Preview

Hiroshima Persuasive Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
490 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hiroshima Persuasive Essay
Hiroshima is a heart-wrenching, eye opening book. This book spent less time concentrating on the historical aspects of the atomic bomb, and instead focused on the devastation that the bomb invoked upon Hiroshima, and its citizens. Hiroshima really worked to explain the havoc that the atomic bomb caused to the people that lived in the city, and how the effects of the bomb lingered for years after the war was over. Hiroshima followed the lives of six individuals, explained all the destruction that they witnessed and depicted their reactions to the hardships they had to endure.

A majority of citizens in Japan did not give a lot of thought into whether or not the bomb was ethical. The citizens were, understandably, preoccupied attempting to discern the catastrophe that had transpired in their beloved city. Most of the citizens were “too busy or too weary or too badly hurt to care that they were the objects of the first great experiment in the use of atomic power” (49). The citizens directed their efforts on rebuilding the city, “statisticians began to say that at least a hundred thousand people had lost their lives in the bombing” and there were “sixty-two thousand out
…show more content…
A few days after the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, Tenno, their Emperor, did a radio broadcast to the city of Hiroshima. Tenno doing this was seen as a selfless act in the eyes of the citizens, but it’s possible it was just a precaution that sought to keep the citizens loyal to Japan. When the citizens, “came to know the war ended- that is, Japan was defeated, they, of course, were deeply disappointed, but followed after their Emperor’s commandment in calm spirit, making whole-hearted sacrifice for the everlasting peace of the world- and Japan started her new way” (65). The citizens were extremely loyal to their Emperor, and it was inevitable that they would solely blame the Americans for the chaos that fell upon

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    President Truman was justified in using atomic weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August of 1945. As commander-in Chief of US Armed forces, President Truman was responsible for the men and women in harms way. Americans and Japanese were dying, suffering life-altering injuries and experiencing torture and deprivation in prison camps each day the war raged. Additionally, it is important to look at the cultural elements of Japan, , the possible invasion of Japan, and the American morale during this time, when addressing the justification of Truman's decision.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman’s fallacious military decision to drop the atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima turned out to be pure butchery of the Japanese citizens. The force and power behind this vicious bomb brutally murdered thousands and injured millions of these innocent Japanese women and children. Dr. Oppenheimer believed that the visual effect of an atomic bombing would be tremendous. He estimated the bombing to rise to “a height of 10,000 to 20,000 feet” (Oppenheimer) and that the neutron effect of the explosion to be dangerous to life for a radius of at least two-thirds of a mile. The explosive murdered millions of people because of its terrible impact.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some say that the use of the atomic bomb was inhumane because of the devastation upon human life. While others say that if the atomic bomb had not been used in the manner it was, that World War II may have continued costing more loss of human life than the bombing (The National Interest, n.d.). America was very strong in the act to defend the country and its citizens, dealing with the moral dilemmas behind the bombing, the mass destruction caused by the bombing, the horrible physical and emotional effects on the citizens of Japan, and strained relations between America and…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of the soldiers were ready to die at any moment as long as they take out as many Americans as possible. The fighting style of the Japanese was deadly for American soldiers and the way fight on the battle proved to America that the Japanese would not give up on their country. Japanese men the were going into war knew that they were most likely not returning to their families at home, so they risked it all for their country. The fact that the Japanese would not surrender means that the United States would have to fight as long as the Japanese were willing to fight and that would have caused more American deaths than needed. The atomic bomb was the best solution to get the Japanese to surrender without having caused so many American deaths and the bomb did its job and pushed Japan to surrender.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am writing this letter to you to discuss my concerns on why I feel you should not drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. First off let me start by saying that if you decide to proceed with the dropping of this atomic bomb you will be killing hundreds and thousands of innocent people. I am not sure if you understand the severity of dropping this bomb and the amount of people you will be killing and/or injuring severely. I would like for you to take the time to step back to look at this situation from all angles. What if Japan had decided to drop an Atomic Bomb on the United States. How will that make you feel knowing that your close family and friends can or will be killed because of a disagreement? I am aware…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As barbaric as the atomic bomb was, the opposing argument would point out that “the face of war is the face of death...the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki put an end to the Japanese war” (Document 3). It’s true that death is inevitable during war time, but over one hundred thousand Japanese deaths is excessive, especially when many were civilian deaths. Although the atomic bomb did bring an end to the war in the Pacific, “the Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender” (Document 2). The bombing was unnecessary, and an excessive use of…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1947, the United States was put in a difficult position. While the Japanese emperor did not want to lose his position, or lose honor, they could either fight until the last man stands or find another way. With the creation of an atomic bomb becoming more and more feasible, with the help of Mr. Einstein, it seemed like a great idea. But, there were many things they didn’t think about when they jumped to the idea of dropping the bomb; some were Japan’s surrender and the future of the civilians. The bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was not necessary.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, killing thousands of innocent people! The United States did it to force Japan to surrender and end World War II. To this present day it still and will remain a controversy whether or not the US was in the right or wrong of bombing Hiroshima. I argue that the US shouldn’t have attacked Hiroshima the way they did.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “We are in possession of the most destructive explosive ever devised by man” stated Leaflet B dropped on August 6th, 1945. Since the United States knew how destructive the bomb was, they should have not used it in the first place. Not only was japan in danger but Leo Szilard and 69 co-signers at the Manhattan Project stated “ the cities of the United States as well as the cities of other nations will be in continuous danger of sudden annihilation.” Most people working on the project for two and a half years did not even know what they were working on or hiding from the American public. Though, Japan killed and injured many Americans, the U.S. killed more people and left Japan with high levels of radiation for many years after the bomb was dropped. In conclusion, the United States was not in any way justified for the decision of dropping the atomic…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the summer of 1945, the United States ravaged the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki with newly developed, top secret atomic bombs. In the many years following this event, arguments have transpired as to whether this action was ethical, and whether it was really necessary to end World War II quickly. However, due to the wartime situation and Japan’s extreme cruelty, the United States were predominantly justified in their decision to drop the atomic bombs. Dropping the atomic bombs in Japan was a strategic method to finish the Second World War, and to avenge the Japanese with minimal casualties.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most controversial issues of World War II is the debate on whether or not the United States should have used an atomic bomb against the Japanese. People who tend to oppose the use of the atomic bomb tend to ignore, or are ignorant, of the history of Japan during World War II. One factor to consider is the treatment of prisoners of war and civilians in countries that Japan had conquered. Another aspect was the “never surrender” mentality of the Japanese military in the territories they controlled during World War II. The final point is the estimated number of casualties for both sides. Due to these factors, the U.S. should have dropped the bomb on Japan to save lives on both sides.…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    "It's too bad that there were so many casualties, but if you tell me how to fight a war without killing people, then I'm going to be the happiest man in the world," said Theodore "Dutch" Van Kirk, the last living crew member that dropped the bomb on Hiroshima. The U.S. dropped two bombs, on Hiroshima, and later Nagasaki three days later. The bombs were built under the project code-named “The Manhattan Project,” named after the place they were constructed, Manhattan, New York. And an estimated total of 225,000 people was killed or wounded on account of the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Hiroshima and Nagasaki Death Toll). While dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was terrible, it was not wrong for the United States because an invasion of Japan…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The use of the atomic bomb remains controversial to this day. There are academics and policy makers of the time that still disagree on the whether it was justifiable to destroy Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They debate if it truly was in the interest of ending the war sooner and with less loss of life. Several issues played together to help form the opinion that Truman acted for more nefarious purposes. Domestic as well as international politics is said to have played a role in the decision of Truman to go ahead with the use of the atomic bomb . Would the Japanese have been willing to surrender without the dropping of the bomb? Some experts believe that because Japanese representatives were talking to the Russians about being…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the August of 1945, America dropped an atom bomb on Hiroshima. The ethical debate on this topic may never be resolved, but one cannot possibly deny the negative effects.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays