Hillary Clinton Incident Analysis

After all the real evidenced information about the incident, even Obama still makes a cheap reason and supports her (Detrow, 2016). In this email incident, Hillary Clinton used her family’s private email account to get contact with the official State Department while disusing the official email account for federal servers such as Clinton. This official communication included thousands of emails that could be marked classified from the State Department (Moe, 2015). In this controversy, the media, specifically the ones in the “Clinton`s side” took up only the positive reactions about this incident. This should not happen for as citizens are the ones who choose or vote for a president. Both the incident itself and how the media reacted should not have happened. There are three reasons for this, because of Clinton’s actions it could affect citizens, broad media taking up only one side of a story and famous people who are supporting Clinton are not looking at what she had done.

Clinton’s action had affected the citizens in a negative way. Particularly the U.S. citizens who need to vote
To give an example such as CNN, which obviously supports Clinton’s groundless excuse once the incident was revealed by the FBI. She stated it is totally fine if the information is controlled properly and that the government has all the responsibility. Also, the article that stated about this incident’s title was, “Hillary Clinton’s email controversy, explained.” They took what Clinton explained and made a reason about this incident and put it directly to the article. The mentioned media did not include the real facts or the effects about this incident. For example, the media did not include the fact that 125 emails were officially classified out of 7,000 emails released by the state department (Bradner, 2016). These numbers in certain shows an exact fact that the media did not