Health Promotion Pamphlet: Accident Prevention And Caregivers Of Infants
| Module 1 Rubric: Environmental Factors and Health Promotion Pamphlet: Accident Prevention and Safety Promotion for Parents and Caregivers of Infants v4.4 | Points Possible 6 |
Criteria | Achievement Level | | Unsatisfactory
0%-71% | Less Than Satisfactory
72%-75% | Satisfactory
76%-83% | Good
84%-94% | Excellent
95% - 100% | Explanation of Potential Effect | 0.64 points
Explanation of how the selected environmental factor can potentially affect the health or safety of infants is not given.
| 0.68 points
Explanation of how the selected environmental factor can potentially affect the health or safety is minimally explained and/or inaccurate. | 0.75 points
Explanation of how the selected environmental factor …show more content…
can potentially affect the health or safety is accurately explained. | 0.85 points
Explanation of how the selected environmental factor can potentially affect the health or safety is accurately explained and supported with detail. | 0.9 points
Explanation of how the selected environmental factor can potentially affect the health or safety is accurately explained and supported with detail and thoughtful insight. | Recommendations | 0.85 points
Pamphlet does not offer recommendations on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants. | 0.9 points
Recommendations offered on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants are minimal or inaccurate. | 1 points
Recommendations offered on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants are accurate. | 1.13 points
Recommendations offered on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants are accurate and supported with detail. | 1.2 points
Recommendations offered on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants are accurate and supported with detail and thoughtful insight. | Examples, Interventions, and Suggestions | 0.85 points
Pamphlet does not offer examples, interventions, and suggestions from evidence-based research. | 0.9 points
Pamphlet offers minimal examples, interventions, and suggestions, or examples are offered but they are inaccurate, or not from evidence-based research. | 1 points
Pamphlet offers accurate examples, interventions, and suggestions from evidence based-research. | 1.13 points
Pamphlet offers accurate examples, interventions, and suggestions from evidence-based researches, which are supported with detail. | 1.2 points
Pamphlet offers accurate examples, interventions, and suggestions from evidence-based researches, which are supported with detail and thoughtful insight. | Resources | 0.85 points
Pamphlet does not provide readers with community, national, and Web-based resources. | 0.9 points
Pamphlet does not provide readers with all the resources indicated by the assignment: (community, national, and Web-based resources), or resources provided do not adequately address selected environmental factor, or are missing description and contact information. | 1 points
Pamphlet provides readers all the resources indicated by the assignment (community, national, and Web-based resources), including brief description of resource and contact information. | 1.13 points
Pamphlet provides readers all the resources indicated by the assignment (community, national, and Web-based resources), including brief description of resource and contact information. Qualities of resources selected indicate thoughtful consideration by writer. | 1.2 points
Pamphlet provides readers all the resources indicated by the assignment (community, national, and Web-based resources), including brief description of resource and contact information. Qualities of resources selected and the accompanying descriptions indicate thoughtful consideration by writer. | Research | 0.21 points
No outside sources were used to support the assignment. | 0.23 points
Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. | 0.25 points
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, and/or timeliness.
| 0.28 points
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. | 0.3 points
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. | Presentation | 0.21 points
The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements.
| 0.23 points
The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. | 0.25 points
The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. | 0.28 points
The presentation is good. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. | 0.3 points
The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. | Originality | 0.21 points
The work is an extensive collection and rehash of other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions. There is no evidence of new thought or inventiveness. | 0.23 points
The work is a minimal collection or rehash of other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions. There is no evidence of new thought. | 0.25 points
The product shows evidence of originality. While based on other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions, the work does offer some new insights. | 0.28 …show more content…
points
The product shows evidence of originality and inventiveness.
While based on an extensive collection of other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights. | 0.3 points
The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and sound research. | Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 0.21 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed. | 0.23 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. | 0.25 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed. | 0.28 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech. | 0.3 points
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.
| Paper
Format
(Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 0.21 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | 0.23 points
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
| 0.25 points
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | 0.28 points
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | 0.3 points
All format elements are correct.
|
Criteria | Achievement Level | | Unsatisfactory
0%-71% | Less Than Satisfactory
72%-75% | Satisfactory
76%-83% | Good
84%-94% | Excellent
95% - 100% | Explanation of Potential Effect | 0.64 points
Explanation of how the selected environmental factor can potentially affect the health or safety of infants is not given.
| 0.68 points
Explanation of how the selected environmental factor can potentially affect the health or safety is minimally explained and/or inaccurate. | 0.75 points
Explanation of how the selected environmental factor …show more content…
can potentially affect the health or safety is accurately explained. | 0.85 points
Explanation of how the selected environmental factor can potentially affect the health or safety is accurately explained and supported with detail. | 0.9 points
Explanation of how the selected environmental factor can potentially affect the health or safety is accurately explained and supported with detail and thoughtful insight. | Recommendations | 0.85 points
Pamphlet does not offer recommendations on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants. | 0.9 points
Recommendations offered on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants are minimal or inaccurate. | 1 points
Recommendations offered on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants are accurate. | 1.13 points
Recommendations offered on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants are accurate and supported with detail. | 1.2 points
Recommendations offered on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants are accurate and supported with detail and thoughtful insight. | Examples, Interventions, and Suggestions | 0.85 points
Pamphlet does not offer examples, interventions, and suggestions from evidence-based research. | 0.9 points
Pamphlet offers minimal examples, interventions, and suggestions, or examples are offered but they are inaccurate, or not from evidence-based research. | 1 points
Pamphlet offers accurate examples, interventions, and suggestions from evidence based-research. | 1.13 points
Pamphlet offers accurate examples, interventions, and suggestions from evidence-based researches, which are supported with detail. | 1.2 points
Pamphlet offers accurate examples, interventions, and suggestions from evidence-based researches, which are supported with detail and thoughtful insight. | Resources | 0.85 points
Pamphlet does not provide readers with community, national, and Web-based resources. | 0.9 points
Pamphlet does not provide readers with all the resources indicated by the assignment: (community, national, and Web-based resources), or resources provided do not adequately address selected environmental factor, or are missing description and contact information. | 1 points
Pamphlet provides readers all the resources indicated by the assignment (community, national, and Web-based resources), including brief description of resource and contact information. | 1.13 points
Pamphlet provides readers all the resources indicated by the assignment (community, national, and Web-based resources), including brief description of resource and contact information. Qualities of resources selected indicate thoughtful consideration by writer. | 1.2 points
Pamphlet provides readers all the resources indicated by the assignment (community, national, and Web-based resources), including brief description of resource and contact information. Qualities of resources selected and the accompanying descriptions indicate thoughtful consideration by writer. | Research | 0.21 points
No outside sources were used to support the assignment. | 0.23 points
Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. | 0.25 points
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, and/or timeliness.
| 0.28 points
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. | 0.3 points
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. | Presentation | 0.21 points
The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements.
| 0.23 points
The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. | 0.25 points
The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. | 0.28 points
The presentation is good. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. | 0.3 points
The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. | Originality | 0.21 points
The work is an extensive collection and rehash of other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions. There is no evidence of new thought or inventiveness. | 0.23 points
The work is a minimal collection or rehash of other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions. There is no evidence of new thought. | 0.25 points
The product shows evidence of originality. While based on other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions, the work does offer some new insights. | 0.28 …show more content…
points
The product shows evidence of originality and inventiveness.
While based on an extensive collection of other people's ideas, products, images, or inventions, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights. | 0.3 points
The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and sound research. | Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 0.21 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed. | 0.23 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. | 0.25 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed. | 0.28 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech. | 0.3 points
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.
| Paper
Format
(Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 0.21 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | 0.23 points
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
| 0.25 points
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | 0.28 points
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | 0.3 points
All format elements are correct.
|