A Kantian would oppose the birth of savior siblings because
A Kantian would oppose the birth of savior siblings because
Safeguarding is everybody’s responsibility, and includes measures to prevent or minimise the potential for abuse occurring. Protection is considered a statutory responsibility in response to individual cases where risk of harm has been identified…
In lecture we discovered that the precedent adopted in the State vs. Pendergrass case was Stare Decisis, which stands for “stand by what has been decided”. Stare Decisis, in further detail, means when determining the outcome of a court decision, judges look at similar cases dealt with in the past to help determine the outcome of the case presented. Another precedent that could be appropriate for this case is the maintenance of hierarchical relationships. Thinking that children need discipline is the only way this could be made precedent in this court decision. “one of the most sacred duties of the parents, is to train up and qualify their children,” which may deem whipping necessary. The sole reason to whip a child is in best interest for him/her…
Where possible the least restrictive interventions should be used as they can sometimes escalate the problem rather than defuse it. Using the least possible restrictive intervention will prevent further harm to any individual involved and will avoid the intervention being deemed as abuse.…
Further to this, it gives a clear definition for what is meant by ‘harm’ in relation to safeguarding children – for example introducing abuse as ‘ill-treatment’ and how the impairment of health can also be a contributing factor to abuse. Following this, the framework of courts was restructured to ensure consistency of decisions in relation to family court proceedings.…
| |children from abuse or neglect, preventing impairment of their health and development, and |…
“Harm is to be taken to include not only ill treatment (including sexual abuse and forms of ill treatment which are not physical) but also the impairment of or an avoidable deterioration in physical or mental health and the impairment of physical, intellectual, emotional, social or behavioural development:” No Secrets (DH/Home Office 2000) based on the Children Act…
A child has the right to be protected against significant harm (children’s act 1989, every child matters 2004, United Nations Convention on the rights of the child etc.).…
“Safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children is defined as: protecting children from maltreatment, preventing impairment of children’s health or development, ensuring children are growing up in circumstances consistent with the provision of safe and effective care, taking action to enable all children to have the best outcomes.”…
It is recognised that that it is abuse when someone inflicts harm or fails to prevent it. Children may be abused in a family or in an institutional or community setting, by those known to them or by a stranger, for example, via the internet. Child abuse can have major long-term effects on all aspects of a child's health, development and well being. The main forms of ill-treatments are:…
We all have a responsibility in Safeguarding and Protecting children and every child should be kept safe. Safeguarding children is a "multi-agency" organisation. Statutory organisations that work with children have a duty under Section 11 of the Children Act 2004 to ensure their functions are discharged with regard to the need to safeguard and promote the welfare of children.…
• the welfare of children must be the paramount consideration when the courts are making decisions about them;…
The children’s act 1989. This act contains many principles and defines child abuse as a person’s actions that cause a child to suffer significant harm to their health, development and wellbeing. A child’s welfare is paramount and introduced a concept of parental responsibility, rights, power and duties. It also contains details of what local authorities and courts should do to protect Children’s welfare.…
Article 29 – Children’s education should develop each child’s personality, talents and abilities to the fullest. They should also learn to live peacefully and respect the environment and other people…
Child abuse and neglect is considered to be a social and public health problem that can have significant negative developmental impacts on children from infancy to adulthood (Noll, Shenk & Putnam, 2009). The concept of child maltreatment is a broad and all-encompassing term that is used to describe several ways by which children can be subjected to mistreatment by adults. The abuse is considered to be a violation against children 's rights issue hence attracting the attention of community psychologists. Child maltreatment is defined as any behavior being directed to another individual that contravenes the acceptable norms guiding how people should be conducting themselves and that subjects a child to a significant amount of harm. The nature of child maltreatment goes against the core values of Community Psychology. This is evident in that the practice is contrary to the requirements of morally acceptable human tendencies (Harkness & Lumley, 2008). It indicates human’s inability to nurture each other in adverse life situations, depicts a failure to bond with others and to appreciate the linkages formed with each other. Child abuse and neglect expose children to adverse consequences that affect them throughout their lifetime.…
If C1 follows naturally from P1 and P2 as I think most would see, then me must either object to P1 or P2 if we think that C1 is false, or be able to show an exception. An attack on the second premise plainly doesn’t stand. A maltreated or abused child is a very bad thing is it not? We have punishments for people that do so. And therefore wouldn’t the prevention of something like that be a good thing? The other options are an objection to the first premise, or an exception of the conclusion. The only exception to the conclusion would be that people have a ‘Right’ to children. Although this is true, there is a statute that should reign here just as it does in the right of freedom of speech or religion. If abusing the right can lead to considerable harm to one’s self or another, then the right is not present.…