Hillary Clinton Email Scandal Analysis
In this article, Rebecca Morin writes about the email scandal with Hillary Clinton. Morin writes about Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who is a Donald Trump surrogate. Giuliani claimed that Clinton "acted intentionally and with criminal intent" when deleting 33,000 emails in the previous months. He also states that the software which Clinton erased the emails is used by criminals who are trying to hide evidence. Giuliani released his statements after the FBI released their documents from the interview with Hillary Clinton about her private email servers and emails, in which Giuliani states "make it abundantly clear that she was not only extremely careless in her handling of top secret and confidential government information, but
acted intentionally and with criminal intent..." Giuliani also states that "Clinton was unfit to serve as commander in chief, using the example that she said she thought the "C" marking on emails was referring to paragraphs marked in alphabetical order, rather than classified information." The article then goes on to discuss the different conclusions to which we can come up with from this information; "either she was the dumbest Secretary of State or a bald-faced liar". With these two conclusions at hand, Giuliani asks if we should trust Clinton with nuclear launch codes or if she should be treated just as Martha Stewart was when she made a false statement to the FBI. Issues from this article pertaining to U.S. Government and Politics and the U.S. Constitution are that this is about Hillary Clinton, who is running for President of the United States. This article brings up problems that some U.S. citizens may have with a person who could be in charge of our country in the near future. This article was very con Hillary Clinton and pro Donald Trump. Although never directly stating that she was pro Trump, Morin wrote what a Trump surrogate had stated about Clinton topics, making the article biased. The article did make one point that stuck out to me, which was the reference to Martha Stewart. If all men and women are equal, why was Martha Stewart penalized but Hillary Clinton was not?
acted intentionally and with criminal intent..." Giuliani also states that "Clinton was unfit to serve as commander in chief, using the example that she said she thought the "C" marking on emails was referring to paragraphs marked in alphabetical order, rather than classified information." The article then goes on to discuss the different conclusions to which we can come up with from this information; "either she was the dumbest Secretary of State or a bald-faced liar". With these two conclusions at hand, Giuliani asks if we should trust Clinton with nuclear launch codes or if she should be treated just as Martha Stewart was when she made a false statement to the FBI. Issues from this article pertaining to U.S. Government and Politics and the U.S. Constitution are that this is about Hillary Clinton, who is running for President of the United States. This article brings up problems that some U.S. citizens may have with a person who could be in charge of our country in the near future. This article was very con Hillary Clinton and pro Donald Trump. Although never directly stating that she was pro Trump, Morin wrote what a Trump surrogate had stated about Clinton topics, making the article biased. The article did make one point that stuck out to me, which was the reference to Martha Stewart. If all men and women are equal, why was Martha Stewart penalized but Hillary Clinton was not?