By
Matt Greenfield
In the play Hamlet: Prince of Denmark by William Shakespeare three of the characters are faced with avenging their fathers’ deaths, which are Hamlet, Laertes, and Fortinbras. These three character’s actions are guided solely by their emotions to take revenge on their father’s deaths. Even though all three of these characters get their revenge, Fortinbras is the only one to make it out alive. Hamlet with his hesitance, Laertes with his rashness, and Fortinbras with his deceitful planning all had their own reason, method, and outcome for their revenge of their fathers. Hamlet’s hesitance to revenge his father is the most detailed revenge in the play of all the characters. Upon his arrival to Denmark to claim his kingdom, Lord Hamlet is informed that his mother is marring his father’s brother. Hamlet soon then finds out that it was his uncle that killed his father to take his place as king “Thus was [Hamlet’s Father], sleeping, by a brother’s hand/ Of life, of crown, of queen, at once dispatch’d” (1. 5. 75-76). Feeling his father’s pain, Hamlet pretend his uncle is near “So, uncle, there you are. Now to my word;/ It is “Adieu, adieu! Remember me.”” swearing this as he’s furious with anger (1. 5. 111-112). Knowing this, Hamlet devises a clever but hesitant plan to avenge his father and take back his kingdom as the rightful heir of his father’s throne. Firstly Hamlet decides that he will give the impression he’s mad or sick. Telling his only trustworthy friend no matter “How strange or odd” he acts, he assures him it’s all a part of the plan (1. 5. 171). Knowing that Polonius reports to the king and queen on everything, Hamlet goes to Polonius daughter Ophelia to act out his craziness and start the rumors of his madness. Hamlet then finds an actor for a play that’s going to be shown and ask him to “study a speech of some dozen or sixteen lines/ which [he] would set down and insert” in to the play (2. 2. 545-546). Adding these extra lines, Hamlet is trying to show the audience what really happened to King Hamlet and get a reaction out of his uncle and mother. Hamlet then informs his uncle that the name of the play is “The Mouse-trap” to deepen his uncle’s thoughts on this matter, which is Hamlet’s way of showing that he knows what happen, but at the same is not a smart move on his part (3. 2. 239). Hesitant Hamlet finds his uncle luckily praying at an alter, later on in act three, giving him the perfect chance to kill his uncle, but decides to kill him “When he is drunk asleep, or in his rage” (3. 4. 89). Hamlet’s plan comes to a short pause when he takes a short trip to England for mistakenly stabbing Polonius thinking it‘s his uncle or someone spying on him and his mother. Resuming upon his return, Hamlet is forced to fight Laertis. The outcome of Hamlet’s revenge was not at all what he intended, but he had his revenge none the less. Sending his two best friends from childhood (Rosencrantz and Guildenstern) to their deaths, hamlet felt no regret for they had been helping his uncle. Hamlet had lost his mother, from his uncle’s thirst for power, and the love of his life, Ophelia, due to Lord Hamlet acting crazy and not talking to her. At the cost of all his loved ones bloodshed, Hamlet took his revenge by forcing his uncle to drink the same poison that took his mother’s life and hearing his last words “follow my mother” (5. 2. 329). Laertis’ rash reason for revenge of his father, Polonius, is blamed solely on Hamlet. Worried about spies, Hamlet is quick to react and kill Laertis’ father after hearing “What, ho! Help!” from behind a curtain (3.4. 23). Laertis also blames Hamlet for the death of his sister, Ophelia, who had killed herself after father being killed and thinking that Hamlet was mad and had no love for her. Working with the Laertis, the king comes up with a plan to kill Hamlet. They decide that Laertis will challenge Hamlet to a fencing match upon his return. With no chance for Hamlet to decline, Laertis must honor his father. Little does Hamlet know that, Laertis’ sword will be dipped in poison so deadly that if “it draws blood no [plaster] so rare,/ Collected from all [herbs] that have virtue/ Under the moon, can save the thing for death” (4. 7. 143-145). While Hamlet lies there and dies, everyone will think it was a mishap where “no wind of blame shall breath” and “even his mother shall uncharged the practice/ And call it accident” (4. 7. 65-67). Ending the life of Hamlet, Laertis will have his revenge while being used by the king at the same time. Laertis’ plan for the revenge of his father seems flawless but the outcome proves otherwise from his rash actions. Not being able to land a hit on Hamlet, Laertis wounds Hamlet at the end of one of the rounds. Leading to a scuffle, Hamlet somehow ends up with the poisoned sword and wounding Laertis as crowd tries to “Part them!” (5. 2. 306). Avenging his father and sister by killing Hamlet, Laertis signed his own death certificate with the poisoning of his own sword. Fortinbras on the other hand has deceivingly planned the revenge of his father ever since Old Hamlet killed Old Fortinbras, which happen to be the day Hamlet was born. Old Hamlet had “slay this Fortinbras” leader of Norway at the time and seized some of their land (1. 1. 86). With Norway missing some land, Fortinbras wanted to take it back and kill Hamlet as revenge and to honor his father. Fortinbras had been planning to take back his land and avenge his father. Letting Fortinbras “[gather] up a list of lawless [desperadoes]” in the outskirts of Norway, his uncle thought they were “To be a preparation ‘gainst the Polack” (1, 2. 1, 2. 98, 63). Fortinbras’s uncle soon found out what he was really planning and demanded that he shall go with the plan “as before, against the Polack” (2. 2. 75). They sent a message to Hamlet’s uncle asking for a “quiet pass/ Through [their] dominions for this enterprise” (2. 2. 77-78). Even though Fortinbras’ plans were to attack Denmark when they arrive, he deceives his uncle to secure his revenge. Fortinbras gain his revenge without lifting a finger and with no bloodshed of his men. Hamlet tells Horatio right before he dies that “[he] do prophesy th’ election lights/ On Fortinbras” (5. 2. 358-359). Showing up at the end to see his enemies die, Fortinbras was handed his land back. Fortinbras wasn’t able to avenge his father himself, but he reclaimed his land and forgave Hamlet. Being the only one to survive in this deadly game of revenge, Fortinbras gives Hamlet a royal burial. Hamlet, Laertis, and Fortinbras all had their own reason, method, and outcome for the revenge of their fathers. Leading to two of their downfalls, Hamlet and Laertis choices were wrongly guided by their emotions. In the end they all received what they really wanted, but with only Fortinbras still living. In saying that if you ever going look for revenge be sure to dig two graves, unless you’re Fortinbras.
Works Cited
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet: Prince of Denmark. Rpt. In The Bedford Introduction to Drama. 6th Ed. Lee A. Jacobus. St. Martin’s Press: New York, NY, 2009. 340-390.
Cited: Shakespeare, William. Hamlet: Prince of Denmark. Rpt. In The Bedford Introduction to Drama. 6th Ed. Lee A. Jacobus. St. Martin’s Press: New York, NY, 2009. 340-390.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Throughout the play, Hamlet, written by William Shakespeare, various characters seek for revenge, including protagonist, prince Hamlet. While he seeks for revenge for his father since his uncle disgracefully killed him, Hamlet murders Polonius, the father of his friend, Laertes, causing an avengeful domino effect. Hamlet has to face many obstacles, including his own indecisive mind, to take action for his father and the revenge obligations of Laertes and Polonius parallel the plot.…
- 583 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, the theme of revenge is very palpable as the reader examines the characters of Hamlet himself, as well as Laertes, son of Polonius, and Fortinbras, prince of Norway and son of the late King Fortinbras. Each of these young characters felt the need to avenge the deaths of their fathers who they felt were untimely killed at the bloody hands of their murderers. However, the way each chose to go about this varies greatly and gives insight into their characters and how they progress throughout the play.…
- 1346 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Hamlet (prince of Denmark) can be greatly compared to Laertes (son of a noble), and Fortinbras (prince of Norway) in the play. They all are very similar but yet different at the same time. They all had love and respect for their fathers and felt the need to avenge their deaths, which all were brutally killed. All three believed that the murderers had dishonoured their fathers as well as themselves. They all reacted and took different approaches in attempt to restore honour in their families.…
- 1027 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Shakespearean play, Hamlet, is a story of revenge and the way the characters in the play respond to grief and the demands of loyalty. The importance of Fortinbras and Laertes in the play is an issue much discussed, analysed and critiqued. Fortinbras and Laertes are parallel characters to Hamlet, and they provide pivotal points on which to compare the actions and emotions of Hamlet throughout the play. They are also important in Hamlet as they are imperative to the plot of the play and the final resolution. Hamlet, Laertes and Fortinbras are three young men who are placed in similar circumstances, that is, to avenge their father's deaths. The way the each comes to terms with their grief and how they rise to the call of vengeance is one of main contrasts between the three.…
- 1323 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Hamlet, Prince of Denmark has remained the most perplexing, as well as the most popular, of William Shakespeare’s tragedies. Whether considered as literature, philosophy, or drama, its artistic stature is universally admitted. To explain the reasons for its excellence in a few words, however, is a daunting task. Apart from the matchless artistry of its language, the play’s appeal rests in large measure on the character of Hamlet himself. Called upon to avenge his father’s murder, he is compelled to face problems of duty, morality, and ethics that have been human concerns through the ages. The play has tantalized critics with what has become known as the Hamlet mystery, that of Hamlet’s complex behavior, most notably his indecision and his reluctance to act.…
- 1773 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
Shakespeare’s Hamlet has many themes such as Impossibility of Certainty, The mystery of Death. But the basic theme would be Revenge. Revenge, in Hamlet, serves as the driving force of the play. The main character of the play, Hamlet, is always obsessed with the revenge for his father’s death. This obsession leads to the actions he performs and eventually to his death. Hamlet just wants the revenge to be perfect. He even spares the life of King Claudius even when he had the opportunity to kill him just because he thinks that if he killed him then, his revenge wouldn’t be perfect. “Now might I do it pat, now he is praying; And now I'll do't. And so he goes to heaven; And so am I revenged" (3.3.73-75). Whatever Hamlet does in the play, he does it in order to avenge his father’s death.…
- 1437 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
He is often wordy and speaks more than any other character but, what he says and what he does are two different things. He is in constant deliberation with himself and even when alone (or seemingly alone), his soliloquies are used to remind himself of his plan, to check facts, evaluate himself in his role, or input newly found information. His plan actually counts on being watched almost all the time. This is calculated as he will be seen as more mad if he is also mad when he is alone. The idea that he may be more honest when alone is a manipulation and therefore an action. He is baiting the other characters at almost all times even going so far as to openly accuse them of their crimes. He calls Polonius a “fishmonger” (II ii 174) and asks him if he has a daughter even though he knows that Ophelia is he daughter. Confused, Polonius is further convinced of Hamlet’s madness. Hamlet also makes Gertrude take responisibility for her role in the corruption of Denmakrk. Having planted the seed that makes her take responsibility, he no longer has any responsibility for her actions. He has let revenge take its course, but he is not actually responsible for her death. He does not kill his own mother, but he must let revenge happen. His carefully planted manipulations work like a charm. Though she doesn’t actually take her own life, Hamlet has calculated her reactions perfectly and the murder/suicide of the Gertrude seems to be somewhat understood by both characters. It is actually Hamlet’s words that killed her, not his…
- 1753 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
For Hamlet, it is death and only death that can avenge his father’s murder. While Hamlet’s tragic flaw is his inability to act on these emotions (one could easily argue that King Claudius’ death comes as a result of his own plot backfiring), it is death that inspires the powerful and conflicting emotions of revenge within Hamlet.…
- 1716 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Shakespeare, William, Barbara A. Mowat, and Paul Werstine. The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. New York: Washington Square, 2002. Print.…
- 2083 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
Shakespeare, William, Barbara A. Mowat, and Paul Werstine. The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. New York: Washington Square, 2002. Print.…
- 1015 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Cited: Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. MIT. 15 Jan. 2009 .…
- 671 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
His revenge is unique because it is put upon by the nation he leads, Norway. His father, the former King of Norway, was defeated in a fair duel by Hamlet’s father. The loss resulted in the relinquishment of Norwegian land. Now, in an act of honor as the Norway’s leader Fortinbras is obliged by his countrymen to take back what is theirs. His honor is also different to that of Hamlet and Laertes because it is not as hell-bent on murder as the tasks asked of the other two sons. Fortinbras task is less of a duty of a son to his father, but more of a king to his…
- 738 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In Shakespear’s Hamlet, a theme of revenge is shown throughout the play in which each character seeks out differently. The two polar opposites being Prince Hamlet and Prince Fortinbras are often discussed due to their different methods of action or in Hamlet’s case, no action. Assuming one has read the play, in the end, we are left with Hamlet’s dying wish for Fortinbras to be King. Because there is not anyone left to take the throne, the audience is expected to accept the fact that Fortinbras will be king and everything will be okay. The play has no conclusion; therefore, the future of Denmark is left to the audience’s imagination. The simplest argument is that because Fortinbras is a man of action, one assumes he will make a great king despite…
- 1210 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The main character, Hamlet, shows his loyalty to his father, growing angry at the fact that he was murdered by his uncle. When his father asks Hamlet to take revenge on Claudius, Hamlet becomes enraged and his willingness to take revenge becomes revealed. “Ghost: Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder. Hamlet: Murder? Ghost: Murder most foul, as in the best it is But this most foul strange and unnatural. Hamlet: Haste me to know’t, that I, with wings as swift, As meditation or the thoughts of love, May sweep to my revenge.” (Shakespeare pg.29 Act I, Scene 5). Hamlet stays loyal to his father’s memory through the whole novel, seeking revenge on Claudius until he is able to kill him, accomplishing this task as he dies alongside…
- 3332 Words
- 14 Pages
Good Essays -
Cited: New Oxford American Dictionary 3rd edition 2010 by Oxford University press, Inc. Print Shakespeare, William. “Hamlet, Prince of Denmark” Introduction To Literature, ed/ by Kathleen Shain Cai, et. al. New York: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2011. Print…
- 630 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays