas Corpus And War On Terror

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1522 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Habeas Corpus And War On Terror
Habeas Corpus and War on Terror
Latisha Wilson
POL 201
Instructor Keith Carr
01/11/2015

The Habeas Corpus and the War on terror will continue to affect all Americans and those that wage war against America. The effect might not be equal for both but equal rights for all and the fair and speedy trails is there for all individuals. Having the Habeas Corpus in effect helps those that are enemies of America to a fair trial and it also gives America a chance to interrogate and try stop terror. The war on terror presents an erratic challenge for the United States though terrorists are captured and deprived of due process. Several situations between 2004 and 2008 have put a major effect on the Habeas Corpus rule. Habeas Corpus should be in affect because it helps protects all individual’s rights and the Constitution because everyone deserves a fair trial.
The word Habeas Corpus is a Latin meaning you should have the body. The right directed by a judge to some person who is detaining another, commanding him to bring the body of the person in his custody at a specified time to a specified place for a specified purpose. The right’s sole function is to release an individual from unlawful imprisonment; through this use it has come to be regarded as the great writ of liberty. If you can 't arrest someone for what you thing they are going to do. All people are and should be afforded this right. The right tests only whether a prisoner has been accorded due process, not whether he is guilty.
The historical evolution of Habeas Corpus born from the Magna Carta, known as the English bill of Rights began in England in the early 1200’s. Under power from English barons, King John of England placed his signature on the Magna Carta in 1215, in which comprised of a list of human rights and civil liberties. It asserted that the King needed consent from his legislative body to impose taxes upon its citizens. (Halliday 2011) notes that habeas corpus serves as a right and a


References: Boston Marathon Bombings - Facts & Summary - HISTORY.com Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th Edition. Jun2013.p1-1.1p) Levin-Waldman, O.M. (2012). American Government San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education Inc. Creighton Law Review. Apr2009 Vol 42 Issue 3, p447-486.40p. JFQ: Joint Force Quarterly (January 1, 2008). Winter2008, Issue 48, p 14-18. 5p Supreme Court Debates. Sep2004, Vol.7 Issue 6, p 188-192. 5p Sutton, J. (2012, April19). Two Guantanamo Uighur prisoners head to El Salvador. Chicago Tribune News. Halliday, P. (2011, March17). Habeas corpus: From England to Empire C-SPAN. (2010, March27). A&C: Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia & Stephen Breyer
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 201 Week 4 DQ 2 Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 6132 Words
    • 16 Pages

    POL 201 Week 4 DQ 2 Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror. Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating prisoners captured during the conflict. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at “GITMO.” Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments. In 2011, Congress specifically prohibited the expenditure of funds to transfer GITMO prisoners to detention facilities in the continental United States, making it virtually impossible to try them in civilian courts. As of April 2012, 169 remained in detention at GITMO (Sutton, 2012).…

    • 6132 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Challenges Did England Face After The French And Indian War
    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Challenges Did England Face After The French And Indian War

    The writ of habeas corpus is when you get arrested and you say “writ of habeas corpus” to be brought to a judge so he could tell you why you’ve been arrested. If there is no reason to be arrested, then, you are free to leave. It was made for people who didn’t even know why they were sent to jail. They just got arrested one day and didn’t know what they did wrong.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Essay Example
    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror Essay Example

    The historical evolution of habeas corpus born from the Magna Carta, known as the English Bill of Rights began in England in the early 1200s. Under force from English barons, King John of England placed his signature on the Magna Carta in 1215, in which comprised of a list of human rights and civil liberties. It asserted that the King needed consent from his legislative body to impose taxes upon its citizens. Halliday (2011) notes that habeas corpus serves as a writ and a scrabble parchment that a judge ordered a jailer to bring forth a named prisoner to court to face said written charges. This very important document additionally established that trial and due process of law must occur previous to confiscating property or freedom from any free man who resided in England. Instead of King John stepping down from power he agreed to place…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Roman Constitution Influence America
    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did The Roman Constitution Influence America

    “The English common law runs all the way back to Anglo-Saxon days in England, but it did not begin to take shape until late in the twelfth century during the reign of Henry II. It passed into North America with the coming of the first English settlers to the New World, and over the centuries was incorporated into the American system of laws by legislation and judicial decisions.” Two of the most popular documents that prove the influence of the English are the Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights. “What is surprising, and counter to the usual portrayal that there is a strong and direct reliance of the U.S. Bill of Rights on the English heritage, is that only 9 out of the 26 rights in the U.S. Bill of Rights can be traced back to the Magna Carta! Similarly, 7 can be traced to the English Petition of Rights, and 6 to the English Bill of Rights.” Probably the most famous being the right of due process and trial by…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Influences on the Constitution Table
    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Influences on the Constitution Table

    The Magna Carta was a document Issued and signed by Kind John of England in 1215. It was recognized particular natural rights. “The Magna Carta did not declare rights for all Englishmen” (Hall & Feldmeier, 2013).…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Constitution Timeline
    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Constitution Timeline

    The Magna Carta or “The Great Charter” was created by Great Britain in 1215. It consisted of 63 clauses that dealt with the rights, customs, and administration of justice. It was put in place because of King John’s abuse of his people. He created chaos and did inhumane things to his people against the justice system. Only 3 of the original 63 clauses still remain which consist of “the clause confirming the privileges of the city of London and other towns; and the most famous clause of all which states that no free man shall be imprisoned, dispossessed, outlawed or exiled without the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land” (Magna Carta 2008) The others have been replaced by modern laws and the original clauses were put in place so that limits were set on royalty and so that the King adhered to the law just like the rest of the people in Great Britain. This document has an impact on the evolution of the United States Constitution because…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror
    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror

    Habeas Corpus in Latin, means, “You have the body.” According to our text habeas corpus means, “a demand by a court to a jailer to produce the prisoner and announce the charges” (Waldman-Levin, 2012, 5.7). In my opinion for most Americans, habeas corpus protects a prisoner and it also allows a prisoner to indicate that his/her constitution guarantees rights to a fair trial. “From a political point of view, the great value of habeas corpus is that it protects citizens from a dangerous tendency which is generally found in those who exercise the powers of government” (S. G. F., 1888, pg. 454). Habeas corpus is important when it comes to a prisoner questioning why he/she is being held or imprisoned. The Habeas Corpus Act was formed in 1679 and is used to keep an individual from being unlawfully imprisoned.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

    Habeas corpus is located in the United States Constitution in Article One, Section Nine, under congress limits. It says, “The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it”. (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011) Habeas corpus is Latin for “you should have the body”. (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011) It means that the accused most appear in front of a judge and know the charges haled against him or her.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeus Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Civil Liberties, Habeus Corpus and the War on Terror

    Have you ever felt like a piece of cheese on a mouse trap just waiting for that mouse to come by and eat you; maybe even a fly stuck in a spider’s web hoping that you can get away? Well I am sure if I had been one of those people in the mist of the chaos on September 11, 2001 that had changed the life of all Americans’ across the country. I would have felt no bigger than that piece of cheese or that fly caught in the web. We were victims of a horrific terrorist attack that shook the very core of our foundation as a country. Twelve years later we are still recovering from this horrendous act. We have been fighting the war on terror for ten years. This is one of the longest wars that the United States has ever fought. While the war rages on the boundaries between national security and civil liberties are blurred. “The big threat to America is the way we react to terrorism by throwing away what everybody values about our country—a commitment to human rights” (Kennedy, 2007). Individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus does not infringe upon a person’s civil liberties. In addition, habeas corpus allows an individual to question why they are being detained and ensures that detainees have a right to a fair trial; it is considered to be one of the foundations of constitutional democracy.…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Influences on the Constitution
    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Influences on the Constitution

    The Magna Carta was written in 1215. It was the first document to challenge the authority of the king, subjecting him to the rule of the law and protecting nobles from feudal abuse. When Englishmen went to the colonies they were given charters that guaranteed them and their heirs would “have and enjoy all liberties and immunities of free and natural subjects.” The document clearly stated that no free man could be prosecuted by any means other than the law of the land. The Magna Carta’s fundamental rights and principles included due process of law and trial by jury. Taking a cue from the document more than five centuries later, American revolutionaries incorporated many of the Magna Carta's basic ideas into another important piece of parchment – the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Magna Carta Thesis
    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Magna Carta Thesis

    Constitution, a distinctly American invention that became the “gold standard” for world democracies thereafter, contains in its Bill of Rights (especially the Fifth Amendment) language that echoes the Magna Carta’s Article 39: “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.” Reference to the Great Charter has been made many times in the grand conversation of American politics through the years by U.S. presidents (e.g., FDR in his 1941 Inaugural Address) and other great political leaders. Most notably, the Magna Carta has been cited more than 100 times by the U.S. Supreme Court in its opinions and deliberations.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

    Habeas corpus (or writ of Habeas corpus ) is a judicially enforceable order issued by a court of law to a prison official ordering that a prisoner be brought to the court so it can be determined whether or not that prisoner had been lawfully imprisoned and, if not, whether he or she should be released from custody. The right of habeas corpus is the constitutionally bestowed right of a person to present evidence before a court that he or she has been wrongly imprisoned. The rights of writs of habeas corpus are granted in Article I of the Constitution, which…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Habeas Corpus
    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Habeas Corpus

    The law of Habeas Corpus was created to permit the guilty to present their case in court and to be tried fairly. In today 's war on terror, the amount of such enemy combatants who were detained indefinitely without any trial has raised. The courts are split up on following the law by the letter or to practically change it according to the situation 's needs. I feel it 's necessary to follow these laws in the same context in which they were written, and the pragmatic approach leaves room for reckless changes. To deny an enemy combatant his or her day in court cannot be justified as taking the pragmatic approach in dealing with war criminals. This paper is an attempt to present the state of law today towards war criminals and the implications of denying the basic right of Habeas Corpus to suspected terrorists.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The War in Terror
    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The War in Terror

    The writ of Habeas corpus is established for any prisoner that is brought before a judge. The writ justifies the defendant to stand trial. If the defendant denied the trial however, the judge will dismiss the trial. Under the US constitutional law the American celebrates the Habeas corpus liberties under a safe guard to give all terrors a chance to attend their trial. Since, June 2004 and 2008 the Habeas corpus has being change because of matter of the trail and historical interest which lead to the Supreme Court to decide about the trial. Habeas case can interact with three interconnected and they are judicial jurisdiction, ordering their release such as ended the trail if the terror that does not show up for their case, and to see if the terrors are enemy combatant of the United States as when terrors attacks the United States. The noncitizen should hold their trial in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba were the Habeas corpus plays a role in which gives them the authority to stand trial. When congress tried to interfere with the Habeas corpus this is when Boumediene step in and let people know congress interfere with the Suspension Clause of Article 1. Therefore, in the United States the Habeas corpus cannot be suspended unless it invasion the public safety.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Habeas Corpus
    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Habeas Corpus

    The articles that I had researched had touched on a time in 2002, When the supreme court was able to reverse a ruling for a detained alien due to where he was being detained at Guantanamo. There were five men that were detained in Guantanamo and due to the U.S. leases the land from Cuba the rule of they are aliens and did not have the rights as citizen in the United States did not apply to them. The supreme court had to give them the same treatment due to location of the detainees. In 2006 the Military Commissions Act (MCA) this act will eliminate the courts to hear habeas applications from detainees who have been designated (according to procedures established in the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005) They would then petition the courts again stating that this did not pertain to them and if it was unconstitutional that it was then called the Suspension Clause. This Clause basically states that if found to be rebellion and harmful to the public safety shall it be suspended Overall the D.C circuit did rule in both the favor for the detainee and the MCA and Suspension Clause. That basically if you are not in the United States then your rights do not apply in foreign countries.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics