Preview

han and roman empire

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
358 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
han and roman empire
The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty were considered the two most powerful empires that ruled their respective parts of the world in the Ancient Era. The Roman Empire dominated the Mediterranean Basin and the Han Dynasty east and central Asia. The Roman
Empire shares a combination of internal and external problems subsidizing the fall in the western portion. The Roman Empire parallels the Han Dynasty in the internal pressures each empire has faced and the epidemic effect on trade routes and economic dealings; however, the decline of each empire differed in the sense that one suffered from foreign invasions and the other had weak leaders who could not maintain control.
The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty share comparisons in the result of the collapse of the empires. The Silk Road was offered as a trade way to exchange biological materials such as cherries, apricots, peaches, and walnuts from Central Asia and China to the
Mediterranean. Along with the material products, fruits, and nuts that traveled, infectious diseases caused ferocious epidemics when they found their way to the unexposed populations.
The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire suffered from the diseases including smallpox, measles, and the bubonic plague that decreased the majority of the people. The epidemic disease weakened the Chinese and the Roman societies, which negatively affected economic and social change. The Roman Empire equaled in internal and external forces, whereas the Han Dynasty’s political struggles, within the empire, was significant due to its weakening. During the 235 C.E to 284 C.E, there were 26, mostly generals, who seized power of the empire, yet controlled it briefly. The central problem of the Roman Empire was due to its large size resulting it to become unmanageable. Emperor Diocletian attempted to deal with the problems by dividing the empire into two segregated districts. After his retirement, a round of struggles, including civil wars occurred.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han China and Imperial Rome had some Similarities. Both Han China and Imperial Rome had very large empires that it was difficult to manage their boarders and often faced threats. Both Empires were patriarchal societies and kept women in low status with no say in political affairs. Both Han China and Imperial Rome were ruled by one centralized ruler. Both empires had standardized coins to promote…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han Dynasty and The Western Roman Empire are two of the greatest empires that have ever lived but that all comes to an end when disasters start occurring left and right. However, the methods of achieving greatness varied immensely their actions had helped them in the long run but soon failed miserably.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major similarity between the administration policies of Han China and Imperial Rome was that both empires had very centralized governments. In China, the emperor had all the power. While there were smaller units of government, the emperor controlled everything within the empire. Han China’s government structure was modeled after its precursor, the Qin dynasty. The Han elaborated on the original structure, perfecting it. In Rome, the emperor was also the most powerful; however the Roman people had an illusion of power not seen in Han China. Although the emperor held the…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China are both well recognized empires, known as strong and fairly successful. Although the empires had some differences they also had similarities in their methods of political control. Similarities between these empires include the belief that leaders had connections to God, religious tolerance, and public works provided to citizens. Along with the similarities in political control the differences include Rome having a democracy while China had a centralized bureaucracy, Rome had lesser domestic repercussions while China had harsh punishments, and Rome offered assimilation to become a citizen while China did not need to offer assimilation because it conquered states that were already chinese.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collapse of Rome and Han

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The collapse of Han and Rome empires were also very different and unique from each other. The Roman empire fell because of Civil Wars, and plagues throughout the country. After trying to buy loyalty from the army Rome became bankrupt. The Roman empire had gotten so big that it was difficult to defend against all foreign forces. These all contributed to the fall of Rome. The Han mainly fell because it was incredibly difficult to defend against invaders along the extremely long border. The small food supply, and internal power struggles also added to the collapse of the Han empire.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han dynasty and Roman Empire demonstrated many different attitudes and reaction as new technological advancements emerged and diffused thought the empire. The romans sought out that tradition was necessary to incorporate and implement into their works, which involved much more workload. On the other hand the Han accepted of most new advancements, as it benefited and contributed toward their social and economic status, that develop rapidly…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analyze similarities and differences in methods of political control in the following empires in the classical period.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major and most common similarity the Han and Roman empires share is they were both very successful and dominant compared to other societies of their time. One reason these two empires were so dominant is because of their advancement in architecture. During the Han Dynasty much of the Great Wall of China was built. Although the Han Dynasty was much more advanced in architecture than other societies they could not compare to Roman architecture, no one really could. The Romans are known for many things but one of the most commonly talked about subjects when it comes to Rome is architecture. The Romans are given credit for creating cement, which leads to all their other architecture achievements, like the Arch of Titus, The Arch of Constantine, and one of the most famous Roman Buildings the Roman Colosseum. The Roman and Han dynasty were also similar in the matter of what their weapons were made of. The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire both used bronze and iron for things like swords, and shields. These two powerful empires share another thing in common, roads and trades routes. Some of these trade routes were by sea, the Mediterranean and Black Seas were a huge part of Roman trading. The most useful trade route during this time was the Silk Road. Various items were traded on the Silk Road such as silk, weapons, tea, wine, horses, jewelry, and other valuables. Architecture, the use of bronze and iron, and their many…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Vs Han

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty are some of the earliest empires that existed. They both lasted around four hundred years (Roman Empire lasted from around 37 B.C.- 476 A.D. and the Han Dynasty lasted from around 206 B.C.-220 A.D.). During this time these civilizations were the most powerful in the world. At their height, these empires had populations of around fifty million people, and they both covered approximately two million square miles. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty both sought to protect their trade routes (the Roman Empire had the Mediterranean and the Han Dynasty had the Silk Road). They protected their trade routes by expanding their empires into these territories. Both empires had economies based off of agriculture, so for them the more land they owned the wealthier the empire was. These empires also developed an infrastructure to make communication, access to resources, and movement of military much easier. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty both involved in economic activities that were designed to ensure a stable social and political order, and they used bureaucracy and taxation to provision major cities. Both were patriarchal societies where the father of the family had the most power.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, they both began to grow rapidly and out of control towards the end of their times because they could not support all of the people that were moving inside their walls. This must have been a hard time for them because they were doing to well until the time that because they were growing so rapidly they could not support all of their newfound citizens. Another similarity economically is that they both traded with other societies and because of this many things were passed on such as plagues. One of the reasons they both fell was because of plagues, the Romans had the Black plague while the Han had the Antonine plague. The last reason that they both fell was how they handled agriculture. On one hand the Han always had the promise of new land to peasants is they served in the war but after a while they started to run out of land that they would do and that made people very upset. These examples of defeat are helpful for us to know because enow we can use them and realize that with all of our new ideas and technology we don’t have to make the same mistakes that many ancient societies did that eventually lead to their…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han and Rome

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages

    While the Roman and the Han empires were similar, they also differed. The households within both empires were run very differently. In the Roman households, they enforced a concept of pater familias, meaning the eldest male in the house would rule, this is also passed down through generations. Where as in the Han, they followed a Confucian quality,…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Empires on their outside may seem very different and unique. However, when you get down to their fundamentals, you begin to truly realize how similar they are. Just as the imposing pine tree and humble tomato plant may seem vastly different, their start from a lowly seed and craving for water and sunlight to survive unifies them. Such is also true with the Han and Roman empires. While key differences may be present, their social structures, influencing religions, and causes of collapse unify them.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Silk Road Research Paper

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    People were exposed to diseases they didn’t know about, and they didn’t have any treatment for it or immunity to it. One place involved with it was Greek city-state of Athens, which was affected by new and unidentified diseases, it killed about 25% of its army and weakened the city-state for good. The widespread diseases also affected the Han Dynasty China and the Roman Empire, but contacted on the Silk Roads all across Eurasia was basically promoted. Sporadic outburst of the bubonic plague ruined the coastal areas of the Mediterranean Sea as the black rats that held the plague came through the sea trade with India, where they came from. The capital of the city of the Byzantine Empire, lost thousands of people per day throughout 40 days. The same death count troubled China and parts of the Islamic world. In the Central Asian steppes that were home to a lot of nomadic people involving the Mongols, who also struggled horribly. In the prolonged shoot of world history, the transfer of disease gave Europeans a specific benefit when they stood up to the people of the Western Hemisphere. Revealing over time had given them some level of resistance to Europeans and Africans from over the Atlantic, they died in shocking…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Time has the ability to change many things, but many also stay the same. This holds true for the interactions along the Silk Road from 200 B.C.E to 1450 C.E. Although the similarities may outweigh the changes, the silk road diffused disease along with culture, adapted to overseas trade, helped to forge a connection between Asian and European markets and triggered periods of Enlightenment in Europe.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays