Preview

Henry V: Machiavellian Or Ideally Christian?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
922 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Henry V: Machiavellian Or Ideally Christian?
In Shakespeare’s Henry V, Henry V is much more Machiavellian than ideally Christian. Henry V inherited a usurped crown and needed to both prove himself as a powerful king and a great Christian king. King Henry was able to accomplish appearing both a Christian and a Machiavellian king through being mostly Machiavellian.
King Henry practices prudence by being lenient during times of peace and unforgiving in times of war. An “excess of wine” (2.2.42) caused a subject to speak out against King Henry in Act 2. In a deceptive and manipulative manner, Henry V asks Scroop, Cambridge, and Grey for their opinion on the matter of the unruly subject, even though he was already planning to pardon the man. I do not believe Henry V pardoned the drunk out
…show more content…
How strong or true the relationship with God was is unknown, but Machiavelli would have eagerly approved of Henry V’s multiple references to God. Machiavelli’s states that nothing is “more necessary to appear to have” (The Prince, 70) than religion. If his relationship with God was true, which I believe it is to some extent, Erasmus would have also approved. After the Battle of Agincourt, King Henry finds out that 29,000 French have died compared to his 1,000 soldiers. He proclaims that “God’s arm” (4.8.108) was there at the battle and all of the glory and honor is “to thy arm alone” (4.8.109). Winning the Battle of Agincourt, especially by such great measures, created the allusion that he was heavily favored by God. This undoubtedly increased his popularity with his subjects and helped form an even more Machiavellian Henry …show more content…
Before going to battle, Henry V disguises himself as a commoner and set out to find out what the morale is like in the camp. This was a very clever act, because he could have just as easily sent one of his men to figure out what was happening at the camp. Knowing what the morale in the camp was like proved to be very beneficial when Henry V delivers his St. Crispin’s Day speech. Before the Battle of Agincourt, Henry V delivers a passionate speech to his “band of brothers” (4.3.60) that riles them up and helps get even more approval of his seizure of France. The speech makes Henry V a true “example of humanity and munificence” (The Prince, 91), because not only does he set himself apart as an almost godly figure, he also fights with his men. Fighting in the Battle of Agincourt alongside his men helped hold “firm the majesty of his dignity” (The Prince, 91). Machiavelli advised princes to “meet with” (The Prince, 91) their subjects and to know how they are perceived by their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ‘How far was Henrys foreign policy merely defensive in the years between 1487 and 1509?’ (24 marks)…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Catholic Church was very powerful in England. Henry hated the fact that his country should allow someone else to have so much power of them. After all, Henry was very lustful for power, and was used to getting what he wants when he wants!…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was a hero, he fought without a question. He didn’t fear anything, he followed his mother’s instructions and didn’t talk or trust anyone. He didn't worry or question his courage, or share any sign of self doubt. Henry kept to himself, yet stayed preoccupied with his own speculations of the other men there. Though, when the night fell, Henry and the other soldiers worried that the enemy would appear at any given moment. When the enemy failed to materialize, Henry went back to thinking of the other soldiers and started to inspect their behaviours. Later in the battle, one morning, him and the other soldiers hear distant gunfire, and the regiment begins again. Though he wanted to run,Henry was kept in by his fellow soldiers as the officers goad them toward the battle and realized that even if he wanted to run, the surrounding soldiers would shame and trample him. Hours into the battle, as he passed the corpses, Henry gets vulnerable, and curses the officers who he thinks are leading them to their…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The power of the Nobility was the most important cause of unrest in the period of 1450 to 1470. ‘How far…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you agree with the view that it was virtually impossible for effective opposition to form against Henry VIII’s Reformation? Explain your answer, using sources 1, 2 and 3 and your own knowledge. (40 marks)…

    • 611 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VIII pt. 2

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry's most important minister early in his reign. Wolsey became Archbishop of York in late 1514, was created a cardinal of the Catholic Church the following November, and became Lord Chancellor of the realm in December 1515. Wolsey achieved singular stature in these offices. Since Henry was not so interested in administration as his minister, Wolsey took over many of the duties of kingship, overseeing England's finances and diplomatic relations with other European powers. Henry became extremely dependent on Wolsey, whose zeal and ability as an administrator made him indespensable. Among Henry's contemporaries on the European continent, many considered Wolsey to be the true ruler of England, since it was to him that foreign officials were often directed to address concerns meant for the English king.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To an extent, Opposition to the religious reforms by Henry VIII wasn’t overly serious, the opposition did have some potential to cause damage but the danger was never severe enough to undermine the Tudor dynasty or threaten the omnipotent once of the “Most Christian King”. Opposition was only as serious as the support it had, which is why The Pilgrimage of Grace of 1536 was the most dangerous form of opposition. Henry ensured that disapproval from his kingdom would never threaten to undermine the longevity of the Tudor dynasty by using Cromwell’s key weapon: The Treason Act of 1534. This allowed Henry to eradicate any opposition that had potential to threaten Henry. The religious changes came to a halt in 1540, where Henry sends out a strong deterrent message by executing the architect of the religious changes, Cromwell.…

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Henry snooped around at night in disguise, he looked for opinions of what the soldiers thought of him. The Chorus called this: “A little touch of Henry in the night” What Henry found out, is that the soldiers all respect him, but some doubt his cause to invade France. He came across one of his old friends, Ancient Pistol, who shows his affection towards Henry, even though Henry killed one of Pistol’s best friends, Bardolf: “The King is a bawcock, and a heart of gold,, A lad of life, an imp of fame…” I am led to believe that Henry V was an ideal King with some traits that could show him as a ruthless tyrant.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During and throughout the reign of Henry Tudor there were numerous changes that took place in regards of religion itself and as a result of this, religious divisions (which still resonate today) inevitably took hold in England. Initially and arguably so Henry was staunchly Catholic from the get go and on the outside certainly portrayed this in the beginning of his reign, however he also repeatedly made decisions which more than hinted at a lean towards Protestantism. At a time when radical religious ideas were spreading, England was displaying an eager aura for change but the changes that followed were not in fact the result of Henrys shifting beliefs. More so, they were a result of his seemingly growing obsession…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry V Ethical Analysis

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It has never been agreed upon that life is an absolute right, but only that death is the absolute outcome. Philosophers call it a prima facie right, this right gets forfeited in actions such as aggravated murder, abortion, physician-assisted suicide, and other heinous crimes. However, the great western powers are on sure footing when it comes to this type of permitted murder, but a just war doesn’t make a total war acceptable. Williams Shakespeare’s play Henry V is loosely based upon England’s own ethical dilemmas in the early 1400’s. This is especially true when conflicting governments go into a war just because one side believes themselves to be in a just war the other may not.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry V used ethos and pathos to convince his army to fight along his side during one of the many battles in the Hundred Years War. This battle in particular was the Battle of Agincourt in 1415. Right before they went off to battle, Henry used pathos much to his advantage. It’s not easy to go into battle, especially if you have no other choice than to go into battle. But he easily gains his army’s trust my insuring them of the future, “He that outlives this day, and comes safe home…,” this gives them hope and another reason to fight for. Adding on to the future, he touches a small part in their heart by saying, “this story shall the good man teach his son.” Every man on the battle field must have one thing in common and that is to have a son…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He pursues his goals incessantly to the end and presents himself as an unstoppable force. The psychological weapon that Henry utilizes has a powerful strength which is essential for the English to win the Battle of Agincourt. With his speeches he can intimidate his greatest enemies and also inspire his troops, being able to persuade nearly anyone who hears him. In each of his speeches, Henry seems to be only speaking his mind, but when analyzing them further one can see they are brilliantly crafted and how they manipulate the minds of his listeners. The power of his words, he and his band of brothers will always be remembered for the glorious Saint Crispin’s…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Red Badge of Courage

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The motives that make up Henry’s desire to win glory in battle are far from noble. The deeper meaning and reason for the war are not the motivating factors in his soldier role-playing drive. For him, it is all about the reputation. Henry feels that the battlefield is a stage for him to put on a jaw-dropping performance, one that earns him a reputation. However, when faced with war, while Henry and his regiment were trying to enjoy a brief moment of sleep, they were awoken by another surge by the opposing regiment. In…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry believes he has passed some sort of trial. He stood in the face of death and battled back, and perceives himself magnificent for doing so. Yet that same day when his regiment is resting they receive a surprise attack from the men of the south. Instead of staying and fighting Henry lets fear over come him and runs into a forest to save his own life. He believes he has done the right things as he does not think anyone who stayed and fought could still be alive. During Henry’s scramble for survival he see’s two officers in a discussion and overhears how his regiment held off the surprise attack. Overcome with guilt Henry dejectedly wonders around trying to find his regiment. He comes across…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The lips of the righteous finds favor, but the mouth of wicked only what is perverse” (New Living Translation, Proverbs 10:32). King Henry VIII lived in England, while Martin Luther was from the German States and Europe. Both men lived completely different lives, and had completely different motives. King Henry VIII was driven by his own wants and needs for the reform. While, Martin Luther was motivated to reform the church for the need to show the truth about God and his persistence to make things right with the Catholic Church. Martin Luther and King Henry VIII both made a movement that changed the church, religion, and thoughts about wealth.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics