One of Hamlets main dilemmas is that he is forced into getting revenge on his uncle for killing his father, marrying his mother, and ultimately becoming king. However, due to Hamlets inability to turn his action into thoughts, this revenge was severely delayed. This inability is a result of his conflict between his physical and inner self, the former being thoughtful and contemplative, while the latter is rash and impulsive. The clash between his personalities often results in the accomplishment of nothing. Although this uncertainty is the main theme of the play, it also portrays Hamlet as a man incapable of making decisions in times of need.
Another thing that judges Hamlets measure as a man is his madness. Whether his madness is deliberate or actual is questionable. Hamlet believes that his madness is just a façade to deter the others of his real intentions. Somewhere in the middle of the play, the readers are confused of whether Hamlet is truly crazy or just acting. It is understandable for a person to take risks to get things done, but there are also times where it is too much and has the opposite effect. In this case, Hamlet tries his best to get revenge on Claudius but due to his implied insanity, he is responsible for the death of Polonius, Ophelia, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, Laertes and Gertrude. If Hamlet had just killed Claudius at the first chance he got, then he could have spared the other six lives. Polonius dies because he was spying on Hamlets madness, while Ophelia drowns due to Hamlets madness. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern dies because of Hamlets madness that made Claudius fear his own life. Gertrude entangles with all of this because she is Hamlets mother and is worries about him. Hamlets madness is unnecessary to his goal and is a completely bad choice on his behalf.
Throughout the play, Hamlet has faced problems that nobody would ever want to encounter. Although Hamlet eventually gets his revenge on Claudius by killing him, many lives were wasted in the process. His inaction and his supposed madness interfere with his plans and often make his plans haywire. During his problems, the reader can see that Hamlet is determined to carry out his thoughts, but never actually does so until the end. This hesitant idiosyncrasy of Hamlet also one of the reasons why Hamlet goes mad. Only in challenge and controversy, do we see what Hamlet really is, an immature young boy.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
According to Martin Luther King Jr. “the ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience ,but where he stands in times of challenge and controversy.” This quote is basically saying that you can’t judge a person when they're in their comfort zone. That in times of Great threat and dispute, you can see if that person is capable or strive for victory. Through the use of characterization and conflict, this quote is shown to be true in the plays of The Crucible and Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller. In these two play, the characters were forced out of their comfort zone due to the situation they were in and during that they made sacrifices to save themselves or others.…
- 547 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
After his father’s death, Hamlet is in a frustrated state where he relapses into suicidal misery. It is in this state of mind that he meets the ghost of his father and learns of his “foul and most unnatural murther” (Shakespeare 1388). He then vows revenge on his Uncle for murdering him. Hamlet pretends to be insane so that he can calculate his moves according to the situation at hand. Some characters come to realize that he is not mad. In Act III Scene I, Claudius states that Hamlet’s actions although strange “lack’d for a little, was not like madness” (Shakespeare 1417). While confronting his mother, Gertrude, Hamlet goes into such a wild rage that he kills Polonius believing him to be the king. This action was rash when just before confronting his mother he hesitates and does not kill Claudius while he is praying. The erratic action of killing innocent Polonius, eventually leads to his death in the final scene. Laertes, Polonius’s son, and Claudius then plan on murdering Hamlet for killing Polonius. After Hamlet learns of Ophelia’s death, he gets into a confrontation with Laertes. In the…
- 1127 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Freudian critics have located Hamlet’s motivation in the psychodynamic triad of the father-mother-son relationship. According to this view, Hamlet is disturbed and eventually deranged by his Oedipal jealousy of the uncle who has done what, Freud claimed, all sons long to do themselves. Other critics have taken the more conventional tack of identifying as Hamlet’s tragic flaw the lack of courage or moral resolution. In this view, Hamlet’s indecision is a sign of moral ambivalence that he overcomes too late.…
- 1773 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
Hamlet was never truly insane, he was much too brilliant. He was simply putting on an act for the kingdom of Elsinore. If it were not for Hamlet’s feigned insanity, Claudius would have surely known that Hamlet was scheming against him and would have executed him. In society today, this is a common occurrence. If someone seems insane, they can get away with nearly everything. For example, if an individual today were to commit a petty crime, they would face adequate punishment. On the other hand, if an individual today were to kill another individual and plead for insanity in a court of law, they would receive little to no punishment. Hamlet manipulated this fact well throughout the play. Although he committed murder and was not actually insane, he can be forgiven. Hamlet acknowledged that he could not avenge his father without committing murder. He accepted that he had to be evil in order to counter evil. Hamlet had every right to kill Claudius especially after he became aware of Claudius’ and Laertes’ plan to murder him, and even more so after the poison meant to kill him was ingested by his mother Gertrude. If Hamlet had not acted insane, Claudius would have known that Hamlet knew the truth. Like Hamlet said, “The plays the thing, wherein I’ll catch the conscience of the King”…
- 1634 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Hamlet could be considered a brilliant actor, only if you believe that he is not insane, he was not! Hamlet was always the smartest person in the room, whether he was two steps ahead of someone of one step behind, he always knew what to do. It can easily be interpreted that Hamlet is acting insane just to not leave a trail for anyone to follow. Hamlet opens up to the Horatio and Marcellus and tells them that he will act mad: “How strange or odd soe’er I bear myself—As I, perchance, hereafter shall think meet To put an antic disposition on” (1.5.177). Hamlet is clearly doing this so Claudius will not see him as a threat and will think of him as harmless. Hamlet is insane while actually sane. This is a perfect example of Hamlet being the smartest person in the room, as well as a perfect example of how madness shaped the play. If Hamlet did not act mad Claudius could have seen him as a threat much earlier and attempted to kill him much earlier. Even to the reader Hamlet seems insane, remember the reader knows what Hamlet is thinking. What Hamlet decides to do is “pronounced to be so atrocious and horrible, as to be unfit to be put into the mouth of a human being.” (Coleridge 4). Hamlet here has the reader believing that he is insane, however he could just be blinded by rage…
- 964 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
He is very kept to himself at the beginning of the play but very slowly comes to show his true colors. Just like many insane horror movie monsters and murderers Hamlet seems very quiet until something in him snaps and causes him to go insane. Kind of how many actual real life murders happen. Hamlet also shows this by murdering anything on a whim. For example, when he murders Polonius on a whim because he is on edge that could be a sign that he is psychotic. It would show that he could be a murderer because he has almost no remorse for the murder of Polonius. Hamlet also murders the horrible King Claudius brutally. When Hamlet got the chance he viciously and brutally murders Claudius. He kills him by putting a cup of poison down his throat in a cold-blooded manner. If Hamlet were to go on a murder spree and commit multiple murders that he would have no remorse for, then he would easily reach status of murderer. Hamlet would be a murderer and he would be infamous for being known as the young man who killed…
- 1326 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Hamlet clearly demonstrates how insane he is after killing Polonius and showing no remorse for his death. Right before Hamlet entered the chamber to talk to his mother, Polonius explains to the queen that he will be hiding and ease dropping on their conversation, to find out the real reason for Hamlet erratic behavior. Hamlet enters the chamber, on a rampage after finding Claudius guilty of killing his father and also seeing him trying to pray. Hamlet goes off on his mother when she says, “Hamlet, thou hast thy father much offended” (l. 10). That also triggered his anger to the point where the queen feared for her life and as told to do so, she yelled for help. Polonius tries to come out from behind the curtain and before you know it, he was stabbed by Hamlet. At this point, after he stabbed Polonius, killing him, Hamlet first thought it was Claudius that was hiding behind the curtain. Later finding out it was Claudius, Hamlet says, “A bloody dead-- almost as bad, good mother, as killing a king, and marry with his brother” (l. 27-28). You would think that Hamlet would be scared for his life after realizing he killed someone. Not Hamlet, he just continues on with his conversation with the queen about how crazy it is that she remarried so soon. Hamlet showing no remorse for killing someone shows that he is not mental stable and doesn’t realize what just happened.…
- 632 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Hamlet only owns up to his madness because it buys him time to stay and perform actions if he didn't then he would not have been allowed to stay for such a long while. His "madness" is keeping people from taking his actions seriously. This seems to be part of his initial plan. This plan is first mentioned when he asks Horatio and Marcellus not to make any remarks in relation to his "antic disposition (1.5.192)." Hamlet's madness allows him to talk to Claudius, Gertrude, Ophelia, and Polonius in a manner that no prince would ever be allowed to speak in. Hamlet is often disrespectful and insulting in his remarks. Although his acting backfires during his speech to Gertrude, Hamlet is able to severely criticize her for the actions she has done because she thinks he is insane. During the play he also makes many sexual hints and even obvious sexual remarks towards Ophelia such as "That's a fair thought to lie between maids' legs (3.2.125)." His convincing insanity act gives him the chance to vent his anger towards Ophelia for her rejection. In another scene, he is able to tell Polonius his true feelings through his appearance. Polonius deciding to "take leave" of Hamlet, Hamlet replies, "You cannot, take from me anything that I will more willingly part withal (2.2.233)." Hamlet uses his madness as almost an excuse, and definitely…
- 1500 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Hamlet fails to keep his sanity, which leads to catastrophe. His father even made an effort into mentioning, “But, howsoever thou pursuest this act/Taint not thy mind…” (3.4. 91, 92). The Ghost knew that the task laid before Hamlet would not be as simple as it would for another 14th century man. Everything Hamlet did consisted of well thought out speculation. Although Shakespeare message isn’t implicit, everything from the way characters speak and act is done for a reason. This not only foreshadows what is to become of Hamlet, but also hints to the audience that the level of his sanity adds to the result of what his father was implying. However, this madness wasn’t developed purely because Hamlet had intended it to but because of the suspicions he was coming more in contact with. One by one, all of the people Hamlet trusts and loves in his life were slowly, in his opinion, turning against him. First it began with Claudius’ ruthless killing of his father, which was quickly followed by the disturbing marriage to his mother. With this, the intentions of his friends and even…
- 1315 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
But when Ophelia chooses her loyalty to her father over Hamlet that antagonizes him and he questions and degrades her. This is where we start seeing Hamlet sanity degrading and his insanity starting to empower him. Hamlet then interacts with Gertrude, whom he’s enraged at because he believes that she betrayed him and his father and played a part in his father and her former husband’s death. In his fuming anger he stabs Polonius violently thinking that it was the King. This is when Hamlet has lost his sense of reality and his act of insanity doesn’t remain just an act anymore. Hamlet gravely harms both Ophelia and Gertrude with his words of insanity, which were all unnecessary because ultimately they were innocent but Hamlet doesn’t even appear to be ridden with guilt nor does the thought of apologizing even cross his mind, all because he believes that his act of insanity will help him get the revenge that he’s obligated to get for his deceased father. His actions of insanity result in Polonius being sent to his grave but…
- 877 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
His failure with the loss of his life is what actually gives the work its meaning. The audience is able to see that this work is about the pointlessness of revenge; revenge consumes a person and destroys their way of life. The reader sees that although Claudius is in the wrong as well, that taking the law into one’s own hands consumes a person. One must work within an established system to accomplish their goals, not attempt to fulfill Hammurabi’s Code of old. While many consider Hamlet’s hubris of indecisiveness as his downfall, that reason and logic is what actually kept him alive. One must be sure of one’s choices before acting, not act out of blind rage and emotion. Had Hamlet been even more decisive, he might have been able to realize the error in his ways. Revenge became the most important thing in Hamlet’s life; taking away someone else’s life was more important than living his to the fullest. In the play Hamlet, Shakespeare shows that revenge consumes a person’s life, as shown through Hamlet’s failure, and is all in all the wrong act to…
- 535 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Hamlet may be acting crazy but he does so for a cause to fool others into thinking he is mad so they do not suspect him. He is cunning and a genius because no one suspects that he plotting a revenge against Claudius for murdering his father. He is moral, thoughtful, forgiving, determined, diplomatic and attentive. These qualities make him a loved prince by the people of Denmark, but he also has tragic flaws. His inability to act, or hesitation makes his plan backfire on him. After many attempts of revenge, Claudius eventually figures out that Hamlet is plotting against him. He hires Rosencrantz and Guildenstern and Polonius helps him spy…
- 749 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Early on in Hamlet, a guard slightly mentions that there is "something rotten in the state of Denmark" (Shakespeare, I.iv.90). The tranquility of Denmark is suddenly shattered by Claudius's marriage to Gertrude, Hamlet's mother, only a short time following the death of King Hamlet. To Hamlet was revealed the murder of his father and becomes determined to avenge his father's death no matter the cost. This sets off a trail of pretending, backstabbing, plotting, luring, and deadly accidents that ultimately lead to a clash of hatred between the characters and the doom of Denmark. Shakespeare animates the characters with these sinful deeds and vengeance to illustrate that these corruptions strips the innocence and sanity in human kind. Had Hamlet not gone on a tangent and lost his mind about the murder of his father, there might not have been a domino effect of madness knocking down everyone else in this royal chain. Hamlet pretends to have apparently become mad at the beginning, but apparently becomes mad near the end as this obsessive vengeance engulfs him. This disease spreads to Olivia and she becomes insane after her father is accidentally killed by Hamlet then kills herself shortly afterwards. This lead to even more anger upon Laertes, the son of Polonius, who is now driven by madness to kill Hamlet. Everything deriving from this act of treason from Claudius proves that madness is the drive that sends the characters into…
- 850 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Had Hamlet killed Claudius when he had the chance, the drama would have stopped there and no one would have had to know about it. E3 After Hamlet notices how good the players are, he says to himself, “I’ll have these players play something like the murder of my father…I’ll catch the conscience of the king” (2.2.623-635). I3 Hamlet, doubting himself again, is not sure whether the ghost he saw was his late father’s or a devil that took the shape of his father. He intended to find out and by doing this, it supported his downfall ever more. C All these reasons prove that Hamlet had many tragic flaws that led to his downfall. Hamlet is a weak person in general and was not never for a task like revenge. Hamlet kept on doubting himself and even went into other ideas like killing himself during the process. In today’s world, important people, like hamlet, do bad thing for many reasons and sometimes it leads to their downfall. The whole idea has gotten very sensitive for famous people because one flaw or fault, and some of these celebrities careers are…
- 374 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.” What he meant by this is that the character of a person cannot be judged by his or her actions when they are at ease, but only when they are confronted with something that is not dealt with on a daily basis. Only a person’s reaction to a challenge or obstacle can allow their true nature to be seen. The novel “Night”, by Elie Wiesel, can prove the truth of this quote in numerous ways.…
- 608 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays