Preview

Harrison Act 1914

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
812 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Harrison Act 1914
The first international initiative to control drugs was the 1909 Shanghai Opium Commission which brought the community together in order to deter the illicit drug trafficking of opium. The Commission later met at conferences in the Netherlands in 1911 and 1913, promoting legislation that would aid them in handling the narcotics problem in their own country.
During this same time period, the United States started to take notice in the favor of prohibition of all “moral evils,” particularly drugs and alcohol. New York Representative Francis B. Harrison was particularly moved by both the Shanghai Commission and the reformists in the Progressive movement who wanted to eradicate drugs, he proposed a two measure system to prohibit the introduction and nonmedical use of drugs as well as regulate the production of drugs in the United States. This became known as the Harrison Narcotics Act of 1914.
The provisions of the Harrison Act imposed licensing requirements on those who manufactured, distributed, sold, imported, produced, compounded and dispensed narcotic drugs. These parties must register with the director of the Internal Revenue Service within the Treasury Department and pay an occupational tax, which increased gradually. It was a way for Congress to monitor the solicitation of opium and coca leaves so they could have records of transactions involving these drugs. They were only allowed for medical and scientific use. Those who were in violation of this act, would face a maximum penalty of five years in jail, a $2,000 fine, or both.
The Harrison Act intended to create income by enforcing taxes involving the sale, trade and distribution of drugs. Congress put this responsibility on the Treasury Department in particular the IRS and the Narcotics Unit of the Bureau of Prohibition. The Treasury made attempts to limit narcotics for medicinal and scientific uses by physicians and druggists. The Act required physicians and pharmacists to pay close attention to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fbn Vs Anslinger

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A year after the stock market crashed, 1930, and president Hoover is in office, America is in a state of existential crisis and people are looking for answers and distractions. The Treasury Department created the Federal Bureau of Narcotics under Harry J. Anslinger who directed the agency until 1962 “and molded America’s drug policy” (The United States War on Drugs). Anslinger who was also a prohibitionist, who believed progress could only be achieved by controlling each individual’s impulses and thought that if enough people were put in jail that America would rid itself of drugs. Nonetheless, with these same beliefs, Anslinger, used these to fight the war on drugs. Armed with a Depression snug budget, and an uphill battle Anslinger tried and failed to get state governments involved with the war effort.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the 1800s narcotics was mostly unregulated drugs. In the 1890s the (S&R) Sears and Roebuck sent out catalogs which offered a syringe and a small amount of narcotics to millions of homes for 1.50. The first American anti-drug law was an 1875 San Francisco ordinance which outlawed the smoking of opium in opium dens. It was passed because of the fear that Chinese men were luring white women to their "ruin" in opium dens. "Ruin" was defined as associating with Chinese men. It was followed by other similar laws, including Federal laws in which trafficking in opium were forbidden to anyone of Chinese origin, and restrictions on the importation…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    STAMP ACT

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During our class election on the Stamp Act, I voted to enforce the Stamp Act on the colonial people. After a great class debate with many good points posed from each side of the argument I decided to stick with my initial point of view on the Stamp Act. After Britain fought a brutal war causing major debt in the country a tax on the colonies who want to be apart of Britain should not be complaining if they are being treated the same way that of those who live in Britain being ruled under parliament paying the same tax. There are many pieces of evidence that support the enforcement of the Stamp Act on the colonies.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 18th Amendment, ratified on January 16th 1919, which prohibited the manufacture, sale, export, import and transportation of alcoholic beverages, happened because of the Temperance Movement. It was believed at the time that alcohol was the main problem in society and that it needed to be removed. This moral issue divided people up between those who were “dry” and those who were “wet”. Either way, it was eventually repealed because of the problems that came from it. While that was at the beginning of the 19th century, today we are facing a similar moral issue: the war on drugs.…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robinson Vs California

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A State might impose criminal sanctions, for example, against the unauthorized manufacture, prescription, sale, purchase, or possession of narcotics within its borders. In the interest of discouraging the violation Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 of such laws, or in the interest of the general health or welfare of its inhabitants, a State might establish a program of compulsory treatment for those addicted to narcotics. Such a program of treatment might require periods of involuntary confinement. And penal sanctions might be imposed for failure to comply with established compulsory treatment procedures. Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197,U.S.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stamp Act

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page

    During the time of the stamp act, Dulany, Jenyns, Pitt, and Grenville all gave their opinions British taxation. Dulany opposed the right of British parliament to tax the colonies without representation, and voiced his objection to "visual representation." Jenyns supported the right of parliament to tax the people since other English cities were taxed as well and they too were visually represented. Pitt also opposed the internal tax on the colonies since he did not support the idea of visual representation and that in the past, parliament wouldn't tax without a representative. Grenville supported the right since he saw it as the right of parliament to do so.…

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first of these was the Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentences4 policy of 1986. This would be the first time that mandatory sentencing would be passed by congress after the Boggs Act of 19515. By November 18th 1988, the Anti Drug Abuse Act6 too would be passed, establishing the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). The ONDCP is headed by reputable ‘drug czars’ who stand as faces of the anti-drug movement.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1970 the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) was put into place by the Congress of the United States Government. This Act, Title II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act, is the federal U.S. drug policy which regulates the possession, use, manufacturing and importation of certain controlled substances. The substances controlled under this act fall under various classifications. These classifications are known as schedules. The legislation created 5 schedules with different qualifications for a substance to be included in each. Schedule I includes some of the drugs that are viewed as seriously threatening while schedule V includes drugs that are viewed as not as threatening. A Schedule I drug must fall under one of the following categories.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention Control Act of 1970 is the principal federal law regulating the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, and delivery of drugs or substances that may result in abuse or physical or psychological dependence and addiction” (Van Dusen, 2010). Certain narcotics, stimulants, depressants, hallucinogens, anabolic steroids and other chemicals are regulated. According to the (DEA) drug enforcement administration the schedule I drugs is the most dangerous. Medical uses have not been accepted and the potential for abuse is excessive. An example of these drugs is heroin, LSD, and marijuana, even though in some states marijuana is a legalized. Schedule II drugs have a high potential for abuse. Example of this scheduled…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The history associated with drug criminalization in America contains more political motivators than concerns for public health and safety. The biggest politically motivated aspect to drug deterrence comes from Richard Nixon’s s war on drugs in 1971 which has created a system that discriminates against minority groups and has had little effect on deterring drug use. The war on drugs has thus far been notoriously noted for discriminating against people of color by pumping drugs into their communities and then imposing severe criminal consequences for drug possession, use, or distribution. In fact, one of Nixon’s aides John Ehrlichmen stated that the war on drugs was intended for the following:…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Thirteenth Amendment loophole was responsible for the creation of President Nixon’s “War on Drugs”. John Ehrlichman, Nixon’s advisor of x once stated, once stated, “We understood we couldn't make it illegal to be young or poor or black in the United States, but we could criminalize their common pleasure. We understood that drugs were not the health problem we were making them out to be, but it was such a perfect issue...that we couldn't resist it (cite).”…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before President Richard Nixon declared war on drugs in 1971 he enacted the Controlled Substance Act of 1970. The federal government uses the Controlled Substance Act to outline the drugs into five classifications or schedules. They are categorized by the level of dependency, abuse potential and their medical use. A doctor may choose to prescribe you a drug but regulations are set into place to limit them from the amount and dosage to avoid abuse and dependency to each substance. A doctor is registered with the Drug Enforcement Agency and given a registration number. When prescribing a controlled substance the medical practitioners Drug Enforcement Agency registration number must be used to help keep track of the amount of each prescription…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Opium Debate

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page

    Diana Ahmad in The Opium Debate and Chinese Exclusion Laws in the Nineteenth-Century American West (University of Nevada Press, 2007) argues that in addition to the traditional explanations for the Chinese Exclusion Act, (economic, political and more recently, prostitution) smoking opium was part of the reason many Anglo-Americans pushed for Chinese exclusion. Ahmad also distinguishes smoking-opium and medicinal-opium as two separate entities, claiming that it was the smoking variety that offended the moral character of Anglo-Americans.…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    hearings; that it was to protect the citizens from were determined to be a dangerous drug.…

    • 2426 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marijuana Exploratory

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “DEA, Controlled Substances Act.” Welcome to the United States Department of Justice. Web. 08 Apr. 2010.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays