Preview

Hardin Durning Skinner Essay Draft 2

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1468 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hardin Durning Skinner Essay Draft 2
Haley Martin
Lowe
EH 101 – 123
24 April 2015
How Durning and Skinner Proved That Hardin’s Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor Does Not Float In Garrett Hardin’s essay, Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor, Hardin describes the wealthy population of the world as being in a single lifeboat that is almost filled until buckling while the poor population of the world treads water below. Hardin’s essay gets his readers to feel the natural instinct to survive. The lifeboat metaphor that Hardin uses relieves the wealthy population of their moral obligations to the less fortunate, but in addition, puts all of the blame and cause of the depletion of earth’s resources on the poor. As much as his argument may make sense, there are some flaws in his way of thinking. Alan Durning, who noticed that major flaws with Hardin’s essay, wrote on what he thought about the topic that Hardin has brought to his attention. In Durning’s essay, Asking How Much Is Enough, he argues that it is not overpopulation that is depleting the earth’s resources, but overconsumption of the resources by the wealthy population. The arguments in Durning’s essay makes the reader realize that the way Hardin uses the metaphorical lifeboat to persuade his readers into thinking the same thing as he does and shows that Hardin wrongly places the blame of all of earth’s financial stability problems on the poorer population. Hardin uses the metaphorical lifeboat in his essay to give his readers perspective of how limited the resources are on earth by reminding them how much limited space they have onboard the boat. He gives us a visual that only 60 people can be inside the boat at once, but if the capacity of people on the boat goes even one person over the full capacity limit, then the whole boat will buckle and no one will survive. But Hardin wants us to imagine that if there are 50 people in the boat, then how do those 50 people determine who they are going to let onto the boat? He



Cited: Durning, Alan. “Asking How Much Is Enough”. The Anteater Reader. Ed. Ray Zimmerman and Carla Copenhaven. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing, 2007. 404 – 12. Print. Skinner, Joseph K. “Big Mac and the Tropical Forests”. The Anteater Reader. Ed. Ray Zimmerman and Carla Copenhaven. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing, 2007. 413 – 18. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I was first introduced to Peter Singer’s idea of altruistic poverty at Governor’s School. It suggests that to achieve social and economic equality, individuals have to give away all they have until they reach the poverty line. While trying to wrap my mind around this questionable solution to such a complex issue, I realize that my previous way of thinking had been so egocentric. If I gave everything unnecessary for my survival what would my life look like? However, as this idea unveiled my own inadequacies as an altruistic individual, I began to wonder why capitalism does not encourage this altruism from all economic classes.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world consists of different people, civilizations, and ways of life. There are many situations that call for different ways of handling them, like poverty, overpopulation, resources, and famine aid. Two very different points of view about these issues are espoused in two very different essays written decades apart, “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor” by Garrett Hardin and “A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift. Hardin’s view of civilization and the world, although harsh, has facts that could help improve the issues. Even though Swift’s opinion has personal perspective, it isn’t very realistic.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Puritan Prophet

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cited: 1. Hall, Timothy D.. 1st ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc., Longman, 2010. Print…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue of moral obligations towards the global poor has always been a contentious affair to be discussed for fear of problematic resolutions that may affect academia on a personal level. Peter Singer, most notable for his authorship of “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” and the drowning child analogy, presents the rather uncommon normative view that affluent persons are morally obligated to donate more resources to humanitarian causes than the present standard. Singer’s perspective on these seemingly radical moral ideals are confronted by many a pragmatic objection, ranging from entitlement principles to moral inequalities. Nevertheless, Singer builds his argumentative framework in regards to moral obligations to the global poor on solid…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gender and Sara Maratta

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Second Edition. Gerald Graff, Cathy Birkenstein, and Russel Durst. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2012, 2010, 2009, and 2006. 537-44.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kenneth T. Jackson, Karen Markoe, and Arnold Markoe. Vol. 3: 1991-1993. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 2001. 207-209.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of these is The World Food Bank, an organization in the process of being established during the time of the essay’s publication. The goal of the organization, in short, was to provide food for people in countries that had a lack of it. This is, of course, completely in opposition to what Hardin argues we should do, and so it is a very good example. To demonstrate why a global food bank is a bad idea, Hardin attacks it from several angles. First, he debases its intention, stating that while it “appeals powerfully to our humanitarian impulses”, it is not as pure of motive as its lobbyists claimed it to be. He outlines that an organization like that would mean “’Billions for U.S Business’”, using the past example of the “Food for peace program” that did indeed, in historical fact, profit its creators much more than its supposed benefactors. After showing corruption in modern institution of charity, Hardin then defeats it in its own terms, or in other words he argues against it as if it was in reality pure in its intentions. He argues that helping the overpopulated poor only leads to more overpopulation, and therefore a greater demand, that defeats possibility and would ultimately deplete the world’s resources, leading to the suffering of our posterity. Here, Hardin thoroughly defeats…

    • 2561 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the essay “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” author, Peter Singer, exercises his theory about everyone’s moral obligation to help world hunger. Every day people make choices, whether it be what pants to wear, what food items to buy at the store, or whether or not you donate money to those suffering. Across the world there are avoidable sufferings according to Singer as long as people do their part; “if it is in our power to prevent something very bad from happening, we ought to morally do it” (889).…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” he argues that when people abroad are suffering or dying from lack of food, shelter or medicine, it is wrong for people here to spend money on morally unimportant things rather than giving money to help (Hughes). This means that we have a moral obligation to do what we can to alleviate the stress of poverty abroad if it does not do any harm to us helping them. If we are able to benefit people abroad, we should do so. Food, shelter, and quality healthcare are things that should be seen as basic necessities; therefore, not only do we have a moral obligation to help those abroad in need, but we should also have the want to help those in need. Although Singer asserts this claim, he does identify…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In any case, Hardin prefers a different metaphor. Rich nations can be seen as lifeboats. The seas around them are filled with poor people who would like to get in the lifeboat or at least get a shae of the walth. Should we let them in?…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Car Act

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Singer, P. Philosophy and Public Affairs. Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Vol 1. No 3. (Spring, 1972). pp229-243. Published by: Princetin University Press.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Parks, Gordon. Flavios Home. Longman Reader. 7th ed. Judith Nadell, John Langan, and Eliza A. Comodromos. New York: Pearson, 2005. 84-90.…

    • 786 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In "Famine, Affluence, and Morality" Peter Singer argues that affluent individuals, in fact, almost all of us are living deeply immoral lives by not contributing to the relief and prevention of famine. The causes of famine are various and include human wrongdoing, but this doesn't matter, according to Singer. What matters is that each of us can minimize the effects of the famines that are now occurring and can take steps to prevent those that might occur. As we go about our daily business, living our comfortable lives, millions of people, including hundreds of thousands of children throughout the world, are suffering and dying. Singer believes, however, that it is a moral obligation to relieve famine. He says, "At the individual level, people have, with very few exceptions, not responded to the situation in any significant way. Generally speaking, people have not given large sums to relief funds; they have not written to their parliamentary representatives demanding increased government assistance; they have not demonstrated the streets, held symbolic fasts, or done anything else directed toward providing the refugees with the means to satisfy their essential needs" (789). Singer thinks that we, as a society, have done little to help those in need and could actually contribute more.…

    • 692 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    stacks

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hardin compares the lifeboat metaphor to the Spaceship Earth model of resource distribution, which he criticizes by asserting that a spaceship would be directed by a single leader — a captain — which the Earth lacks. Hardin asserts that the spaceship model leads to the tragedy of the commons. In contrast, the lifeboat metaphor presents individual lifeboats as rich nations and the swimmers as poor nations.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays