Preview

Han Dynasty Causes

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
571 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Han Dynasty Causes
The Han Empire was one of the strongest classical empires. It prevailed long before many others have fallen. The Han has achieved many things but for many reasons did not last. “all great things must come to an end”, and for the Han being such a great empire its reasons were lack of leadership, rebellions or civil wars, unstable religion, and being unable to protect themselves from outsiders.
It started when emperors Zhao, Xuan, and Yuan started to lose their powers in state affairs. [travelchinaguide.com]Going against choosing those on their abilities and instead on astronomy and fortune telling. The western Han went into a revolution and Wang Mang took the throne.[Wikipedia.org] Wang was later overthrown by peasants, and then a new emperor named Liu Xiu was put on the throne. Emperors of the Han dynasty where inconsistent and were constantly changing the ways and methods of the empire and the people. They were constantly being over thrown or dethroned and put on the throne. This made it hard for the people to trust and believe in their leaders and for leaders to rule and guide there people. Many times this would lead to the outcome of a revolution.
The people of the Han were getting sucked into tax loads, diseases, and floods. A
…show more content…
Han would supply the Nomads with goods, supplies, and princess in exchange for protection from other tribes. The Han dynasty soon began to run out of resources and the nomads began to raid the Han cities. Now the Han not only had to fend off the barbarians but also the nomads. Because of the outsiders attacking china wanted to create the great walls, which lead to the rapid increase in taxes causing the peasants to rebel. The barbarians and Han fought and ended up having the many casualties on both sides, but the barbarians had little to lose while the Han was left to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman and Han Empires were the most powerful empires among the Classical Empires. Between the fifth century B.C.E. and the fifth century C.E., the Roman empire of the Mediterranean and the Han Empire of China were both influential powers of the Classical Asian and Mediterranean worlds. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were similar in their falls because they both fell to nomadic invaders, and because they both fell because of a decline in economic trade. The Han and the Roman Empires were different in their falls because the Han suffered from serious revolts whereas the Romans did not; also the effects of their falls were different because China was able to make a fairly quick comeback whereas Rome was never able to do so.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will compare similarities and the differences of the Roman and Han Dynasty empires. It will compare their creation, maintenance, culture, and decline.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China and Rome were two of the most powerful and popular empires of their time, but they fell like any other empire before them. Han China and Rome’s Empires had the same causes for their declines, but their effects are different.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman and Han empires were both very powerful, in their own rights. Although their culture and beliefs were very different, their ideology and governments were, at points, very similar. Both empires experienced a rise, plateau, and fall, which eventually changed their entire empires.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han dynasty was the most influential dynasty in Chinese history and led to china becoming a country as we know it today. They extended Chinese rule from southern Mongolia to northern Vietnam and as far west as Nepal. One of the main reason for the prosperity and solidity of the Han dynasty was the relationship between the imperial family and the elite. Each group supported each other economically as well as socially, leading to a stable and prosperous empire.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time 1000-1400, Europe was under a feudalist system and had no centralized government. Lords were fighting other lords to gain wealth and power. Government was largely influenced by Christianity and non-Christians were being persecuted throughout Europe, which led to a decline in manpower and unity. On the other hand, China centralized government, its prospering trades, and the empire's wealth strengthened the political stability of the empire. The vast empire had one leader, there were little internal conflicts, and the empire had a strong enough defense to defend themselves from invaders. Under a strong government, the empire was protected, trade flourished, and the China's wealth grew. While China was flourishing, Europe was falling apart. The region was politically unstable; religion caused a lot of deaths, adding to that, the Black Death arrived in Europe which further weakened the…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason that the Roman Empire and the Han were so powerful is because both had strong central governments. While they were able to do this, each had varying methods of…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire covered a lot of territory in Eurasia. From the year 1000B.C.E. (when the first settlement on the site of Rome occurred) to 600C.E. (just after the fall of both empires) the technological advances made were astonishing. Maps, pictures, and written documents are able to portray the details of what life was like in both of these large empires. All three of these will be used to explain how more technological inventions allowed these two empires to expand their control over the land. Although the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were both large and powerful, it was mainly due to their technological advances.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rome and han

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    rome and hans political administration and cultural challenges was very intersting. While rome and han created cultural and administrative difficulties that led to their downfall of there empires they still left a big mark on how to become a succersor empire. Rome and Han empires were very different on there administrative views. The romans chose there leader and all the people were taxed equally and more interregional interactive, they were kind of like a democracy, unlike han where everything was based on the social system. The han dynasty power was passed down the family so you basically had to be born into the elite class, they were also taxed on class and very divided this upset some people and later on lead to the yellow turban rebellion and was one reason for the downfall. the reason they were like this was because the empores had varying justification for living. Since both empires were so large the voume of long distance trade increased dramatically. They traded luxury goods, food, crops, technology, cultural beliefs, and also disease pathogens. The diseases were a huge part of the collapse of both empires because so many people were dying and the people that werent dying were angry. The empires wanted to intergrate rapidly but they did not think there would be this much chaos. They were similar in many ways though. Both empires had very popular leaders. For rome they had constantine who endorsed chrisitnaity and wanted to make peace with the other religions in rome, he also funded buildings and built churches. For the Han Empire their leader was Bhuda who also legalized buddhism and founded buildings, built monastraires, roads and rest stops. Both the leaders wanted unity and peace and they also gained popularity which led to all there followers and there…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wealthy noble families began to gain extreme power as foolish and corrupt emperors led to a decrease in the government’s power. Wang Mang, a reformist official, took the Han court’s power and attempted to establish the Xin dynasty. However, he was killed before he could actually carry out the reforms he had planned. After his death, a strong leadership was established for some time. During this time, the court tried to redistribute land to the free farmers who had been forced to become tenants; and they also tried to decrease land taxes. Also, food production increased. But unease among the peasants continued due to weak and corrupt rules and the wealthy’s power over the land. Nomadic raids by the Xiongnu…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While both empires had many great rulers who paved the way for greatness there were some people in power that, because of there greediness, caused the downfall of their empire. The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty both fell because of their corrupt leaders.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    China And Rome Dbq Essay

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire both expanded their boundaries to the point where many thought they would be impossible to defeat. Regardless of that power, both empires had very devastating falls. Though they were both very different societies, China having a centralized bureaucracy, and Rome having a rule based on laws and private authorities, like many empires, many aspects of their defeat are similar. Some of the ideas contributing to this fall was the stress on military, the high taxes placed on citizens, and the religions of each empire.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two of the most significant empires of the classical period were the Rome empire and the Han dynasty. Both of these nations developed a well built Bureaucracy, emphasis on family, and boasted the invention of many technological advances. These two powerhouses still affect our everyday lives. However, all good things must come to an end.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The factors that contributed to the demise of the Roman empire and the Han empire have elements that are the same. The Roman government became less effective due to struggles over who was going to be in power. Twenty-six barrack emperors came and fell from power in a short period of time. Each of these emperors was violently displaced by the general who wanted to be the emperor of Rome next. This is no way to keep government control stable. The constant power struggle led to the government officials being more focused on how to become the next emperor then how to run the…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays