Hedonism
HEDONISM
The view that the only intrinsically valuable thing worth pursuing is happiness.
Ideally, a hedonist will do whatever is possible to maximize happiness in their life, and
minimize pain and sadness. This is an incredibly attractive viewpoint on life for anyone including myself. A happier, more fulfilling life with more money, friends, and great health. But there have been many ethical theories on what is the "correct" way to pursue pleasure. Epicureanism is based on the belief that goodness is in the form of tranquility and freedom from fear. These were achieved through knowledge and friendship. Utilitarianism states that the proper course of action is one that maximizes the overall good of the society. This action should obtain the greatest amount of total happiness. How do you tell which is right? I'd say that's entirely the prerogative of every individual. I believe happiness is a key component to a good life and how the happiness is achieved is also important. Happiness should be maximized, not just for yourself, but for those around you as well. I best agree with the definition of hedonism as described by philosopher Michel Onfray. "An introspective attitude to life based on taking pleasure yourself and pleasuring others, without harming yourself or anyone else." Achieving happiness without causing harm to others is a great outlook. So if someone gets an immense amount of elation from inflicting pain upon others, it is wrong. Also, happiness to should achieved by one's own willingness, and not forced upon you by others. Don't let someone else push you in the direction that they think would make you happiest. Contrary to hedonistic views, I do not believe that happiness is the only true aspect to an ideal life. To truly appreciate something, I feel one must experience the opposite. They say, "You don't know what you have, until its gone." I think misery or loss is an important factor to fully appreciate something that could potentially bring
The view that the only intrinsically valuable thing worth pursuing is happiness.
Ideally, a hedonist will do whatever is possible to maximize happiness in their life, and
minimize pain and sadness. This is an incredibly attractive viewpoint on life for anyone including myself. A happier, more fulfilling life with more money, friends, and great health. But there have been many ethical theories on what is the "correct" way to pursue pleasure. Epicureanism is based on the belief that goodness is in the form of tranquility and freedom from fear. These were achieved through knowledge and friendship. Utilitarianism states that the proper course of action is one that maximizes the overall good of the society. This action should obtain the greatest amount of total happiness. How do you tell which is right? I'd say that's entirely the prerogative of every individual. I believe happiness is a key component to a good life and how the happiness is achieved is also important. Happiness should be maximized, not just for yourself, but for those around you as well. I best agree with the definition of hedonism as described by philosopher Michel Onfray. "An introspective attitude to life based on taking pleasure yourself and pleasuring others, without harming yourself or anyone else." Achieving happiness without causing harm to others is a great outlook. So if someone gets an immense amount of elation from inflicting pain upon others, it is wrong. Also, happiness to should achieved by one's own willingness, and not forced upon you by others. Don't let someone else push you in the direction that they think would make you happiest. Contrary to hedonistic views, I do not believe that happiness is the only true aspect to an ideal life. To truly appreciate something, I feel one must experience the opposite. They say, "You don't know what you have, until its gone." I think misery or loss is an important factor to fully appreciate something that could potentially bring