Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Hasty Moral Judgments

Satisfactory Essays
298 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hasty Moral Judgments
Group 2
Reading 290
Professor Lovett
10 February, 2015 Hasty Moral Judgments Human beings make hasty moral judgments constantly, sometimes involuntarily. Our predispositions, whether they are based off opinion or upbringing, often lead us to superficial judgments, with little to no prior knowledge of the individual whom we are judging. Issues like pornography, capital punishment, and abortion strike people at their core. Some are even willing to protest in support of their opposition. These are indeed loaded topics, surrounded by a great deal of controversy; a fight waiting to happen, if you will. So, what is it about these issues that make us question peoples moral compasses? To make proper assessments about the people around us, we must first recognize flaws in our own thinking. We must question what we ourselves deem good or bad before we analyze someone else’s morality. For instance, since prostitution is generally looked down upon, people do not perceive them as honest, nor are they regarded as people with good intentions. People misguidedly use the label Prostitute as a way to judge an individual person. People are full and complex. We possess a wide variety of traits, and how you make your money may say a little about you, but it surely does not define your morality. Hastily judging someone’s morality is not an easy problem to fix; however, if everyone was more analytical, moral judgments would be a bit more reasonable. Once we are aware of this information, it is our duty to spread it. As a society, we have achieved amazing feats of innovation because we are able to deduce, and intelligently formulate what is proper and what is not. Perhaps if we conducted ourselves in the same manner regarding our moral judgments, humanity would achieve some remarkable things as well.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    24, March 2013 Moral Dilema Determination inspired many of the suffering persevere in their rescue efforts which eventually paid off…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Killings by Andre Dubus

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    TABLE OF CONTENTS RS 300 Foundation of Ethics: Morality and Justice FALL SEMESTER Introductory information Mission Statement Letter to Juniors Resources Revision of two Creation of 2 Directions: What is an Ethical Question / Levels of Questions/IPN 5 Think-Pair-Share/Active Listening Directives 6 Classroom Activities: The Jigsaw/Fishbowl Directives 7 Accessing on-line resources 8-9…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    religious ethics can be rigid for moral decision making because if some one has an absolutist approach that means they will only have done answer for a situation there are in for example euthanasia the person might want to die because of the pain they are in and absolutist approach will see that as murder and nothing else, some people will have a relativist approach witch means they think about a decision and all the consequences that factor in to it as well for example, euthanasia my seem right with the person that has the revisits approach. this can link in with situation ethics because you need to use reason based on the christian principle of love to help you make one decision in a situation, which is saying the moral right thing to do in a situation is the most loving witch can be seen as quite rigid because it might be the most loving but is it the right thing to do, in situation ethics choosing the most loving decision may be right or wrong but does it think about the consequences it may hold, because in teleological ethics the morally right or wrong thing to do is based on the consequences therefor it makes moral decision making less rigid because you have to think of the consequences it may have first before making the decision which helps with the impact of that decision because it will have good consequences instead of bad one but you that might only be because you have made morally wrong decision but it has good consequences.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soc 120 Assignment Wk2

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    We are taught the difference between what is right and what is wrong at a young age by our parents or guardians. What is classified as right or wrong can differ between cultures, races, ethnic identities, and by social class. We all have a sense of what is morally right and the relativity of it. There are specific traits and beliefs that are distinctive to every culture, race, and social classes, due mostly impart to the differences we have in what we consider to be morally right. The idea of universal morals shows that through our cultural differences there is still a connection to the moral beliefs that we share, and shows that cultures are more alike than admit.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In our society there is a lot of tension revolving around concepts of morality. Constantly people are debating all over the world whether or not concepts like abortion, homosexuality, gambling, affairs, divorce, contraception, and premarital sex are morally acceptable or morally unacceptable. Right now there are even entire societies that believe the American way of life is morally unacceptable. In Moral Disagreement by Kwame Anthony Appiah, Appiah writes about differing values and morals around the world and within our society. He points out, “we aren’t the only people who have the concepts of right and wrong, good and bad; every society, it seems, has terms that correspond to these thin concepts” (658). However, these concepts…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Frankena (1973) Socrates argued that there were three typical patterns of reasoning in moral matters. The first belief was that no one should harm to another person. The principle was if an action was to the detriment of another human then it went counter to moral reasoning. If a person killed another person for whatever cause then it cannot be justified using moral reasoning. This belief has been used by those who oppose fighting a war, condemning a person to death for a crime, or by those choosing to object to abortions. Frankena (1973) uses Socrates example about escaping from jail to validate the point that the action would do harm to the state. Thus, it would hurt people.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Libertarians support the view that people have free will and so we are free to make moral decisions. For a Libertarian, the key evidence for this is the act of decision making in our daily lives. Hume states that “experience is what we see to be true”, each human being experiences the feeling of being free to make a decision. If experiencing any other action constitutes it to be true, then why not the same for free will? Libertarians argue that we have awareness of the choices we make; we can choose to do anything that we are capable of. Though we are influenced by our environment and experiences, ultimately we can make our own decisions, nothing is inevitable or determined. Libertarians hold the belief of a moral self; humans want to want to do things. For example, a smoker may think it would be a good idea to give up smoking, but their addiction is too strong for them to think it possible or in any way likely; they want to want to give up smoking. Humans are unique in this way and it is this which is called the moral self. Libertarians are dualists believing that the human mind is separate from the physical world. It is because of this that our reason and autonomy, our moral self, can transcend over other causal determinants. Kant argues that by applying reason to decisions we can escape any authority from cause and effect or desires and emotions, we are the agents of our own decisions. Libertarians believe in a forking path of choices rather than the straight road of determinism.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality is a uniquely human characteristic. As it is something we have created but cannot touch. We can assume it is housed in the inner workings of our mind. Morality moves us to action, but we must first determine its origin. The mind has the…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will attempt to give a detailed breakdown of David Hume 's take on morality, and how some of the other philosophers would critique his stance. I will first speak about why Hume believes reason and passion don 't contradict each other. Then I will give Aristotle’s and Aquinas ' view on this conclusion of his. Next, I will speak on how Hume argues that moral judgments aren 't grounded in reason. Afterwards, I will discuss what he considers that moral judgments are founded on. Finally, I will give a critique of Hume 's theory from Hobbes ' perspective.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have constructed a tendentious morality. It is overly devout to subtle gradations of external facts that are difficult to prove. It is like…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This world is the abundant soil in which we plant our roots, but the quality and quantity of our growth often falls upon the virtues instilled by our environment. We exist in a society that blossoms with morals based on politics, geography, religion, and countless other variables. In such a society, it is virtually impossible for an entire world to agree on a set of morals to abide by, and therefore our world is saturated with the ideals of moral relativism, whether or not we see it blatantly. Moral relativism is often given the stigma of sprouting impurity or immorality, given the fact that it does not accept that there is a universal moral codex.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Niccolo’ Machiavelli had their own perspectives on what was moral and immoral. King and Machiavelli view what was morality right and how they would use this judgment in government and how it affected people in everyday life. King fought a moral fight against what was described as immoral laws to oppress blacks during an era of segregation in the United States. He believes that sometime it is moral to take action against immoral laws to get the results he and others that fought alongside him desired. Machiavelli as a Ruler, during a time when his country was unstable and constant political in-fighting, believed it was better to be feared than loved, and he took the immoral action of oppression to gain respect morally from his followers as a result. Machiavelli was a believer of the art of war to gain power, while King believed power was achieved in non-violence.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality is deeply rooted in human nature; a human being performs all of the actions in terms of moral principles that is why their origin is highly significant topic. Being limited by the moral ideas, a human being naturally raises such questions, as where they came from, and why they are needed. Nonetheless, there is a problem with direct investigation of morality, because, as Jules Alfred Ayer states that since no moral facts can be known (they are not verifiable), they have no cognitive significance (Stanford Encyclopedia). Therefore, one has to answer one’s own questions by searching for information somewhere else, because morality itself is not a source. At this point, humanity divided into several specific camps, regarding the outcomes…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many in my cluster agreed that a person who smokes does not always have a bad moral character; it just means that they fell into a bad habit. Sometimes bad habits can be brought on by the environment for which one surrounds themselves by. It is said that “a person with bad habits may not always be a person with bad moral character, whereas a person with bad moral character is more likely to have bad habits”.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral schools of thought dictate ethical behavior, however, every culture assigns ethical and moral values differently (Lecture 1). Without a moral or ethical structure, society would not prosper. Clashing cultural values make defining morality complicated. Ethicists argue the minimum conception of morality establishes a starting point based on reason that defines and installs a code of morality or ethics. The minimum conception of morality is an “effort to guide one’s conduct by reason—that is, to do what there are the best reasons for doing—while giving equal weight to the interests of each individual affected by one’s action” (Rachels 13).…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays