Preview

Henry Ii Quarrel with Beckett

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1085 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Henry Ii Quarrel with Beckett
Henry’s quarrel with Beckett

Beckett was unusual. He was a commoner promoted to high office. He had been attached to Theobald archbishop of Canterbury as a clerk in his household. Very well educated and bright he quickly became a favourite of the archbishop. In the archbishop's household he underwent religious instruction; but had not become a priest before being appointed Chancellor by Henry II (1154)
Not only does his position give almost daily access to the king and therefore a lot of influence but also a high rate of pay. When a peasant could live on £1.50 a year, Beckett had an income of about £90 a year.
This meant he could live extremely well ; in dress, food and housing. On two occasions Beckett does go abroad; he helps Henry fight against the Count of Toulouse; in 1158 Beckett went to see the King of France to organise the marriage of the French Kings daughter to Henry's eldest son.
This indicates how worldly wise Beckett was. In 1161 Theobald dies; the new archbishop would be chosen by a combination of the monks of Canterbury; the bishops of England and the King. Henry wants Beckett to be the archbishop. He thinks this will help with his reforms. Beckett refuses until forced to accept by Henry on the second of June 1162 Beckett was made a priest ; on the third of June he becomes archbishop of Canterbury.
Beckett would have been seen by the other bishops as the 'king's man' put in charge of the church to do whatever the king wants. However Beckett chose to follow the path of supporting the church. His first act was to resign as Chancellor. 1163 July – Henry has his court at Oxford.-Sheriffs Aid- an extra payment made to sheriffs by landowners. Henry wants this direct to the King or exchequer. Beckett states that sheriff's aid was not a royal tax but a direct payment to sheriffs;Beckett won to Henry's fury.
This will come to a climax with the “Constitutions of Clarendon” 1164.
Henry calls a meeting (January) of leading nobles and clergy.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    For the greater part of the 1630’s Englishmen paid their taxes, most likely grumbling whilst doing it, but they were paid. During his personal rule 1629-40, Charles I needed to raise revenue by using non-parliamentary means, i.e. in ways he would not need a parliament’s permission to collect. In order to do this, Charles changed certain policies to make them more financially gaining and brought back taxes that had not been used for numerous years, ranging from Ship Money to Credit to Monopolies.…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every monarch of the time had to handle their Nobility, and it was no different for Henry. In fact Henry used very effective policies in order to strengthen his control over them. A notable policy would be the Acts of Attainders, in 1485 & 1504 he used this policy to declare 56 Nobleman guilty of crimes against the Crown. Thomas Howard lost the title Duke of Norfolk and his family estates after Bosworth, Henry was able to gain huge amounts of income from these Acts which increased his fragile control over the Nobility. As a result of the Acts of Attainders, the about of over mighty noble families numbered 5 in 1497, this shows how successful his financial…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mr Karl Curran

    • 346 Words
    • 1 Page

    Another reason why Lanfranc was made primate was the factor of him asserting primacy of the Archbishop of Canterbury. Lanfranc asserted the primacy of the Bishopric of York, at the time held by Thomas of Bayeux, conformation of this was at the council of Winchester in 1072, which was supported by the papacy. Therefore he was made primate because Lanfranc centralised the church under one leader, which was himself, thus guaranteeing William ultimate loyalty from the church. Lanfranc was made Archbishop of Canterbury due…

    • 346 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another way his family influenced his career is that they he was from a family of goldsmiths. This influenced his career because he had knowledge of…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The power of the Nobility was the most important cause of unrest in the period of 1450 to 1470. ‘How far…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first suspect I think was guilty was himself, Thomas Becket. This is because the king ordered this archbishop (Becket) to reform the church courts, but Becket had his other plans and disagreed, by saying, “ the one who stands before you only serves God” and as Thomas Becket refused to do so, the king ended up getting angry.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To an extent, Opposition to the religious reforms by Henry VIII wasn’t overly serious, the opposition did have some potential to cause damage but the danger was never severe enough to undermine the Tudor dynasty or threaten the omnipotent once of the “Most Christian King”. Opposition was only as serious as the support it had, which is why The Pilgrimage of Grace of 1536 was the most dangerous form of opposition. Henry ensured that disapproval from his kingdom would never threaten to undermine the longevity of the Tudor dynasty by using Cromwell’s key weapon: The Treason Act of 1534. This allowed Henry to eradicate any opposition that had potential to threaten Henry. The religious changes came to a halt in 1540, where Henry sends out a strong deterrent message by executing the architect of the religious changes, Cromwell.…

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Riot After Riot 1700s

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the 1700’s, in a kingdom in England, there were a lot of people in poverty, and very few people that had money. And those people were the royal family, and their helpers. The king was, Alexander The Great II, the queen was, Queen Elizabeth, and the prince was, Alexander the Great III.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since I started playing football, I’ve come across teammates and coaches who fight through the effects of brain injuries on a daily basis. Those experiences alone helped me decide at a young age that I wouldn’t let my children play football. As a child, I wasn’t informed about head trauma and it continues to haunt me each day. I was just chasing a dream, hoping to change my family’s lifestyle and fortune. My children won’t need to risk their brains for this same goal, thanks to the benefits I’ve received from playing the sport professionally.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Geoffrey Chaucer lived a fulfilled life during the 14th century in comparison to others during the Middle English period, many of whom often lost their lives at an early age due to disease, famine, or war. Chaucer was born into a family with relations to the church and soon became a civil servant to the king in his early teen years. For decades to come he would continue to rise in status as a servant of the church, allowing him to also become very well educated and begin his works as a writer; a title he otherwise may have never established had it not been for his rank in the church. That being said, many are left to wonder if it wasn’t the church that brought Chaucer to his final days due to his elicit and provocative writings known as the Canterbury Tales.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Domesday Book

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Soon after William became king of England in 1066 he introduced the position of sheriff. They were officials of the crown who were responsible for the administration of royal estates and shires; collecting tax on the king’s behalf; and were responsible for leading the king’s military in times of turmoil. Although William left most of the administration of the country as it originally was, he was insistent on retaining the tax system of geld. He kept the process of shires and hundreds on which it was based and ‘laid taxes on people very severely,’ but spent time learning about how England was governed. The Anglo-Saxon way of local governing was different to the Normans where ‘the absence of local, popular institutions was the most striking difference’.…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Western Europe

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    allowed the King to choose bishops and abbots; and the Pope to collect the first years income of new…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The King had power over the soldiers, farmers, and tradesmen living in his kingdom with the help of his counts, barons, dukes, and other nobles (s5 16), and therefore, needed powerful nobles to help him control his lands (s7 26). The king got a great army of knights from his lords (s1 10). Also, he received loyalty and military services from the nobles (s5 27) and offered protection and land grants to them in return (s5 27). The king got goods and services from everyone in all social classes (s5 27), however, he needed advice on certain matters, which his vassals fulfilled when the king required it (s6 103). The king had many necessities despite his class in society, that were met by the feudal…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chaucer essay

    • 799 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Typically a Monk spends his days in a Monastery studying, praying, and working hard for the greater good. The Monk in “The General Prologue” to The Canterbury Tales is almost just the opposite. He is very defiant and wishes to rule his own life and live the way he wants too. Chaucer, the narrator in The Canterbury Tales, does an excellent job at highlighting some of these defiant characteristics of the Monk.…

    • 799 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A powerful lord let the lesser-lord enjoy the land, hold the land against military service. This is not entirely new. Land for service was already in place before the Norman conquest. The Norman conquer extended the system along the French model, which led to deep transformation of social relation. The feudal system imposed by the Norman was a triangular system. At the top: the king of England who controlled all the lands in England. The next level is made of barons (high aristocrat) and on the other side there is the bishops (social equivalent of barons). The barons were the main tenant and they hold their land directly from the king and gave it to a certain number of knights. The knights are slightly below the barons and they were the fighter. They hold their land from the barons in exchange for direct military service. Of course, they had less land than the barons. Below the knights were the peasants and they were three kind of…

    • 1984 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays