Preview

Hart's Rule of Recognition and American Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1937 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hart's Rule of Recognition and American Law
Robert Gissubel
Hart’s Rule of Recognition and American Law According to Hart, a rule of recognition is the basis on which a society deems its laws to be valid. It is the reason for people in a society to act in accordance with primary and secondary rules set forth by the governing power. The primary justification for adherence to law is interpreted as the rule of recognition, for it defines obligation to such law as a standard for society. This foundation provides criteria for the validation of law and, though commonly understood within a society, can still be referenced as a justification. Furthermore, a rule of recognition acts as the final justification in a series of statutes. When considering the U.S. legal and political system, the rule of recognition can be defined by how well a rule or law adheres to the U.S. Constitution. This in turn decides obligation of U.S. citizens to obey them. It may be argued that the Constitution itself is the rule of recognition, but as Hart states:
“The existence of such a rule of recognition may take any of a huge variety of forms, simple or complex. It may, as in the early law of many societies, be no more than that an authoritative list or text of the rules is to be found in a written document or carved on some public monument… In a developed legal system the rules of recognition are of course more complex; instead of identifying rules exclusively by reference to a text or list they do so by reference to some general characteristic possessed by the primary rules.” (p. 45-46)
The U.S. legal system is considered a developed one that consists of many levels of statutes, amendments, and precedence. Simple reference to the Constitution cannot provide complete justification for the existence of a rule. Instead, one must take into account the rule’s relation to the Constitution, previous interpretations of related rules, and the possible conflict this rule may have with the previous rules. Observation of these relations is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    References: Carp, Robert A., Ronald Stidham, and Kenneth L. Manning. "chapter 6." Judicial process in America. 8th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2011. 125. Print.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Framers of the United States Constitution vested immense power in the judicial branch of the government. Over the years, the highest Court of the land, the United States Supreme Court, has ruled on a multitude of cases, making new laws and setting precedence. The American people deem the judicial body supreme and, perhaps irrationally, trust they will interpret the Constitution more accurately and ethically compared to the executive and legislative branches. However, decisions of the courts are not purely legal, but rather a synthesis of attitudinal, legal, and strategic processes.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    National Pastime Case

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Berger, supra note 6, at 209; and C. Paul Rogers III, Judicial Reinterpretation of Statutes:…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Matrix and the US Constitution PART I INTRODUCTION During my twelve years service as a Judge, I always insisted on the truth and placed justice above law and order! I could have prepared this article indicia of a research paper however; people tend to lose interest when articles of this nature become too technical. Science has taught us that, “For every action there is a positive reaction!”…

    • 18144 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Constitutional interpretation has been among the foremost politically pressing issues since the moment the ink from the founder’s pens dried. The vague, broad wording – originally intended by the founders to allow the constitution to grow with our fledgling democracy – has led to intricate disputes arising over issues such as the true meaning of the word “commerce” and the intended extend of federal jurisdiction in Marbury v. Madison. After over two centuries of contestation, the court has organically settled on two basic methods of interpretation, each championed by leading Supreme Court justices: Originalism and Non-Originalism. Despite arising from individual personal ideologies of justices, they have come to be the defining methodologies…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kayser Case Analysis

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The American legal system is a complex system with many moving parts. Without the guidance of lawyers, many citizens are left thoroughly confused by the complexities of the court. The court, in both common law and civil law, act as the central means for dispute resolution. The Constitution of the United States of America gives Congress the power to set forth new federal laws, or statutes. With all the many statutes and precedents set in convoluted legal jargon, it is advisable to get professional legal advice, when dealing with matters of the law. With matters, such as personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, and proper venue, a case that is improperly…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Work Choices Case

    • 4012 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Castan, Melissa and Joseph, Sarah , Federal Constitutional Law: a Contemporary View (2nd ed, 2006)…

    • 4012 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The work PPA 403 Week 3 The Continuum of Legal Formality includes review of the following parts:…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Robbins Collections School of Law University of California at Berkley. (n.d.). The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. Retrieved from http://www.berkley.edu…

    • 1862 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Procedures

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We are taught that the courts and the Supreme Courts, in particular, are charged with interpreting the Constitution and the laws of the Unites States. We are further taught that the law enforcement should accept such interpertations uncritically and without hesitation. Theory and reality differ for at least four reasons, the Supreme Court sometimes makes decisions on excruciantingly detailed matters that have almost no appliciablility to most law enforcement officers most of the time. The…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If the ‘law’ is a system of ‘norms’ coded legal/illegal, in considering whether constitutional conventions are ‘law’, we must consider whether their definition fits this description.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Law on the books is found in constitutions, laws enacted by legislative bodies, regulations issued by administrative agencies, and cases decided by courts, little doubt exists that decisions by the U.S Supreme court have far-reaching ramifications” (Neubauer & Fradella, 2014). On the other hand “The law in action perspective stresses the importance of discretion. At virtually every step of the process, a choice has to be made whether to move the case to the next step or stop it now. These decisions are made by the legal actors- police, prosecutors, and judges, for example. They are also made by ordinary citizens as well, whether in their role as victims, witnesses, or jurors” (Neubauer & Fradella, 2014). The law on the books is basically the…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rule of Law

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The rule of law is the application of laws consistently, without showing favouritism not authorized by said law, or otherwise deviating from it. The rule of law is often a criterion used in judging whether a country has good government or not. It is a principle that values procedural over substantive fairness. In some cases, for example, even when a defendant is known to be guilty, his case will be dismissed on the grounds that the government violated the law by gathering evidence in ways that violated his rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. The reasoning behind such decisions is that upholding constitutional law is more important than upholding the statute that the criminal violated, which is of lesser authority.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Public International Law

    • 8003 Words
    • 33 Pages

    1. “The quality inherent in a rule that derives from a perception from those to whom it is addressed that it has validity”…

    • 8003 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics