Preview

Henry V: Ideal Christian King and Royal Bearing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
388 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Henry V: Ideal Christian King and Royal Bearing
In King Henry V, King Henry is a man of Christian values and a solid foundation of moral principles. Through careful analysis of the entire play, one is able to confirm that he conducts himself with royal bearing.
King Henry is "no tyrant but a Christian king" who is "a true lover of the Holy Church”. This highlights the idea that King Henry is of royal bearing as he acts in accordance with good Christian values. He questions whether he "may [...] with right and conscience make [a] claim to the throne of France”. Surely a man who only takes what he believes belongs to him is of an elevated moral standing and Christian divinity.
King Henry says to his men at Harfleur that "[I]n peace there's nothing so becomes a man as modest stillness and humility”. A ruler who practices and preaches such Christian values conducts himself with royal bearing. King Henry insists that "[he] would have all such offenders cut off" when news of Bardolph's inexcusable crime reaches him. Executing a soldier and countrymen is no pleasant task. However, King Henry once again clearly demonstrates royal bearing and acts according to strong Christian values when making a decision regarding Bardolph.
"When [King Henry] speaks, [...] the mute wonder lurketh in men's ears to steal his sweet and honeyed sentences”. He inspires his men at Harfleur to "imitate the action of the tiger [and] conjure up the blood". Only a man of royal bearing preaching Christian values can arouse such patriotism in the hearts and minds of his followers.
King Henry makes several references to God to ensure that he "delivers [his] puissance unto God”. He strongly believes in the idea that "God [is] before [...] and beside him in all his action”. Everything "lies [...] within the will of God”. These open references to God establish King Henry's character as one of Christian spirituality and royal bearing.
King Henry believes that "if you will France win, then first with Scotland begin". He refuses to go to war with
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How Successful Was Henry Vii in Dealing with Challenges to His Royal Authority?
    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Successful Was Henry Vii in Dealing with Challenges to His Royal Authority?

    One challenge to Henry’s royal authority during the years of 1485 to 1509 was the Lambert Simnel Rebellion. There is evidence that Henry did deal with this threat well. Firstly, he and his army managed to put the rebellion down before it reached London, which would have been a success for him as London is where the rebellion had the most potential to become a serious threat to Henry and his position on the throne. Also, as London is where the rebellion was aiming to get to, stopping it from progressing this far meant that the rebellion was defeated before it had a chance to fulfil its intentions. Furthermore, despite the rebellion occurring only two years after Henry became King, throughout it he retained the support of many nobles. If a number of nobles had switched sides and supported the rebellion, it would have increased the likelihood of it being a success and would have been harder for Henry to defeat. So by keeping these powerful people on side, it meant that the severity of this particular challenge was limited. Additionally, the rebellion only lasted for roughly a year. This is evidence to suggest that Henry dealt with it well as it is not a significantly long amount of time, so he did relatively well at defeating it. However, there is also evidence that opposes this and suggests that Henry was not so successful in dealing with the Simnel rebellion. Firstly, Simnel gained a large amount of support in Ireland (including the support of many Irish nobles) and was even crowned in Dublin. This shows the rebellion was to extent successful as gaining…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Henry Viii and the Break with Rome
    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Henry Viii and the Break with Rome

    The Roman Catholic Church was very powerful in England. Henry hated the fact that his country should allow someone else to have so much power of them. After all, Henry was very lustful for power, and was used to getting what he wants when he wants!…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry V: The Feudal Rulers In The Elizabethan Era
    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page

    Henry V: The Feudal Rulers In The Elizabethan Era

    Henry was using his meaningful speech that arises from his spirit to convey more trust to his followers. This speech was a good example to show how Henry and all other strong feudal rulers in this era used their strength and unique personalities to amaze and persuade but not to force their people to become their followers. The unique and the highly effective speech and the thoughts of Henry v shows how open were individuals in Elizabethan era about expressing themselves to reveal social or political viewpoints.…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did King Henry Viii Annotated Bibliography
    • 4482 Words
    • 18 Pages

    How Did King Henry Viii Annotated Bibliography

    Henry VIII was very much a conformist with regards to his beliefs. His main belief was that God had had…

    • 4482 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mod a: Richard Iii and Looking for Richard
    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mod a: Richard Iii and Looking for Richard

    Shakespeare’s “Richard III” exists as a providential narrative in support of the Tudor Myth; that it was only through the divinely sanctioned rule of Henry VII that brought about peace after an era of turmoil under the reign of Richard III. As such, Shakespeare’s pro-Tudor bias highlights the politically and morally absolutist agenda of his time.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Henry Rhetorical Analysis Paper
    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Patrick Henry Rhetorical Analysis Paper

    Henry referrs to Juxtapositions to make himself sound more credible, therefore building his ethos as he goes on with his speech. "I should consider myself as guilty of treason toward my country and of an act of disloyalty toward the majesty of heaven which I revere above all earthly kings." Henry attempts to explain to the delegates that the topic he is about to address is very controzvertial. He makes it clear that some will disagree with the forthcoming conversation, yet proceeds, feeling as if he would be betraying his country and God if he didn't bring the problems that were currently troubling the colonies to the attention of the common man. He therefore established the idea of putting God before the King. The juxtaposition in this quote identifies itself by mentioning "the majesty of heaven" next to "earthly kings", in which he is comparing the priorities of his worship in which King George falls short to the influence and significance of God in Henry's life. The purpose of using this specific example of a Juxtaposition was to show that Henry puts the will of his God before King George, showing a contrast of authority which also appeals to ethos. By claiming himself as "guilty of treason" he is making an, by other means, unacceptable argument acceptable, therefore building trust and support in his thesis.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    How Did King Henry Viii Corrupt
    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did King Henry Viii Corrupt

    Throughout the history of time, there have been many leaders of the world’s different civilizations. While each leader may have possessed different qualities: some strong, others weak; some righteous, others corrupt…each rule played an important part in shaping the culture of that civilization. Though not every civilization was governed by a leader that had a worldly impact, the rule of England under King Henry VIII, was one of great historical importance. Unlike many leaders of his time, Henry’s legacy was not forged under the motivation of power and greed, but by love and his desire to have a male heir. Henry VIII became the King of England in 1509 after the death of his father Henry VII. Like most kings Henry desired to have a male heir,…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Patrick Henry Rhetorical
    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Patrick Henry Rhetorical

    Patrick Henry begins his eminent speech with an apology and a very respectable tone towards the president. He convinces his audience by speaking his feelings. He applies to ethos to connect with his own ethical and moral beliefs. For instance, in paragraph 2 of his speech he declares “I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.” This quote appeals to rhetorical ethos. He speaks of the majesty of heaven as the quality of God. He cannot hold back his heart in such that he must be honest. It also shows how God seems more important than the “earthly kings” as stated. He finds relevance in ethos throughout his speech to give voice and meaning and make connections to his audience. Furthermore, he speaks of church and the name of God, the supreme creator of the universe. Mr. Henry does not preach however, but he shows a biblical allusion as…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Matter of Heart and Mind: Patrick Henry’s “Speech to the Virginia Convention”
    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Matter of Heart and Mind: Patrick Henry’s “Speech to the Virginia Convention”

    Henry uses repetition to help get the point across by saying the same thing over and over again. In the speech Henry repeats the word God because religion was a big part of life and government then. Some repetition of God would be “An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts is all that is left us!” and “Sir we are not weak, if we make a proper use of the means which God of nature hath placed in our power.”(84). Repetition helps because it keeps you thinking on the one thing he wants you to think about.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    King Falsffah Quotes
    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    King Falsffah Quotes

    The last thing that people have to do in order to be a Christian King is doing what is right, no matter what. Being a Christian King is not something easy because sometimes the people that what to be the Christian King need to sacrifice somethings that they love because those things are not right. So as King Henry, who need to completely abundance his friends from the old time when he was a young guy. Hostess said that…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Was henry VII a good king?
    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Was henry VII a good king?

    Henry VII is known for his wise and sensible decisions while in power. Polydore Vergill, a historian, claimed that in government he was ‘shrewd and prudent’ and he was thorough during his ‘wise deliberation’. All of these admirable characteristics are ones that are needed for a leader in order for them to maintain a stable country. This is supported by the speech made at Henry’s funeral in 1509, made by John Fisher. Fisher claims that Henry VII’s ‘political wisdom in governance was singular’. Henry is also documented to have been very kind natured, mentioned repeatedly in both sources 1 and 2. ‘He was gracious and kind and was as attentive to his visitors… his hospitality was splendidly generous.’ This statement is evidence of how Henry treated his citizens and his fairness as a leader. John Fisher also described him as ‘goodly and amiable’. Another trait of Henry VII’s that is mentioned in these sourced are his intelligence. ‘His mind was brave and absolute’ and ‘his speech gracious in diverse languages’ prove henry’s intellectuality, which strengthen his ability to lead and be a good king. Vergil, the writer of Source 2, wrote his statement in during Elizabeth I’s reign. As Elizabeth was Henry VII’s granddaughter, this source could be interpreted as biased as he may have been trying to appease his queen- as offending her may have resulted in serious consequences. However contrary to this, the purpose of source 2 was to inform people of British history, meaning Vergill would…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Prince Hal Is the Politician, While Hotspur Is the Man of Action.
    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Prince Hal Is the Politician, While Hotspur Is the Man of Action.

    Shakespeare’s ‘Henry IV Part I’, presents the young Prince Henry as an ambivalent and enigmatic character who is politically cunning in his ability to read situations and respond accordingly. He is a man of the world through his association with his friend Falstaff, but by the end of the play he has also supplanted Hotspur as a soldier and a man of honour who can take astute action when it is called for. By contrast, Hotspur is very much the man of action, though Shakespeare suggests that action, when it is untempered by thought and political acumen, is a dangerous and deadly quality.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Henry Viii Pursuit Of Glory
    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Henry Viii Pursuit Of Glory

    The pursuit of glory and honour outweighed the security of England in deciding Henrician foreign policy. Although Henry’s foreign policy in this period was greatly influenced by his desire for security, both personal and national, there is much historiographical debate as to whether it was the primary motive of his actions abroad. In this essay glory and honour will be dealt with together, although glory tends to be associated with wartime victory, whereas honour is related to the upholding of status and in particular the dignity of Henry VIII - together both of these contribute to the overall prestigious nature of a monarch and are associated heavily with one another in a late Medieval context. Whilst security was consistent with the desires…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Renaissance Dbq
    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Renaissance Dbq

    Amongst Henry's several undesirable traits, he allows himself to be partial by people who have ulterior motives. The most significant illustration of this is when the archbishops convinced Henry to take over France so it would allow them to be able to save resources for the Church. Henry doesn't accept responsibility for his actions, he places the blame on others. For example, before Henry begins to take over a French village, he instructs the governor to surrender or risk having English troops terrorize civilians. This way, if the governor declines, it would be the governor's fault for the atrocities that would occur. Henry has manipulated his troops to go along with these criminal acts using his most powerful tool - language. He tells the soldiers that what they're doing is noble, and that they should be proud; however, they're attacking another country in order to conquer it. Michel Foucault, in his article, Subject and Power, notes the reason for Henry’s irresponsibility’s when it comes to his position in power. He notes that it is no different than parents over children, psychiatry over the mentally ill, of medicine over the population (Foucault 781). These things need to exist because of the constructs of society. Moreover, Foucault notes that “this form of power applies itself to immediate everyday life which categorizes the individual, marks by his own individuality, attaches him to his own identity, imposes a…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    US and World News
    • 1135 Words
    • 3 Pages

    US and World News

    4. What is Henry implying when he says that he is loyal to "the majesty of heaven... above all earthly kings"? What tone (manner in which an author expresses his attitude) does this statement hold?…

    • 1135 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics