Preview

Hannibal Tactics

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
886 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hannibal Tactics
Hannibal, also known as Hannibal Barca, was a Carthaginian military general often referred to as one of the greatest generals in history and antiquity, together with Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Scipio Africanus, and Pyrrhus of Epirus. He led Carthage through many battles. However his most known was the Second Punic War against Rome. His tactics are still studied and used in the present day. Hannibal was born in 247 BC in Carthage, Tunisia. He was born into a family of military history. His father, Hamilcar Barca, was a Carthaginian leader. After Carthage’s defeat during the first Punic War, Hamilcar moved forth to improve his family’s fortunes. He headed to Spain and invited Hannibal, now just 9 years old, to accompany him. Hannibal …show more content…
By early August, both the Romans and Carthaginians were deployed along the River Aufidus. Hannibal had roughly 40,000 troops and 10,000 cavalry. The Romans, however, had nearly 80,000 troops with 6,000 cavalry. On August 2, the two armies prepared for a battle they would never forget and never expected. The Romans, who were set up in block formation, had plans to break the center of the Carthaginian lines. Hannibal, who expected this type of line-up, had his army designed to use the Romans’ momentum against them. He placed the weak troops, which contained the Gallic Celts and the Spaniards, at the center of the line. His Libyan infantry was near the rear. Hannibal had a strong strategy for this battle and thought the ranks’ positions out thoroughly. Hannibal’s line resembled a crescent with him at the front of the line with the Spaniards and the Gauls. When the trumpets sounded, the battle began. Javelins, spears, shields, swords and other projectiles were among the weapons used for battle. Hannibal’s line was slowly pushed farther and farther back into what eventually formed a concave pocket. However, the Romans did not know it was all part of Hannibal’s plan. He wanted the Romans to believe they were winning so he could lure them into a position they could not successfully get themselves out of. By pushing both flanks forward and breaking through the Roman lines, the Carthaginians were able to circle behind the Roman center and surround the Roman army. Hannibal gave the signal and the Libyans attacked full force, closing the left and right Roman flanks in a vise. By sunset that day, the plain had turned from a dusty field to a bloodbath with 50,000 to 70,000 Roman soldiers dead. Hannibal had only lost 6,000

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Romans confined Acragas with four legions guided by both consuls L.Postumius Megellus and Q. Mamilius Vitulus in 262 BCE, and the Carthaginians endeavored to cover their ally, they were beaten and the city got sacked. The rough handling of Acragas portrayed to the city-states on Sicily what Rome was competent of. Segesta was again loss to Carthage, the city was conlusive to join the Raman cause in 263 BCE. Small level engagements came down without any conclusive result, and Acragas was terminated this second time with 50,000 of its inhabitants suppressed. Although, it was crystal clear that whether Rome wanted to conquer Carthage by 261 BCE, avert continuous support of the enemy by the sea, and govern all of Sicily, they would need a naval workforce fit for the job.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What seemed like what would be an easy Roman victory, turned into utter destruction. The night before the battle, Hannibal Barca, the Commander of the Carthaginians, formulated a plan to destroy the Romans. First, Hannibal would have the center of his army slowly fall back. After that, Hannibal would engage with the Roman flanks. On the day of the battle, the Romans boasted 80,000 ground troops and 6,000 cavalry, while the Carthaginians just had 40,000 infantry and 10,000 cavalry.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Furthermore, they most likely did not have the power or the military force to stop Hannibal had they wanted to do so. Moreover, should they choose to confront Hannibal, they most likely would lose all their economic gains in Spain after the First War. By fighting Rome, they were protecting their interests. A common misconception portrays Hannibal as the sole protagonist against the Romans, but the Carthaginian government also involved themselves in the conflict. Although they did not do as much as Hannibal during the war, the senate still helped in the war. Yet again, the Barcid faction triumphed over the impotent Hannonite…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal became a Carthaginian statesman and eventually grew in power. The Romans were scared that with Hannibal’s increase in power, he would lead another revolt against them. They made Hannibal give up his power and they exiled him. Hannibal traveled to many places including Tyrus, Ephesus, Crete, and Asia Minor. In Ephesus, King Antiochus, was at war with the Romans. Antiochus put Hannibal in control of one if his fleets, but he was defeated. After this, Antiochus was prepared to give Hannibal to the forces of Rome. Hannibal then fled to Crete, after a while, Hannibal was ready to go back to Asia Minor. King Prusias let Hannibal stay with him and Hannibal helped him in the war against Rome’s allies. Hannibal won many victories for Prusias, but the Romans let Hannibal keep helping him. They forced Prusias to hand Hannibal over. Hannibal was not ready to fall into the hands of the Romans. In 183 B.C. Hannibal ingested a deadly poison and…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second Punic war was battle between carthage , Hannibal and Rome. The war saw massive destruction of Roman army in the hands of a great commandant Hannibal. He Hannibal had early Victory over the Rome, which saw destruction of many Romans. This does not deter Romans as they regrouped and raised new armies. Hannibal destroyed several thousands of Roman army, but the Romans were still courageous and ready to defend their Fatherland. At the battle…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another lesson learned is the importance of attacking the enemy’s “strategic center of gravity,” which is typically the political will of the country (Parker). Rome was able to consistently provide support to its military because of the political will. The Carthaginians, however, were defeated immediately following Rome’s attack on its political center in North Africa, following the Battle…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For this reason Carthage declared war on Rome in 218 B.C. and thus started the Second Punic War. The war began when the great Carthaginian general named Hannibal assembled a huge army and crossed the Alps to invade Italy. Hannibal’s army started the war by destroying Rome’s countryside. Hannibal led Carthage into three victories at Ticinus, Trebia and Trasimene. Carthage won an enormous victory at Cannae in 216 B.C. when they surrounded the Roman army. After Rome was defeated in this battle, they vowed to defeat Carthage or die trying. Rome then started to make a comeback in the war by threatening to attack Carthage. Hannibal led his army to defend his city where Carthage and Rome fought the battle of Aama. The Romans were led by the great general Scipio, who led the Roman army to victory, and thus ended the second war. After the war ended, Carthage gave Rome most of their navy and land, causing Rome to become the most powerful force in the…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Punic Wars Analysis

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fabius Maximus was not a traditional Roman strategic leader, as he was known for refusing open battle. Fabius, or the great delayer, appeared to have used systems thinking to deal with Hannibal after the two significant Roman defeats. Fabian’s strategy was to indirectly repress the enemy by disrupting supply lines through skirmishes with Hannibal’s foraging forces, thus weakening the Carthaginian Army. In system terms, the Romans were effectively providing input to a variable on the Carthaginian’s sustainment feedback loop. There was no immediate effect or victor, but ultimately the Roman disruption of supplies, coupled with Hannibal’s inability to receive provisions from Carthage eventually lead to Rome ousting Hannibal from…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal won battles in Trebia, Lake Trasimene and Cannae. “At the battle of Cannae, the Romans lost thousands of soldiers including their leader.” (cite) To gain allied support in the countryside around Cannae, Hannibal terrorized towns in Southern Italy. Hannibal later found himself fighting a new Roman General called Scipio that proved difficult, resulting in his calling for his brother Hasdrubal and his soldiers assistance. Hasdrubal was killed as he was headed to aid Hannibal.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While, Rome is increasing in strength through the conquest of Cisalpine Gaul and the reduction of the Islands in the sea.(Morey,n.d). In the Second Punic War Hannibal of Carthage crossed the Alps and attacked Rome from the North with an assorted army that included an elephant contingent and inflicted defeats on…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scipio studied Hannibal’s tactics and strategized Hannibal would leave Rome and come back to defend his homeland if the Romans could prove a significant threat to the Carthaginian defenses. Scipio’s plan worked. Hannibal was recalled, leaving Italy and relinquishing all the territory he had gained when crossing the Alps. Hannibal met Scipio at Zama about 50 miles outside of Carthage (Mark, 2011).…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carthage did not relent it effort and indicated their interest to control Sicily, which Rome saw as a threat to its existence and influence. The Carthaginian strength lies on it commander general Hannibal who mastered naval military tactics and had taken an oath with his father never to give up to his enemies the Romans. Both rival nations operated similar kind of governments (the Republican Oligarchy) with two magistrates, a council of elders with an assembly. Although the two governments look same, their day-to-day implementation of policies very quite different.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Welcome, my fellow Romans. Today I am here to remind you of the horrible things the Carthaginians have done to us. They are weak now, but we must remember how Hannibal the wretched general brought his army and elephants all the way across Spain, Gaul, the Pyrenees, and Alps into Rome, lost 10,000 men and 36 elephants just to fight us. Do you remember how he easily defeated an entire Roman army at the battle of Cannae in 216 BC? How he traveled around Rome, and beat us in battle after battle?…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we discuss the Second Punic war’s outcomes let us briefly point out how it unfolded. Carthage was a growing power. Rome knew this. Rome met them with some rules. The Carthaginians obliged. But the Carthaginians had a new commander which would change that pace of things. His name was Hannibal. Hannibal was destined to be on the offense against Rome, and the time had come when Quintus Fabius offered them peace and war, of which they chose either and the Second Punic wars broke out.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As war raged on, both camps committed atrocities. Decapitating was resorted to in scaring the wits out of their enemies. The Carthaginian, led by Hannibal outflanked and routed the soldiers of the inexperienced Roman leader Flaminius whose head was cut off and was thrown at the Roman troops to sow demoralization. Tit for tat, the Romans inflicted the same fate to captured Carthaginians, military deserters, and those men who sided with the enemy. It was also a scorched earth policy. Italian and Sicilian farms feeding the armies of Hannibal were burned to the ground. (Punic War II – Hannibal’s War,…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays