The U.S. Went through all the pros and cons of dropping the bomb some of the negatives were the effects that i would have on the people. The Atomic bomb was dropped on two civilian cities in japan which when detonated it killed many of the civilians within the city, destroying all the buildings in its path. After the destruction caused by the atomic bomb ceased the after effects consisted of toxic rain and radiation, this caused many deaths in itself that still show some effects even today. Radiation traces can still be found today in these areas effected by the bombs.
Even though the bomb killed many inocent civilians were killed, I believe that it was necessary because with out the dropping the war would have gone on, and more lives would have been taken on both sides. The Japanese had no means to stop in the war but the dropping of the bomb showed that the US had no means to stand down either and we would take the actions necessary to protect ourselves and make sure that the Germans and Japanese made no advances. I believe it was necessary.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…
- 186 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
If the war continued, an invasion would be needed and such an invasion “… would have cost an estimated million casualties,” (The Decision to Drop the Bomb). It was even believed by President Truman “… that the bombs saved Japanese lives as well,” (The Decision to Drop the Bomb). Even though the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths, the quick end to the war they brought saved more lives in the long run than those that were lost in the…
- 658 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This war did not seem like there would ever be an end until the US decided to unleash their new weapon of mass destruction, the atomic bomb. I feel that the bomb was unnecessary and unjustifiable for a variety of reasons. One reason was the amount of innocent citizens killed or injured due to the bomb. The bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki which were two highly populated areas at the time.…
- 677 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I don't think that the US should have bombed Japan. It was entirely unnecessary and the US had plenty of opportunities to do other things. America could have used a technical demonstration to show how powerful the bombs were on a nearby, but uninhabited, island. This would have been a effective intimidation act while not adding to WWII's already enormous death count. Admittedly this alone would not have ensured Japan's surrender, but Japan was planning on surrendering in the fall off 1945. The only thing that was keeping them from surrendering sooner was their unwillingness to accept completely unconditional surrender. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have ended World War II, but was it worth the lives…
- 119 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The bomb caused great destruction to thousands of innocent lives. The bomb created a whole other problem, that could’ve been substituted with another weapon, that not as deadly. Bombs came with pros and cons, the bombs meant for people and those who have nothing to do with any incident. Overall the bombs were pure cruel.…
- 194 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The dropping of the Atomic Bomb was an attack made on the Japanese by the Americans. Although the dropping of the Atomic Bomb by the United States helped to end World War II, the act was unjustified because of innocent Japanese civilians that were needlessly murdered and were not given sufficient time to surrender from the area. Consequently, the Japanese were defeated before and they were attempting to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the unsuccessful bombing with conventional weapons. This would be the reason that the bombing was not useful.…
- 635 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The atomic bomb was a very good strategic move. The US was able to wipe out a large area of Hiroshima instantly, without killing any of their own men. In addition, they knew that if they used the bomb, they could end the war. On August 15th, Japan announced their surrender after being bombed just weeks beforehand.…
- 578 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The only military use of atomic weapons has been on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and almost certainly brought a prompt conclusion to WW2. However, the question of whether it was necessary is still hotly debated 70 years after the event. The answer is no it wasn’t necessary, although it is not as simple as you may think because if I had just been a soldier fighting in New Guinea or if I was a POW starving on the Thai-Burma railway [1] then answer is yes it was necessary. Necessary can have various meanings though such as indispensable or requisite, but also mean acting from need. The question becomes very problematic or ambiguous if one uses both meanings as again we get a yes and no.…
- 969 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The atomic bomb was necessary in order to assure the war would end as soon as possible. On August 6th the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, on august 9th a second one was dropped on Nagasaki, and on August 10th Japan declared its intention to surrender. This is clear proof that atomic bomb was an effective way to end the war. Even if it did kill many people it might actually have killed less people then if we had kept the war going for much longer.…
- 833 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
According to The United States war crimes, killing civilians during war is a serious offense, the US did exactly that when it bombed Hiroshima in 1945. The tactic that America took to end the war resulted in the deaths of nearly 146,000 people; this was unacceptable because the citizens of Hiroshima were unarmed and were not part of the police force. This act was not a reasonable resolution to the war, it was a genocide that occurred because of a poor decision. Killing civilians during war is a serious violation (The United States war crimes). The bombing of Hiroshima was an unreasonable act that took the lives of thousands of innocent people, the majority being civilians.…
- 310 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
On August 6, President Harry Truman plans to drop an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. This bomb is supposed to have a major impact on this city. Tens of thousands of people are estimated to die on impact, and thousands are estimated to die after due to the exposure to radiation. President Truman wants to drop the bomb to end the six year war, however, it has caused a major controversy over the amount of damage it will cause. Some people believe that this amount of destruction is needed to assure the war ends. They believe that Japan is going to attack the United States soon, and because the USA is low on resources, they are more vulnerable for the attack. Others think that we should drop the bomb, Little Man, in a nearby harbor to scare the Japanese. They also think that the atomic bomb is too extreme. The blast of the bomb is supposed to be…
- 376 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
What would you do if you were a soldier, and you knew that if your country didn’t drop the atomic bomb, then you would die? This is what many soldiers were thinking about on August 6th, 1945 when the American government decided to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. By doing this they saved millions of American lives. When they did this Japan surrendered and it won us the war. Also, it demonstrated the power of America. America did the right thing by dropping the atomic bomb.…
- 807 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
President Truman authorized atomic bombs to be dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945. The two bombings killed at least 129,000 INNOCENT civilians. During the following months, more people died from the effect of burns, radiation sickness and other injuries. Six days after the Nagasaki bombing Japan surrendered and World War II ended.…
- 374 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The atomic bomb is a bomb that rapidly releases energy causing destructive damage through heat. The atomic bomb dropped on Japan was not needed it was an evil act and was unnecessary. It was undoubtedly not required to drop a 4-ton barbaric weapon that is equivalent to 5 million dollars on another country. The United States Military had already launched a sea blockade that consisted of a submarine campaign before the bomb was dropped. It was cutting food and supplies. Not only was it already beaten by seas. There was a massive amount of air attacks; the United States already had control of the Japanese air space before the atomic bomb. With Majority control of Japans airs the United States conducted many raids on Japan causing extensive destruction by dropping over tens of thousands pounds of bombs. This had already caused massive destruction to towns and cities. It was a race towards who could have the first atomic bomb. When The United States Successfully accomplished the bomb it was at first a way to initiate Japan into Surrendering but the second bomb was a way to show superiority towards the rest of the world that America is very powerful. The alternative is what could have happened if the bomb was not used? Japan was already getting dominated by sea and by air they were being isolated and not allowed resources it was only a matter of time till Japan could have surrendered. If the bombs were not used there would not be near as many deaths and utter destruction. But we cannot no for sure if Japan could have surrendered or not, and if they did not surrender what could have been lost? Many American troops would have lost their lives. But instead of a civilian loss it could have been a military loss. Japan was already dominated by the United States they were running out of resources and did not have long until rioting would have started the United States was a huge problem for Japan. They were surrounded. The only…
- 1436 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Japanese had at that time, already lost quite a lot of battles against the US and were forced to retreat back to Japan. Yet, the Japanese borders were heavily fortified. Had the Americans attacked Japan, they estimated their losses to be about 500 000 men. By dropping the atomic bomb, an estimated number of 100 000 people died. So in the end you can see that dropping the atomic bomb has saved quite a lot of lives in a way. America had bombed Tokyo before, using conventional bombs. While in Hiroshima using the atomic bomb, about 75000 people died, and in Nagasaki about 50000, during the conventional bombing of Tokyo, 100,000 people had died. This makes the atomic bombs seem a little bit less powerless because we can see that conventional bombs can kill just as many people.…
- 448 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays