In the beginning of Hamlet King Hamlet's ghost pays a visit to Prince Hamlet. The ghost tells Hamlet that while "sleeping in [his] orchard, a serpent stung [him]." He then tells Hamlet "the serpent that did sting thy father's life now wears his crown." Hamlet, who already suspected his father's death to be murder, is furious upon learning that it was not only murder, it was his father's uncle that committed the act of treachery. In a rage of fury Hamlet swears to the ghost of his father that he will seek vengeance on Claudius, for his sake and that of his father's.
This is very similar in Gladiator when Commodus kills his father, the Roman Emperor, Marcus Aurelius. Maximus, a Roman General, was very close with Marcus who told Maximus "he [was] the son [he] should have had..." and wanted Maximus to carry on as Emperor instead of his son Commodus. Maximus seeks vengeance on Commodus not only for murdering Marcus, but also because he murdered Maximum's wife and eight-year-old son.
In both cases Claudius and Commadus wanted to reign, to have power; in both cases they were not meant to have it. Hamlet was the "heir to the throne," and Aurelius wanted Maximus to take his place as emperor. Both Claudius and Commadus wanted power so badly, that they killed in order to get what they wanted.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These stories are both similar in treachery because the men that they had trusted and confided in had murdered them. Claudius betrayed his brother by poisoning him then marrying his wife; Commadus betrayed his father by suffocating him after learning Aurelius did not want his only son to rule.
Another example of the similarities between these two stories is that Hamlet and Maximus both had to change themselves in order to seek their vengeance. They both went from being looked highly upon in society, to being looked down on. Hamlet fooled people by acting like he was crazy. This way his stepfather could not suspect Hamlet of knowing that he had murdered Hamlet's father.
Following the death of Emperor Marcus Aurelius, Maximus finds himself an enemy of the new Emperor Commadus. He is reduced to the status of a slave and eventually falls into the hands of a gladiator trainer. He then begins to forge a new life for himself as a ruthless killing machine that entertains the fickle crowd, as the behind-the-scenes politics of second century Rome stand to make him a hero of the people.
By fighting as a gladiator he seek revenge on the new Emperor of Rome.
Hamlet and Maximus want to avenge those who have been killed so badly that they undergo obstacles with courage and their heads high as well as they both risking their lives for what they believe in.
Throughout Hamlet, one might also notice they have taken similar ideas from "Hamlet" and used them to help make their story a (better one). Towards the beginning of the story before Aurelius is killed, Commadus tells the senators that "they'll be pouring honey potion in people's ears..." in order to make the country republic. What is similar is that Claudius poured "potion" into King Hamlet's ear, in order to kill him.
Another moment in Gladiator that makes you think of Hamlet is towards the end when Commodus tells his nephew, Lucius, about their ancestor Emperor Claudius. He tells Lucius that "[Claudius] was betrayed! By those closest to him..." This is similar to Hamlet because Gertrude betrays Claudius and Lucilla betrays Commodus. This is ironic because both Claudius and Commodus betrayed loved ones in order to gain power.
Along with these similarities there are also many differences. For instance Hamlet was born a prince while Maximus was the general for Aurelius's army. Also King Hamlet was killed by his brother and Aurelius was killed by his son, and Hamlet's mother dies in the end while Commadus' sister survives. The main difference, however, is in the end of these stories.
In Hamlet, he never lets on to Claudius that he knows how his father died. Instead he acts as if he is crazy. It is not until a theatrical group re-enacts how King Hamlet was murdered that Claudius realises that Hamlet knows.........................
In Gladiator, as soon as Maximus sees Commadus in the Coliseum he tells Commadus that he will kill him for the murders he has committed. In the end Maximus kills Commadus while all of Rome watches this form of "entertainment" take place. Maximus, badly wounded dies soon after giving the Empire to the senators to become republic.
Even though these two stories have their differences, they are both dramatic tragedies. The emotion that a tragic character portrays helps us to relate and become more entranced with the story. Up until the heroes have died they have got to know that person. They have understood the character, their motivations, and reactions. When they die, they have died courageously for what they have believed in.
In life we are always looking for an "idol" hero-worshipping. Our fascination for dramatic tragedy has survived throughout the years because man in his inadequate ways needs to have someone whom they can look up to, so to speak.
Lets face it we are often intrigued by human suffering especially if it is for noble causes.
People often carry the same beliefs as these leaders, and fully support them. These heroes are the epitome of what we believe in, willing to die for causes. We love to believe that someone is willing to go to that extent for our beliefs. Their deaths often accomplish what could not be done while they were alive. This is illustrated when Maximus says "what we do in life, echoes in eternity."
The similarities and differences in Hamlet and Gladiator are what help make dramatic tragedies survive through the ages. However, it is not only in movies or plays, it is also in real life. These heroes have died for what they believed in and have made a difference in our lives. It gives us strength to face the world we live in today, and it gives us understanding as to why these leaders are fighting. This is why dramatic tragedies have survived throughout the ages, and this is why they will continue to survive for years to come.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
When the ghost of king hamlet and young are alone, the ghost speaks. It claims to be the spirit of king hamlet, murdered by Claudius. Though the story is that king hamlet was napping in his garden and was stung by a serpent, in reality Claudius poured poison into the sleeping kings ear, murdering the king and sending him to purgatory since he was not given a opportunity to confess his sins before his death. This scene of deceit also correlated to and biblical story of adam and eve where the serpent enter the garden and corrupts them both. The ghost reveals truth. Also note that the way claudius murdered king hamlet, by pouring poison into king hamlet's ear, is actually a perfect metaphor for lying, for using language to hide reality. Poison is illustration of metaphors that Shakespeare commonly uses. It is mentioned a numerous amounts of times in referring to Claudius but it is also used when referring to Denmark's state, "Who this had seen, with tongue in venom steeped against Fortune's state would treason have pronounced”.…
- 253 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Hamlets father was killed by his Uncle Claudius due to jealousy of the kingdom. Claudius poisoned his brother while he was sleeping in the garden. Hamlet finds out his father was murdered by meeting is ghost in the yard of the kingdom. Hamlet decides to plan out his revenge by first acting like he has gone mad because of his father’s death. He breaks his loves heart in the process but doesn’t stop his revenge. He orders for a play to be presented to the royal court, including his uncle and his mother. This play is supposed to simulate his fathers death and he wants to see how the king reacts to the play. This is where he realizes that the ghost was telling the truth. Claudius then figures out that Hamlet has been suspicious and decides to send him to England to be killed. While speaking to his mother, Hamlet hears someone spying on them and kills his loves father, Polonius. This was the beginning of the tragedy. Hamlet has a moment to kill Claudius before he leaves for England but questions himself and his actions. He then leaves only to return after finding a letter of his execution and being “attacked” by pirates. Claudius and Polonius’s son, Laertes, have come up with a plan to kill Hamlet when he arrives. They are going to challenge him in a fencing battle with poison at the end of the sword. If this plan fails, they will have poisoned wine for Hamlet to drink.…
- 781 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The appearance of his father's ghost didn't seem very reliable to him as he began to question his own sanity over what he thinks he should do about the situation. Hamlet deeply contemplates about his soul being damned on actions he was willing to pursue in avenging his father's death. He cautiously plots his act of revenge and waits for the ideal moment to avenge his father's murder. He decides to show King Claudius a play, a similar performance of Claudius' own murderous deed, hopefully seeing some kind of reaction from the king. He says "I'll have these…
- 1027 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In Act I scene V, the ghost of King Hamlet intends to ensnare Hamlet because it seeks revenge against Claudius for killing him. The ghost of King Hamlet announced to Hamlet that he did not die from a snake bite but instead was killed by Claudius during the time of sleep. With Hamlet being desperate to communicate with his father, he is attentively listening to every word that the ghost of King Hamlet gives to him. The ghost of King Hamlet knows that Hamlet loves his father very much therefore he takes advantage of him by announcing that he must “Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder” (I.V. 31). The ghost of King Hamlet is trying to entrap Hamlet into murdering Claudius by reassuring him that the deed or killing Claudius must be done…
- 309 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Like many tragedies, Shakespeare’s Hamlet does not fail to provide readers with tales of fervent, bloody revenge which satisfies the primal impulses of characters in the play, wrought on by unjust murder and a desire for vengeance. With a temperamental demeanor and mercurial mood, Laertes is portrayed in many instances as a brash, near irrational son whose desire to avenge his father’s death leads to both verbal and physical conflict. Even Hamlet himself enjoys his own moments of frustration, slandering his duplicitous and incestuous uncle in private scenes and soliloquies. Unlike many traditional revenge tales, however, Hamlet also illuminates the question of the morality of revenge itself: whether or not the adage of “an eye for an eye” may…
- 1081 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout the tragedy of Hamlet, Shakespeare writes about Hamlet’s journey of seeking revenge. The play begins with Marcellus and Barnardo taking watch over the Denmark castle one night and running into a ghost in the shape of King Hamlet who recently passed. Along with these two men enters Francisco and Horatio, Hamlet’s friends, who also witness the appearance of the ghost and decide to inform Hamlet of what they have seen. After explaining to Hamlet what they have seen they advise him to see for himself at midnight upon their next watch, and sure enough the ghost reappears. As Hamlet follows the ghost it describes the actions that led to his death, explaining that Claudius murdered him, then asks Hamlet to avenge him. In the midst of asking Hamlet to punish Claudius he also says, “Taint not thy mind, not let thy soul contrive/Against thy mother aught. Leave her to Heaven/And to those thorns that in her bosom lodge/…
- 503 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the ghost of Hamlet’s father reveals to him that he has been murdered by his brother Claudius, the man who also married Hamlet’s mother after he died. After finding out that Claudius killed his father, Hamlet makes it his mission to avenge his father by killing Claudius. Many believe that Hamlet went mad after seeing the ghost and planning his revenge, but really it was just part of the process that came with his revenge on Claudius.…
- 971 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Hamlet was known as the madman of the book. After the death of his father and his mother marrying his uncle that killed king Hamlet., the ghost (of old hamlet) says “,The serpent that did sting Hamlet’s father’s life/Now wears his crown.” The ghost also goes onto to say “that that in lestuous, that adulterate beast,/ with traitorous gifts won to his shameful lust / the will of old hamlet's most seeming virtuous…
- 660 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The responsibility of revenge on the perpetrator falls to Hamlet, since he believes his father was murdered. Hamlet learned the events that unfolded during his father’s murder in the garden from a ghost that claimed to be the spirit of King Hamlet. In both soliloquies, his desire and drive to kill Claudius is “prompted to [his] revenge by heaven and hell” (2.2.547). His thoughts of revenge derive from seeing his father’s thought to be spirit in purgatory. The ghost that visited Hamlet may be the “devil” that “assume[d] a pleasing shape” (2.2.561-562) by making himself appear as the spirit of his father tempting him to sin, or could indeed be his father wanting him to redeem his soul. Even though Hamlet is not certain he believes the ghost since it answered his suspicion in the death of his father and the quick marriage of…
- 512 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Tragically, the state of Denmark is lead falsely to believe that a poisonous snake was the cause of his death. In reality, the king’s death was a murder committed by his brother-and-current-king, Claudius. During the course of the play, Claudius claims in his soliloquy, “I am still possessed / Of those effects for which I did the murder: / My crown, mine own ambition, and my queen. May one be pardoned and retain th’ offense?” (III, iii, 57-60). He recognizes his fault through repentance, but his ambition undermines his ability to abandon the throne. Being the king’s brother, Claudius’s coronation is a natural duty. It opposes the grief and relieves the mourning of the people of Denmark. In actuality, his ambition for power causes him to betray his loyalty towards his brother. Even though he deceives his subjects by compelling them to place their trust in his kingship, his duplicity does not go unseen for long. The first person to see through his deceit is prince Hamlet, when an apparition of the king Hamlet, prince Hamlet’s father, tells him, “Tis given out that, sleeping in my orchard, / A serpent stung me. So the whole ear of Denmark / Is by a forged process of my death / Rankly abused. But know, thou noble youth, / The serpent that did sting thy father’s life / Now wears his crown” (I, v, 42-47). The appearance of the ghost itself shows the unnatural nature of Claudius’s murder and symbolizes…
- 809 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In using the conventions of the revenge tragedy genre, expectations are created for an audience who understand the conflict that looms under Claudius’s leadership unless Hamlet revenges his father’s ‘most foul and unnatural murder’. Yet Hamlet is conflicted over the moral dilemma that confronts him, expressing this through his Judeo Christian perspective of ‘O cursed spite that ever I was born to set it right’. His powerful use of soliloquy throughout the play explores the paradigm shift between Renaissance and Judeo-Christian ideas on life and life after death. ‘To be or not to be...’ asks Hamlet, reflecting the philosophical existential concerns of this context and supporting the plays longevity for these paramount concerns remain relevant to every context. Here Shakespeare has successfully mirrored the ferment and change in his society, whilst modern directors mirror theirs in ways that reflect their values and beliefs. It is for this reason that Shakespeare’s work is described as ‘not of an age, but for all time’ (Ben Johnson).…
- 948 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
When it comes to the art of tragedy, many philosophers have tried to define what makes something perfectly tragic. One such person is the well-renowned Greek philosopher Aristotle who felt that every successful Tragedy has six main parts: Plot, Characters, Diction, Thought, Spectacle, and Melody. Although Aristotle points out that Character and Spectacle can occasionally be left out, these six parts are the fundamentals to a good tragedy that he focuses on. While reflecting on these six pieces of a tragedy and pondering how they could be related to any movies in our era and one stuck out above the rest; Gladiator. The movie Gladiator, which debuted in the year 2000, follows the fall and rise of General Maximus as he is thrown into chains after being betrayed by the new emperor Commodus. Despite the fact that this movie chronicles fictional events of the Roman Empire, there are numerous aspects of this movie that parallel Aristotle’s view of what makes a good Greek Tragedy.…
- 820 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the beginning of the play when Hamlet first comes to learn that his uncle and now step-father Claudius murdered his father, King Hamlet, Hamlet begins to slowly lose his mental stability and his state of mind is questioned. Throughout the play Hamlet puts on an act of madness in hopes that the people in the play will feel freely to take about him and he may gain a confession or some evidence that King Claudius murdered King Hamlet. The already depressed Hamlet starts to spiral into an uncontrollable downfall that later result in thoughts of suicide. Hamlets character is however, a very smart young man and he is able to think things through before making a rash decision of life or death. In the beginning of the play when Hamlet comes to the realization of his father's death he feels that it has become his duty to kill his uncle in order to avenge the death of his father. Hamlet learns from what is believed to be the ghost of his deceased father that Claudius killed him while he was asleep and Hamlet becomes bombarded with the want of revenge and is overcome with pure hate. (Shakespeare I. v 39-40). Ghost "The serpent that did sting thy father's life/Now wears his crown." Hamlet "O my prophetic soul! My uncle?" He realizes that he must wait and get any evidence out of his uncle Claudius in order to show his Mother, the Royal Court and the people of Denmark that it was Claudius who murdered Old Hamlet and that he did not simply die mysteriously from a random snake bite…
- 1092 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The main grievance Hamlet has with his uncle is the murder of his father, the king. Already grieving over death of his father, Hamlet discovers, by confession of his father, that Claudius murder him in order to become king. Called to action by his friend Horatio and the guards who have witness appearances of a ghost during their night watch, Hamlet goes to confront the ghost that looks like the late King Hamlet. A ghost doomed to walk the earth for an unspecified number of years to atone for the sins that he was not able to confess, King Hamlet Sr., tells the prince that he was murdered by Claudius through foul means. He states, “Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder. Murder most foul, as in the best it is; But this most foul, strange and unnatural” (249), demanding that Hamlet, his son, avenge his ill-conceived death. Overcome with grief and anger at the injustice done to him (as Claudius has managed to steal the crown from him) and his father, Hamlet begins to plot his vengeance. However, being the only one who has talked to ghost, Hamlet, wanting to ensure that…
- 1079 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Hamlet’s inner conflict is a major driving force in the play despite the fact that his personal struggle with morality is the thing that holds him back and causes his delay in taking action against Claudius. Hamlet is torn between what is right and wrong, and what is real and fake. On the one hand, he has a duty to avenge his father’s murder which means killing King Claudius, however, because of the power of the monarch and the divine right of kings, Hamlet faces a not only an act against the monarch but also against God whilst living under the religious pressures of the 16th century where people believed that monarchs were God’s deputies on Earth and had a ‘divine right’ to rule. The idea that there were some rightful and God-chosen claimants — such as James I, who certainly believed strongly in the Divine Right of Kings and himself as evidence of it — and others who were not, was a very relevant issue for Shakespeare's audience.…
- 1363 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays