Preview

Hela And Mo Cells: A Rhetorical Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
116 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hela And Mo Cells: A Rhetorical Analysis
I agree that patients should have rights but personally I think that scientific advancement should be prioritized. Without the HeLa and Mo cells, cures would have taken longer to develop. Though it was wrong to keep it in secrecy, if Gey and his team had not taken the cells from Henrietta the world could be very different today. If they had informed Henrietta, she could have denied them taking her cells. In addition, Chakrabarty makes an argument for his patent about an engineered bacteria, where he states “patenting cell lines didn’t require informing or getting permission from the ‘cell donors’” on page 201. Finally, Christoph’s idea of cell ownership compared to oil strengthens the science/doctor’s side.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This is the reason why Henrietta’s cells were immortal and kept growing. A documentary on HeLa cells and Henrietta’s contribution finally gave credit to the Lacks family. The family is still upset because they can’t even afford healthcare but their mothers cells are used everywhere. As Skloot was writing the book many people tried to prevent the family from even talking to her. Eventually Skloot gains Deborah’s trust. The stress of all that has happened in Deborah’s life causes her to become sick and she eventually has a stroke. Although The HeLa cells have led to many great contributions in the studies of viruses the book leaves the reader wondering how the family of Henrietta could have been treated so poorly considering Henrietta’s huge contribution. Henrietta’s case has also had monumental effects on laws about how patients are treated, because of Henrietta patients must give their consent rather than be tested on without their knowledge. Henrietta has had a huge role in science and for this along with her cells her contributions will live on…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) "Though no one had told Henrietta that TeLinde was collecting samples or asked if she wanted to be a donor – Wharton picked up a sharp knife and shaved two dime-sized pieces of tissue from Henrietta’s cervix" (pg. 33). Lacks's cells have been an immense help to the medical world, but even with that, it was not justifiable to remove her cells without her knowing. It was wrong for Dr. Lawrence Wharton, Jr. to remove the tissue from Lack because she was not given informed consent about the removal of her cells; therefore, preventing her from making an autonomous decision. According to Kant, it is vital to treat people as means rather than ends (powerpoint slide 2). It may be argued that it was justifiable to remove a sample of tissue from Lacks because they have played a key role in many medical breakthroughs;…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ethical issue presented is the story of Henrietta Lacks, or more aptly, the use of her cells. Mrs Lacks was born in 1920 and grew up as a poor, uneducated woman. Around 1951, at the age of 31, she passed away due to cervical cancer. Before she died however, doctors at the Baltimore hospital where she was treated, removed some of her tumour cells. These cells were soon discovered to be unique, as they could thrive in laboratory conditions, something which was never seen before in human cells.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henrietta’s cells went on to help save millions of lives and improve science but she never gave consent, even though consent didn't matter in 1951 it does matter today and it should matter because many people have a strong sense of ownership and scientist should remember that behind every piece of tissue there is a person with feelings and they might want to know if their tissue is being taken for research or used to make money. Henrietta is one of the most important women in science, but she and her family never received a dime from the companies that were making millions off of her cells, this is unfair to Henrietta and her family because their mother died and they went through hell growing up so the least they could get is some money although it doesn't bring back their mother it could help them do a little better. HeLa cells are the first immortal cells and they've had a great impact on science, but it was wrong to sacrifice an individual for the betterment of society without her knowledge because her cells helped many but she was never told that she was being used for research, like they should've told her, and many companies made money from her cells, but Henrietta's children didn't receive…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think in today’s society, scientists are constantly pushing on the ethical line to make or save as much money as possible. Dr. Gey taking Henrietta’s cells, for example, was an effort to save time and money. Although he may not have directly been thinking of it that way at the time, getting Henrietta’s consent may have been impossible because she didn’t trust the doctors office, or it would have taken more time to explain what he wanted to do and why. Still though, with the cultural and social situation of the time, some people believe it was acceptable to take Henrietta’s cells without her knowledge. If it’s okay to take someone’s cells, regardless of the time period, then does that make it okay for a doctor to give someone cells or diseases…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Problems with ethics and research have long been disputed because of the many consequences that the research could yield. For instance, the medical research in Henrietta's case has helped millions of people through the development of vaccinations and cures, however, there is an ethical dilemma. Obtaining samples from living patients without consent is unethical, yet, there is more debate when the patient is no longer alive. Perhaps the only way to alleviate problems that are similar to Henrietta’s case would be to make up for the lack of consent through compensation from the HeLa cells’ profits. Ultimately, the…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henrietta Lacks Analysis

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The chief injustice of this book was the lack of informed consent and repeated privacy violations. Henrietta Lacks, as a patient at John Hopkins Hospital, had not been informed that samples from her cervix had been collected, nor had she been asked if she was interested in being a donor (p. 33). No one bothered to explain to the Lacks family the science behind HeLa cells, and the so the family was never informed of the removal, distribution, or sale of Henrietta’s HeLa cells.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hopkins, its doctors, and researchers never thought about whether or not her cells were taken with consent or contacting her family. “ Years later, when I asked McKusick if anyone had tried to get informed consent from the Lacks family, he said, “I suspect there was no effort to explain anything in great detail.” But someone should have explained everything to them and made them aware of what was going on. Even after Henrietta’s cells were taken without consent the Lacks family deserved to know was happening with Henrietta’s cells. Susan Hsu who worked with McKusick later stated that she felt very bad because at the time no one thought that the Lacks family would not understand.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead it was decided that these cells would continue to be secret and the family would remain in the dark while medicine and science evolved. This is yet another prime example where informed consent is avoided and there is nothing done to correct or compensate for these tissues samples that were wrongly taken. We do have to keep in mind that up to this point the family was in the complete dark and ultimately being taken advantage of. The Lacks were a low class, poor family, there were also African-American and had very little knowledge about ethics or even consent. These researches never planned to tell the Lack family about He-La cells and I believe that they used race to their advantage.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    She was forced to drive all the way to the hospital because it was the only one in the area who treated black patients. The hospital sometimes felt that because they were not receiving any compensation for their work, that they would just take samples from patients without their written consent. Henrietta’s case was one of these occurrences. The Lacks family was not even made aware of the cells until 20 years after her death and while others were making millions off them, the family saw none of the profits. They were denied access to information about the cells because of their race and because the hospital knew that what they were doing was…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hela Cells

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the nonfiction book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, Rebecca Skloot argues that the Lacks family should be compensated for the exploited use of Henrietta’s Cells. It is unfortunate that the Lacks family did not know that research was being done on Henrietta’s cells, which made the family feel like they were betrayed by doctors at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, but it was a common practice of doctors in the 1950s and consent was not required for research as it is today. Also, it is unfair that Samuel Reader and Monroe Vincent, the founders of Microbiological associates, a cell distribution company, made millions off of selling HeLa cells. However, it is evident that just because a family felt like they were being cheated by doctors and related to Henrietta, they should not receive compensation since they made no scientific contribution to the medicines and technologies created from the use of the HeLa cells. The research done on these cells makes it apparent that if the Lacks family knew that researchers were using Henrietta’s cells, researches would not have been able to find cures for epidemics that killed millions of people.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After reading the Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks I was truly touched and surprised with all of the studies they discovered about HeLa cells, and the court decisions that lead to today’s evolving policies concerning patients’ rights to medical consent procedures. The life story of Henrietta Lacks and her family was very interesting while it explained all of the social, economic, and everyday life struggles. I liked how the novel weaved together Henrietta’s childhood, young adulthood, diagnosis, illness and tragic death. The story had a huge impact and much success with making a foot print on medical research because of HeLa cells. The novel did great with recording every bit of discovery of the HeLa cells such as the creation of the multimillion dollar industry around the cells. It captured the HeLa discoveries from beginning to end. “Henrietta’s were different: they reproduced an entire generation every twenty-four hours, and they never stopped. They became the first immortal human cells ever grown in a laboratory.” It told the removal of the cells, and how all the research contributed to scientific breakthrough. The investigation of Skloot led the true story which changed relationships with the surviving members of the family especially Henrietta’s daughter, Deborah. As the HeLa story unfolds so does Henrietta’s family after she passed away. In the novel I felt the biggest empathy for Henrietta Lacks family, especially Deborah,she never appreciated the injustice her family suffered as a result of doctors at John Hopkins taking her cells. reading about how poor her family was and how they barely had money to live by broke my heart. The cells where making big money while they had no idea they were using their own mothers cells. As Skloot said in the book” She's the most important person in the world and her family living in poverty. If our mother is so important to science, why can't we get health insurance?” It really captures the injustice at the time…

    • 359 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks written by Rebecca Skloot, there is a debate over whether Americans should be hopeful for the future of healthcare or whether to be pessimistic about what’s to come. There are times where people can see both sides of the argument and it is understandable why people have different points of view based on the argument. In the story, we see Henrietta’s cells used as research and the information is kept away from Henrietta’s family. Even though by keeping the cells alive and hiding it from the family is illegal, there have been positive benefits by helping to find a cure for disease, medications and saving the lives of many people. We also see the Lacks struggling with affording healthcare, today we see…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Doctors, researchers, patients and virtually anyone interested in the future of medicine are intrigued by the key role human embryonic stem cell research could have in curing well-known diseases such as cancer. As much as people are curious about how it could advance medicine in incredible ways, there remains the issue of whether finding a cure using human embryos is ethically sound. The answer to this question is heavily dependent on what status society should accord to the human embryo. Bonnie Steinbock’s “The science, policy, and ethics of stem cell research” is an article published on Reproductive BioMedicine Online that digs deep into this ongoing ethical conflict.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think you make clear that you agree with Virginia Postrel's point in the essay "Fatalist Attraction" that so-called experts should not be allowed to make medical choices that affect ordinary people, based on the notion that it is wrong for humans to try to change the course of nature. I can tell that you have strong feelings about this topic when you talk about the example of your own family members. But I also like that you are willing to keep an open mind as we learn more about biotechnology and especially about human cloning.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays