Preview

Happiness as Defined by Boethius and Thomas Aquinas

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1288 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Happiness as Defined by Boethius and Thomas Aquinas
The concept of happiness has concerned the mind of man since ancient times. Evidence of this can be found in the numerous volumes written on the subject of true happiness and how such a state of mind can be obtained. Two such works, Boethius' The Consolation of Philosophy and St. Thomas Aquinas' Summa Theologica, although written over seven hundred years apart, posit the Christian notion of God as an integral part of human happiness. Differences between the two philosophies come to light when one compares the Platonic ideals of Boethius to the Aristotelian basis of Aquinas' thoughts. However, although both works are excellent examples of theological and teleological thought, neither definitively and undoubtedly proves a link between the Christian God and human happiness.
In order to understand the shortcomings of Boethius' and Aquinas' philosophies, one must first understand the basic tenets of life each proposes. The Consolation of Philosophy is a dialogue between the avatar of logic, Philosophy, and Boethius, who, after amassing huge quantities of wealth and power, is suddenly thrust into the depths of grief by the loss of all he has gained. While bemoaning his fall from grace, he is approached by the figure of Philosophy, and it is here that Boethius first displays his belief in God when he states "God the Creator watches over His creation. The day will never come that sees me abandon the truth of this belief" (Boethius 50). This belief in God is central to Boethius' soon to be conceived understanding of happiness. Soon after this idea is affirmed, Boethius reveals his Platonist attitude when Philosophy comments that Boethius' "[defenses] have been breached and your mind has been infiltrated by the fever of emotional distraction" (Boethius 51). To this Boethius replies, "my memory has been blunted by grief" (Boethius 51). This concept of forgetting what one once knew to be the truth is a central tenet of the Platonist system of life. Indeed,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Pursuit of Happyness by Chris Gardner and Quincy Troupe entails the life story of Christopher Gardner. Like other books that movies are made from, The Pursuit of Happyness movie was very different than the book. In the movie, Gardner starts out in his late twenties; he lives with his wife, Linda, and his son Chris Gardner Jr., who was five-years-old at the beginning of the movie. The book starts out very differently; Gardner is just three-years-old and living in a foster home (Gardner and Troupe 15-16). By the end of the book, Gardner Jr. is barely four-years-old. The major difference between the book and the movie is that Gardner experiences physical, mental, and sexual abuse.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life-satisfaction line of research began in the Enlightenment period and adapts the 18th century Enlightenment kind of thinking. According to Veenhoven (1996), the Enlightenment perspective considers life itself as the purpose of existence while “society itself is seen as a means for providing citizens with the necessities for a good life”. This could also be in line with John Mill’s utilitarian moral theory that assumed that it is the consequences of human actions that count in evaluating their merit and that the kind of consequences matters for human happiness is just the achievement of pleasure and the avoidance of pain.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Happiness is a highly debated topic, and both John Stuart Mill and Aristotle have distinct ideas of what happiness is. These two men have their own, views and opinions. Aristotle and John Stuart Mill have come up with two theories on what is the good for a society. Although these men come from a different time, their theories are used from time to time. The Aristotelian and Utilitarian views are two different viewpoints, yet they continue to influence people.…

    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those who are happiest, never have everything; rather, they are thankful for everything they do have. In an ideal world, everything would be perfect for each of us. There would be no restrictions, no hardships, and no sadness. Unfortunately, such a world is unattainable, which is why we have to make do with the good we do have; something we all possess, no matter how bad things may seem. Dwelling on all the things you do not have will never leave you satisfied, and will never let you be truly happy. Happiness is acceptance, perspective, and embracing all you have.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In simple terms, they may believe that gaining happiness and maintaining a positive attitude towards life does not come from spiritual belief and religion, but it is rather a distinctive quality that an individual is born with and is something that not all people can simply possess. However, with further investigation it is clear that this particular theory is actually false, and the only reasonable circumstance where this argument may come into play is if a person is clinically depressed. Those who consider this theory must understand that happiness is not an element of life that a person simply has or does not have. However, it is actually something that a person must search for over time. This is best exemplified by examining the people who are strongly religious and constantly pray and attend church.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Happiness is all around the world, it is a very genuine and important thing, and everyone wants to be happy. Being happy is what makes life worth living, and it makes life a lot better in every way possible. What makes people happy though? Are bodily and external goods necessary to happiness? I would say no because by which they can make you happy, they are not necessary for human happiness. It’s not what things you buy, the pain, the suffering, or enjoyment your body might get. Human happiness comes from somewhere else within the human. Comparing and contrasting Aristotle’s and the Stoics’ view of human happiness will help give a better clear and logical understanding on what really happiness is and why I believe that bodily and external goods are not necessary for happiness.…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the essay," What Happiness Is," Eduardo Porter shares quotations from sources to define happiness (459-61). I will focus on Gandhi's quotation " Happiness is when, what you think, what you say and what you do are in Harmony,'' Gandhi. In the world on one else steal happiness from you in this manner, only you can. If you do what you say and say what you think, then all is in alignment and you have opportunity for happiness. When they are out of alignment you have internal conflict and happiness will be hard to achieve.My life was good and I was happy. I had a great husband and had recently brought a house in Sacramento, had a good job and a great circle of family and friends.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle and Happiness

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. According to the text a full functioning completely happy person will be mentally, physically, spiritually, financially, professionally, creatively, and socially healthy & well rounded individual. Happiness involves being really alive and not just existing. Aristotle believes that a person should work hard doing what they love, they also shouldn’t devote their lives to acquiring riches since riches don’t provide happiness. One should also reject fame and public success to become happy as self sufficiency is believed to provide happiness. Happiness is a process starting from infancy. A happy life is a life where spiritual, physical and social needs are met under reason and moderation. I think Aristotle recipe of happiness involves a person making a conscience decision to do the right thing in all aspects of their life. I think the happiness he refers to is obtained by living a healthy life, being in tune with our psyche, having a career that we enjoy, having friends and family to love, and having enough riches to support ourselves without gloating about them.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Instead, we will look to a second definition of happiness by Miriam-Webster presenting a definition that more reasonably proposes that happiness is one’s position on life rather than a transient feeling. Miriam-Webster states that happiness is “a state of well-being and contentment.” By introducing this idea of well-being to an explanation of the inspiration of happiness, Miriam-Webster’s definition suggests that different elements, such as health and comfort, are required to create happiness. Many people over the course of history have attempted to define happiness, and some definitions are quite interesting, however, who is to say that any of the definitions are correct or incorrect? To answer the original question asked, “What is happiness?” there is no definite way to define happiness, especially not a definition that will be valid for every person. Happiness is something that is achieved, and once achieved, that person knows that something is different. It is something strived towards in our society because there are so many people facing adversity that many are unable to find their happiness due to their worries. In his book, Brave New World, Aldous Huxley introduces a type of society quite different from our own in which happiness…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    EPICURUS TO MENOECEUS

    • 914 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Epicurus in his letter to Menoeceus backers the necessity of freedom from prejudice, superstition and extremes of emotions in the pursuit of happiness and a tranquil life. The apparent simplicity of this formula allowed detractors to misinterpret Epicurus, depicting him as depraved, hedonistic, anarchistic and atheistic. His aim is to present to us, how to live a happy life. He sees happiness as the fundamental principle of the good life. This paper is an attempt to critically delineate the essential tenets of Epicureanism as articulated in his letter to Menoeceus, and finally to criticize and evaluate in order to arrive at a dependable conclusion. In what follows, it would be apt to briefly consider the personality or Epicurus, before delving into the main work.…

    • 914 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the discussion on defining happiness thickens in the Republic, Socrates starts comparing the makings of a good city to a good soul as a way to successfully segue into explaining what the true meaning of happiness is. He explains that a well-functioning city is equivalent to happiness. If a city is stable and flourishing, then the city as a whole would be happy and the citizens would also be happy, especially if they are free from any internal or external conflicts. Though some can argue that there is no correlation between the well-being of a city and its citizens, one cannot simply ignore that a poorly functioning city directly influences the state of living of its citizens negatively; how can the citizens be happy if their city isn’t functioning…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People have defined happiness as some kind of good of a human being. In Nicomachean Ethics: Book I, Aristotle defines happiness as the activity of living well, which in the Greek word is called eudaimonia. He tends to think that happiness is how we balance and moderate our lives to seek the highest pleasures, which he calls maintaining the mean. In the following excerpt from Book I, Aristotle talks about how happiness presumably consists in attaining some good or set of goods. “Now goods have been divided into three classes, and some are described as external, others as relating to soul or to body; we call those that relate to soul most properly and truly goods, and psychical actions and activities we class as relating to soul” (Book I pg. 7). He is saying that since happiness consists in attaining some good that there are three different types of goods that you can attain; an external goods, which consists of wealth or honor, goods of the body, which is health or physical strength, and lastly goods of the soul, which consists of knowledge, education, and friendship. Aristotle goes on to say how only certain goods are necessary for happiness. “It is correct also in that we identify the end with certain actions and activities; for thus it falls among goods of the soul and not among external goods. Another belief which harmonizes with our account is that the happy man lives well and does well; for we have practically defined happiness as a sort of good life and good action” (Book I pg. 7). He is saying that only certain goods such as health are the necessary preconditions for happiness and that other goods such as wealth is just something extra that help fill out a good life for a virtuous person, but the possession of virtue or excellence is the element of happiness. Aristotle also adds that humans seek different goods that make them happy compared to animals because humans have a rational capacity that when exercised perfects our natures as human beings.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Existence of Happiness

    • 1118 Words
    • 32 Pages

    Happiness, the intangible emotion that we all desire. Is there proof that this emotion even exists? Eduardo Porter has written an essay titled “What Happiness Is”. In this essay Mr. Porter took the time to study the emotion of happiness that we all experience in life. He makes an attempt to question not only his reasons as to why he is happy, but to have the reader question their own sense of happiness as well. What is it that makes us feel joyful emotions, and how can vastly different experiences cause us to feel the same emotion that we call happiness? While searching for the proof of this feeling Eduardo Porter reflects upon his own personal experiences, professional studies and ultimately decides that his questions may never be answered. Porter states that, “most psychologists and economists who study happiness agree that what they prefer to call “subjective well-being” comprises three parts: satisfaction, meant to capture how people judge their lives measured up against their aspirations; positive feelings like joy; and the absence of negative feelings like anger.” This is an important analysis of how we form the idea of how joyful we actually are. Something in life that one person might be ashamed of could improve the level of cheerfulness for another person. For example, the thought of getting a tattoo might cause one individual to feel guilt while another individual might feel pleasure at the same thought. Because there is no definitive formula that provides a calculated experience of happiness for everyone, it is interesting to question what actions or lack thereof in our lives cause us to be cheerful or to lose some of the happiness that we have already gained. The organization of this essay was well thought out and effective. The author opens with the statement, “Happiness is a slippery concept, a bundle of meaning with no precise, stable definition.” This opening statement provokes the reader to question their own beliefs in…

    • 1118 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pilate’s ideals of happiness allow for her to guild Milkman in his journey of discovering his true family. After living with multiple families and being ostracized by almost all of them she decides to live by simple questions, “When [is she] happy when [is she] sad and what's the difference? What [does she] need to know to stay alive? What is true in the world?”(149). With these questions Pilate decides to leave everyones preconceptions about who she should be and how she should live her life behind her. She has decided to let what makes her happy dictate her life and not other people's happiness. Pilates lack of an umbilical cord conveys her disconnectedness from her family in her early life. Once she starts embracing what everyone else…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays