In William’s Shakespeare’s Hamlet, characters are utilized to highlight the flaws and discrepancies of others. Through familial duty, actions, and vengeances of the two subplots of Hamlet and Fortinbras, it is evident that both characters are parallel to one another. Fortinbras serves as fail to emphasize aspects of Hamlet’s personality, which enhances plot and character development.…
Throughout William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, there exists an inner struggle among all characters, as to who they are and who they strive to become. Princes of rival nations, Hamlet and Fortinbras, undergo a desire to achieve a greatness to which they feel destined. Through examining these two characters, one can discover the true value of a foil in developing the character’s personality, differentiating the feeling of defeat, and the motives affecting their…
Hamlet (prince of Denmark) can be greatly compared to Laertes (son of a noble), and Fortinbras (prince of Norway) in the play. They all are very similar but yet different at the same time. They all had love and respect for their fathers and felt the need to avenge their deaths, which all were brutally killed. All three believed that the murderers had dishonoured their fathers as well as themselves. They all reacted and took different approaches in attempt to restore honour in their families.…
Fortimbras’ roll in this play is too small that has only be talked about from other people’s words. However, we can still see the opposite characteristics between Hamlet and Fortinbras. Hamlet is aggressive without control while Fortinbras is aggressive with control. After Hamlet knows the murder of his father which has been committed by his uncle he determined to take revenge almost right away without any doubt. In the contrast, Fortinbra obeys his uncle’s order and swear not to invade Norway any more although he is aggressive and good at…
When young Fortinbras was a boy, his father, former king of Norway, gets killed in a battle with King Hamlet, young Hamlet’s father, and loses Norwegian territory which by ended up part of Denmark since King Hamlet won the fight and killed King Fortinbras. Furthermore, young Fortinbras’s uncle, old Norway, takes over the throne instead of giving it to his nephew, young Fortinbras, just as Claudius who also crowns himself when King Hamlet dies. When the play opens, however, the responses of young Fortinbras and young Hamlet depart to completely different directions, which perhaps in masculine and feminine ways. Just as Horatio describes him “of unimproved mettle hot and full” (1.1.97-98), young Fortinbras never really get to know his father, but he blames King Hamlet for the death of King Fortinbras and immediately raises an army called “lawless resolutes” to reclaim Norway’s lost territories. On the other side, Hamlet chooses to stay away from his duties as the only price of Denmark and the successor to the crown. While Fortinbras is training his army and treats Denmark to reclaim their lands and avenge his father, Hamlet has done nothing but complaining about his fate and struggles to kill Claudius even he had a chance to do so. Just from how frightened Hamlet is from his opening phrase of the soliloquy in Nunnery…
And spur my dull revenge. " From reading this you can infer that once Hamlet encountered Fortinbras's army, he was able to resolve his revenge quickly. Both Hamlet and Fortinbras are princes that are seeking their father's revenge, but for these reasons they dislike each other. At the end of the play it is revealed that Fortinbras respects…
In his most famous soliloquy, Hamlet becomes aware that “conscience does make cowards of us all; and thus the native hue of resolution is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought, with this regard their currents turn awry, and lose the name of action.” (3.1. 85-90) Hamlet initially wonders if it's better to put up with the bad things you know about in life than to die. His problem is that he doesn't want to keep on living when Denmark is in this tragic state of decay. In thinking about the unknown that death brings "make cowards of us all,” Hamlet begins to accept what needs to be done. In his final soliloquy, Hamlet addresses the action of young Fortinbras and his bold, seemingly pointless actions. He questions why these men are risking their lives for a rather unimportant piece of land, why he can’t even muster up the courage to do something that has a legitimate point. “What is a man if his chief good and/market of his time be but to sleep and feed? A beast, no more” (4.4. 34-36) He ensues to claim that if men don’t act, but wait for what is desired to happen, they are no more than animals. “I see the imminent death of twenty thousand men, that, for a fantasy and trick of fame, go to their graves liked beds, fight for a plot…O, from this time forth, my thoughts be bloody, or be nothing worth.” (4.4. 60-67) Hamlet, in the end, is finally able to…
His revenge is unique because it is put upon by the nation he leads, Norway. His father, the former King of Norway, was defeated in a fair duel by Hamlet’s father. The loss resulted in the relinquishment of Norwegian land. Now, in an act of honor as the Norway’s leader Fortinbras is obliged by his countrymen to take back what is theirs. His honor is also different to that of Hamlet and Laertes because it is not as hell-bent on murder as the tasks asked of the other two sons. Fortinbras task is less of a duty of a son to his father, but more of a king to his…
A great number of lessons can be learned from Hamlet by Shakespeare. A very important lesson is that not everyone wants a leader, but every kingdom needs one. What is meant by this is that in a kingdom there will always be people who are not in favor of the person in charge. However, in a functioning kingdom a strong leader is of essence. The arrival of Fortinbras in Act 5 Scene 2 of Hamlet is clear evidence that Shakespeare was in hopes of a noble leader replacing Elizabeth. Shakespeare believed that corruption was swarming in the state of England, and a noble leader was needed to replace her.…
Mark Twain once stated, “It is curious - curious that physical courage should be so common in the world, and moral courage so rare.” The zealous struggles between internal and external gratification and somatic and ethical honour have incontrovertibly led to man’s continual battle for integrity – pride versus ethics. Religious teachings impart that one show respect to all and utilize the power of oration to convey ideologies; yet religious crusades have instigated the bloodiest and most deadly battles in human history. Man’s universal and timeless question asks whether it is ethical to defend one’s honour through brutality or if the use of language and moral lessons are sufficient to deliver the message. Analogously, William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Hamlet bequeaths enlightenment to its audience of the universal beauties and faults of mankind on the comprehensive debate of integrity. The tragic hero, Prince Hamlet of Denmark, vies to comprehend his uncomfortably altered environment, while he relentlessly endeavors to seek morality, logic, and reason in a world where corruption and greed autonomously dictate action. His mother’s precipitous remarriage, the tormenting death of his father, and the forsakenness Hamlet feels from those he held close lead him to render epiphanic cognizance. Shakespeare’s use of soliloquys bestows unto the audience a voyeuristic view into Hamlet’s personal meditations, highlighting Hamlet’s introspective state. Though his vulnerability and pathos at times render him ineffectual and indecisive, it is purely reflective of his humanity and that is what entices him to the audience. Hamlet is in an internal battle with the imperfections of the world around him. In the hypocritical nation of Denmark, Hamlet is thrust into witnessing indecencies, both externally and in his own home; thus Hamlet’s lack of action is conjured not by feebleness of character. It is the moral contradictions and…
In turn, one may feel that the only way to relieve the negative feelings is to seek revenge and kill the person whom one blames for them. Hamlet clearly shows a deep love for his father, and he is utterly heart-broken over his death, especially after seeing his uncle take his place. Therefore, when his father 's ghost informs him that it is a murderer, not a snake, who is responsible for his death, Hamlet immediately responds: "Haste me to know [who], that I, with wings a swift / As meditation or thoughts of love, / May sweep to my revenge." (Hamlet, I, V, 35-37) He does not even know whom he has to kill yet, but he is already sure that he must avenge his father, no matter the cost. Hamlet is so lost without his father, he needs somewhere to place the blame for his death. Thus, when this opportunity arises he endeavours to seize it in an attempt to avenge his father, and alleviate his own heartache as well. Fortinbras, too, seeks revenge for his father 's death. However, unlike Hamlet, he does not have a ghost to incite him, only thirty years of hatred and anger toward the ruler of Denmark. He spends his whole life trying to win back the land his father lost to the Danes, take vengeance for Old Fortinbras, and regain dignity for him and his people. When, finally, he storms the castle to assume the throne and the "... rights of memory [he has] in this…
Those he befriended know that what Hamlet valued above gold and silver was loyalty. He never expected to gain it from you because of his title but because he earned it through his personality and his steely resolve, even in his darkest hours, to endeavour to live his life according to his vales. It was Hamlet, who I regard as my dearest friend that taught me to always love family and friends, always take and interest in people and to stay loyal to the state of Denmark. These were his values and it was those that he died defending. This, among his many other virtues, made him a true friend to all in the state of…
Repetition of certain words “Rightly to be great is not to stir without great argument, but greatly to find quarrel in a straw when honour’s at stake” like “great” emphasizes that honor is an important aspect in a man’s life, and should be able to uphold it even in the ordinary arguments (IV.iv.53-56). He questions his purpose after seeing Fortinbras: “Now, whether it be bestial oblivion, or some craven scruple of thinking too precisely on the event, a thought which, quarter’d, hath but one part wisdom and ever three parts coward, I do not know why yet I live to say ‘this thing’s to do’” Prince Hamlet questions why he’s alive if he can’t live up to being like Fortinbras (IV.iv.39-44). He agrees that there should be a reason why he was alive: “Sure, he that made us with such large discourse, looking before and after, gave us not that capability and god-like reason to fust in us unused” (IV.iv.36-39). Prince Hamlet agrees that there should be a reason for his existence and figures out that his existence is to take revenge for his dead father, but he takes into consider what might happen because of it.…
After what happened here today in Elsinore, I'm quiet sure that you're probably confused and full of sadness. Some of the people who died here today deserve to be remembered, whereas others do not. I'm here to tell you the real story of what happened and how it led to these many deaths.…
The play, Hamlet, by William Shakespeare is a tragic story about a prince named Hamlet attempting to get revenge for his father's murder. As Hamlet only to slowly destroy his life in the process. As Hamlet attempts to get revenge, he ultimately ends up destroying himself and the people around him. But before his death, Hamlet slowly decides what he wants to do with his life. Hamlet goes from thinking the world holds nothing for him but not wanting to kill himself because he fears god in the first Soliloquy, to living to avenge his father if needed in the second Soliloquy, to fearing death in the third Soliloquy. Hamlet slowly decides what he wants to do with his life, through his first three Soliloquies in the play…