Hamlet Argumentative Essay

In the conflict of what hamlet was, there were things that hinted to the man he was. At first he was a man who was depressed and angry at the fact that he didn't know how his father passed. His reactions to his tests to see if claudius was the murderer were angry yet good. I believed he then was able to commit to avenge his father. In the last act he killed polonius which was not that hard for him or he didn't feel guilt for killing him. The reason being was he was part of the people who helped Claudius claim the throne and marry his brother's wife. Although he did that he then knew that polonius’s son laertes would come to avenge his father. Hamlet was locked in and ready to avenge his own father. He was no longer depressed and self depreciative to himself. He knew that claudius was not sin free and was able to be killed. The reason being is that he wants claudius to be damned to hell.
Although he knows that claudius needs to die he also knew that he needed to stay within lines because he was religious. When he had the chance to he knew he couldn't because then Claudius would be admitted to heaven. Throughout the acts hamlet was always changing character. He was insane, to depressed, angry, then to finally being ready to kill claudius. He sees himself in many different ways. He felt cowardly and angry in the beginning then converting into a more stable stage where he then is ready to avenge King Hamlet. He puts more obstacles in the way such as killing polonius. It starts out as a single death then later becomes a bloodbath. With the suicide of ophelia it adds more rage to laertes and his desire to kill Hamlet. Hamlet then knows he has limited time as well as a waiting death. Hamlet is a unique character who was unsure of himself and what he had to do. He fought to think clearly on how he could prove that Claudius was the killer of his