Preview

Han Dynasty Compare Contrast Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
427 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Han Dynasty Compare Contrast Essay
The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty were two of the most powerful civilizations to rule over their empires. Both the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire had tremendous amounts of accomplishments, they both ended in total destruction, but they both differed in how they achieved there power, the Han Dynasty gained their power through Legalism, and the Roman Empire became successful using a republic government.

The accomplishments of the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire are both astounding. Augustus, the first emperor of the Roman empire, had ended hundreds of years of civil war, he increased nd increased trade and commerce. After time passed another line of power started by Vespasian was recognized as the golden age of the Roman Empire.
…show more content…

The Han
Dynasty eventually opened a famous road known as the Silk Road. Overall, the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were very successful civilizations.

Even though the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty were both very successful, you can only have so much luck, and it only lasts so long. For the Roman Empire, the beginning of the end was when the emperor Commodus had violent practices, and didnt respect the leaders. He was later assassinated.
The Romans began to lose power, were submerged in debt when they tried to buy the loyalty of the army, and it was a downward spiral in all areas. The Han dynasty, considered by scholars had ended due to the loss of the mandate of heaven, because the people of the Han Dynasty believed in Confucianism, everything turned to chaos, when the emperor wasnt in touch with the gods.
The Roman empire and the Han dynasty were both very successful and powerful civilizations but ended due to weak leaders, and the want of too much power.

Though the Roman Empire and the Han dynasty are very alike, the main difference was the way in which they came to power, and their governments. The Han Dynasty gained their power through


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han China and Imperial Rome had some Similarities. Both Han China and Imperial Rome had very large empires that it was difficult to manage their boarders and often faced threats. Both Empires were patriarchal societies and kept women in low status with no say in political affairs. Both Han China and Imperial Rome were ruled by one centralized ruler. Both empires had standardized coins to promote…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome and Han China shared similar techniques in their methods of military conquest in relation to their imperial administration. Both Rome and Han China established control of their territory though fighting and defending land. Testaments of this can be seen when Rome used legions that consisted of heavy infantry. Each legion had thousands of soldiers and was sent to the battlefield head first to fight. These legions were considered standing units and a professional army that were sent out wherever war came about. Rome also had numerous soldiers along all the borders as a means of defense. Similarly, Han China also had regiments consisting of thousands of soldiers that were sent out for military conquest. These regiments correspondingly were considered as well, professional armies known as standing units. Han China in the same way had an abundant number of soldiers along their borders even with the defense added on by the Great Wall of China. These similarities were key as each empire brought the provinces of their domains together though military conquest into regimes of unprecedented scale and thereby enhanced the integration of local worlds into a common legal and cultural framework. Rome conquered the Mediterranean using legions and forcing other regions and new lands to join them. Correspondingly they defended by putting out soldiers on all the borders in case of any attackers. In comparison, Han China conquered East Asia by taking over territories and using their regiments of thousands of soldiers to make the people join the empire as well. Using similar actions, Han China also followed by defending their borders through stationed soldiers and by even expanding the Great Wall of China to…

    • 756 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman and Han Empires were the most powerful empires among the Classical Empires. Between the fifth century B.C.E. and the fifth century C.E., the Roman empire of the Mediterranean and the Han Empire of China were both influential powers of the Classical Asian and Mediterranean worlds. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were similar in their falls because they both fell to nomadic invaders, and because they both fell because of a decline in economic trade. The Han and the Roman Empires were different in their falls because the Han suffered from serious revolts whereas the Romans did not; also the effects of their falls were different because China was able to make a fairly quick comeback whereas Rome was never able to do so.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han Dynasty and The Western Roman Empire are two of the greatest empires that have ever lived but that all comes to an end when disasters start occurring left and right. However, the methods of achieving greatness varied immensely their actions had helped them in the long run but soon failed miserably.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han and Rome Comparison

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Han and Rome were two great empires that had similarities and differences. Han and Rome at a similar decline because of the lack of a stable economy. The different political systems caused Han and Rome to rise differently.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    - The Han ruled through emperors, while the Greek city-states ruled either by monarchy, oligarchy, or a democracy and the Romans had a republic.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major and most common similarity the Han and Roman empires share is they were both very successful and dominant compared to other societies of their time. One reason these two empires were so dominant is because of their advancement in architecture. During the Han Dynasty much of the Great Wall of China was built. Although the Han Dynasty was much more advanced in architecture than other societies they could not compare to Roman architecture, no one really could. The Romans are known for many things but one of the most commonly talked about subjects when it comes to Rome is architecture. The Romans are given credit for creating cement, which leads to all their other architecture achievements, like the Arch of Titus, The Arch of Constantine, and one of the most famous Roman Buildings the Roman Colosseum. The Roman and Han dynasty were also similar in the matter of what their weapons were made of. The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire both used bronze and iron for things like swords, and shields. These two powerful empires share another thing in common, roads and trades routes. Some of these trade routes were by sea, the Mediterranean and Black Seas were a huge part of Roman trading. The most useful trade route during this time was the Silk Road. Various items were traded on the Silk Road such as silk, weapons, tea, wine, horses, jewelry, and other valuables. Architecture, the use of bronze and iron, and their many…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Rome and Han experienced great times of prosperity. However, both regions also suffered political instability due to unequal land distribution, which led to their demise. Both Rome and Han developed monarchies with aristocrats as aides to the emperors. In these systems the wealthy controlled a majority of the land, thus causing…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han dynasty was the most influential dynasty in Chinese history and led to china becoming a country as we know it today. They extended Chinese rule from southern Mongolia to northern Vietnam and as far west as Nepal. One of the main reason for the prosperity and solidity of the Han dynasty was the relationship between the imperial family and the elite. Each group supported each other economically as well as socially, leading to a stable and prosperous empire.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Han China and Imperial Rome had a political system structure consisting of a sovereign emperor who made executive, almost dictator-like, decisions and directed the affairs of the empire. However, in both empires, emperors relied on regional governors to regulated affairs in their respective regions due to the fact that both empires were so massive and consisted of an enormous population.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Vs Han

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a lot in common, but they also have many differences. For instance, the Roman Empire relied heavily on slave (mostly prisoners of war) labor, but the Han Dynasty relied greatly on free peasant labor. Although both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a well organized bureaucracy, the Han Dynasty had bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideology. Also the Han Dynasty did not have paved roads, where as the Roman Empire constructed many paved roads (which was because the romans discovered concrete).…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, they both began to grow rapidly and out of control towards the end of their times because they could not support all of the people that were moving inside their walls. This must have been a hard time for them because they were doing to well until the time that because they were growing so rapidly they could not support all of their newfound citizens. Another similarity economically is that they both traded with other societies and because of this many things were passed on such as plagues. One of the reasons they both fell was because of plagues, the Romans had the Black plague while the Han had the Antonine plague. The last reason that they both fell was how they handled agriculture. On one hand the Han always had the promise of new land to peasants is they served in the war but after a while they started to run out of land that they would do and that made people very upset. These examples of defeat are helpful for us to know because enow we can use them and realize that with all of our new ideas and technology we don’t have to make the same mistakes that many ancient societies did that eventually lead to their…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Qin Dynasty, the reason for the fall was systematic problems, contests for power, fear, and disloyalty. Each resulted from one another. Systematic problems caused uproar, and a contest for power among officials. The contest for power caused fear and disloyalty amongst the citizens, who didn’t know what else to do. This fall does not exactly line up with the Conrad Demarest Model of Empires. The fall of the Han Dynasty did match up exactly with the Model of Empires though. In the fall of the Han Dynasty, there were many revolutions. The main revolution, which in the end cause the fall of the weakening empire, was the revolution of the peasants. In the weakened state of the Han Dynasty towards the end, the peasants were being taken advantage of, and were fed up with not getting a fair share of the wealth in the…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han Dynasty Causes

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Han Empire was one of the strongest classical empires. It prevailed long before many others have fallen. The Han has achieved many things but for many reasons did not last. “all great things must come to an end”, and for the Han being such a great empire its reasons were lack of leadership, rebellions or civil wars, unstable religion, and being unable to protect themselves from outsiders.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics