Preview

Habeas Corpus Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1168 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Habeas Corpus Research Paper
Habeas Corpus
David Claxton
Pol 201
Kathryn Looney
February 19, 2014

Habeas Corpus Habeas corpus is a part of the foundation of our government and we should treat even the worst of our enemies within the framework that our Constitution allows. The term “Habeas Corpus” is derived from a Latin term which means “have the body.” Habeas Corpus can be found in history first “in the Magna Carta of 1215 and is the oldest human right in the history of English-speaking civilization. (Rutherford Institute) When it comes to our liberty as citizens of the United States it is one of our most important guarantees. Citizens of the United States under Habeas Corpus have the Constitution backing them and giving them the ability
…show more content…
Rasul. The decision of the court was that the courts of the United States did have the power to determine if enemy combatants were being unlawfully imprisoned. This later led to Congress passing the DTA, or Detainee Treatment Act in 2005, which affords that "no court, justice or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed by an alien detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba" (cfr.org 2005). In 2008 another case came before the Supreme Court who split their decision 5-4 in favor of Boumediene. In Boumediene v. Bush it was decided that detainees at Guantanamo Bay did have the constitutional right to file appeals for Habeas Corpus and claiming that they had no legitimate reason to be detained. (law.cornell.edu) “Petitioners have the constitutional privilege of habeas corpus. They are not barred from seeking the writ or invoking the Suspension Clause’s protections because they have been designated as enemy combatants or because of their presence at Guantanamo.” (law.cornell.edu) According to Jonathan Shaw who published an article entitled The War and the Writ: Habeas corpus and security in an age of terrorism in Harvard Magazine in 2009 “the government sought to prevent habeas review by jailing prisoners beyond the jurisdiction of American courts.” The Supreme Court later decided that while Guantanamo Bay was not on United States soil, it was considered a part of the United States as it was a base leased from Cuba on a permanent

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror. Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating prisoners captured during the conflict. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at “GITMO.” Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments.…

    • 6132 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The writ of habeas corpus is when you get arrested and you say “writ of habeas corpus” to be brought to a judge so he could tell you why you’ve been arrested. If there is no reason to be arrested, then, you are free to leave. It was made for people who didn’t even know why they were sent to jail. They just got arrested one day and didn’t know what they did wrong.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government bureaucracy rebuked Stellar Wind and the executive pushed to get the program in line with American law. In 2004 the Rasul v. Bush decision asserted that non-citizen enemy combatants in Guantanamo Bay could challenge their detention in federal court, thereby putting GTMO within the reach of federal jurisdiction. In the same year, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld authorized that the habeas petition can proceed for Hamdi and the U.S. government could not detain him indefinitely without due process of some kind. Despite these rulings and executive actions, the initial steps taken by members in the White House and the Office of Legal Counsel closely following the attacks on 9/11 were not guided by traditional interpretation of American law. Instead of refitting programs to tailor to American law, officials such as Yoo tailored the American law to fit contentious programs that dramatically diminished the U.S.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This assignment will be to write an opinion paper on civil liberties. Your paper should be 2-3 handwritten pages if turned in during class or 1-2 typewritten pages if placed in the drop box. Your paper will answer the following questions: What if you could only have one of the studied civil liberties? Which one would you choose and why? How would having that civil liberty but no others affect your life? The project should be turned into the drop box no later than Week 2 Saturday at noon.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hedgepeth V. Roberts Case

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Bush, the Court held that federal courts had jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions brought by detainees at the Guantanamo Bay detainment camp. Scalia accused the majority of "spring[ing] a trap on the Executive" by ruling that it could hear cases involving persons at Guantanamo when no federal court had ever ruled that it had the authority to hear cases involving people there. Scalia (joined by Justice John Paul Stevens) also dissented in the 2004 case of Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, involving Yaser Hamdi, an American citizen detained in the United States on the allegation he was an enemy combatant. The Court held that the post-9/11 congressional Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) amounted to authorization for the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus and the Government could continue to detain Hamdi. Scalia wrote that the AUMF could not be read to suspend habeas corpus and that the Court, faced with legislation by Congress which did not grant the President power to detain…

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An assumption made by the Bush administration in selecting this location was that it was beyond the jurisdiction of U.S. courts. The administration wanted to avoid any judicial oversight of how it handled detainees, characterized as “enemy combatants.” A possible legal challenge to indefinite detention with no formal charges or judicial proceedings might arise from the habeas corpus provision of the…

    • 8316 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the government leased that portion of the land from Cuba, for most of its time there was a lack of government oversight (Ryan 14). Some were U.S. citizens and others not (Hoffer 2017). It was possible for the U.S. to have their. In Allan A. Ryan’s book, “The 9/11 Terror Cases: Constitutional Challenges in the War Against Al Qaeda” he explored the 9/11 cases with both historical and legal context. The Unitary Code of Military Justice (1950) established military law and within outlined military commissions (Ryan 88-89). The four detainees in the 9/11 cases were subjected to the UCMJ standards although, a military commission rarely occurs in the United States (Ryan 89). One possible reason for having the cases held in a military court as opposed to the U.S. federal court was that the standards were lower, though similar. Another reason is that the government feared having court cases heard in U.S. federal courts. They could be set free due to insufficient evidence (Hoffer 2017). Plus, the voluntary acceptance of the Geneva Conventions code for treating prisoners during wartime could be ignored since member of Al Qaeda were not included (Ryan…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be deliberate on the history of Habeas Corpus and how it has matured over the years. I will describe the beginning of the Habeas Corpus and the position it takes part in the U.S. and what recent act is being used. The United States Constitution must be more effectively unified into the Guantanamo methods to give equal civil rights to inmates despite what their nationality maybe, but to also have more cordial ways of reviewing obstructive servicemen to absolutely verify if they really should be treated as extremists that we should fear.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habeas Corpus in Latin, means, “You have the body.” According to our text habeas corpus means, “a demand by a court to a jailer to produce the prisoner and announce the charges” (Waldman-Levin, 2012, 5.7). In my opinion for most Americans, habeas corpus protects a prisoner and it also allows a prisoner to indicate that his/her constitution guarantees rights to a fair trial. “From a political point of view, the great value of habeas corpus is that it protects citizens from a dangerous tendency which is generally found in those who exercise the powers of government” (S. G. F., 1888, pg. 454). Habeas corpus is important when it comes to a prisoner questioning why he/she is being held or imprisoned. The Habeas Corpus Act was formed in 1679 and is used to keep an individual from being unlawfully imprisoned.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas corpus is located in the United States Constitution in Article One, Section Nine, under congress limits. It says, “The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it”. (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011) Habeas corpus is Latin for “you should have the body”. (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011) It means that the accused most appear in front of a judge and know the charges haled against him or her.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    First, individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus also known as the “great writ of liberty” guarantees that a person who is being held unjustly can go free (Habeas corpus, 2011). This is one of the reasons that make America so great because anyone who is detained can know the reason why they are being held and in so are allowed due process under the law. The Constitution protects the…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The fifth amendment's privilege not to answer, critics carp, insulates the guilty defendant from revealing his complicity.' While this is true, ironically it also can…

    • 4738 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas corpus is considered to be one of the most fundamental guarantees of personal liberty we have enjoyed as a country since the inception of our Constitution. However, questions have arisen regarding the proper use of habeas corpus and have been brought into focus in the past decade. In the years since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, hundreds of people have been detained by the United States government as part of its war on terror. Most of these detainees face indefinite detention and have neither been charged with a crime nor afforded prisoner of war status. Habeas corpus serves to protect citizens against arbitrary arrest, torture, and extrajudicial killings and is a fundamental personal liberty guaranteed by our Constitution and cannot be suspended based on that fact.…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is another check on the use of government power. The definition of habeas corpus translates to “produce the body.” This is a court order stating to deliver the accused individual to the court issuing the order and to show sufficient and valid reasoning behind the arrest…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Works Cited Ashcroft, John. "Civil Liberties Have Not Been Compromised by the Patriot Act." Current Controversies: America 's Battle Against Terrorism. Andrea C. Nakaya. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. General Business File ASAP. Gale. SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM. 2 December 2008 http://0-find.galegroup.com.mill1.sjlibrary.org:80/ips/start.do?prodId=IPS. Ashcroft, John. "The Patriot Act Does Not Threaten Free Speech." Current Controversies: Free Speech. John Boaz. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM. 2 December 2008 http://0-find.galegroup.co m.mill1 .sjlibrary.org:80/ips/start.do?prodId=IPS. Ashcroft, John. "The U.S. Attorney General Reports on the Patriot Act 's…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays