Preview

Hitler's Foreign Policy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
621 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hitler's Foreign Policy
Hitler’s foreign policy was very aggressive, it included that the Treaty Of Versailles should be demolished, That all German speaking countries should be united (Pangermanism), Germany should increase its borders (Lebesnraum), Communism was to be made illegal and these are only a few examples from his policy. Firstly, Hitler broke the Treaty Of Versailles as he stopped paying reparations, another example of when Hitler broke the Treaty is when he remilitarised the Rhineland. The remilitarisation was strictly forbidden in the Treaty but when Hitler did it, Britain said his actions were justified. The Treaty also read the Hitler could not join with Austria, because Italy, France & Britain feared a larger, more powerful Germany. March 9th 1938, Hitler sent his armies into Austria, to restore ‘Law & Order’. The Austrian people welcomed his troops. After his troops were successfully inside Austria, he called for a an Anschluss which was probably rigged. Austrian people voted 99% in favour of uniting with Germany. As well as breaking the Treaty the unification was also an example of Lebesnraum & Pangermanism. This policy was aggressive and the British Prime Minister at the time, Chamberlain, did not challenge this infact he appeased Hitler to please him and hope that he would not attack Britain, this only made Hitler more confident. In the end Chamberlain saw that his policy was failing after Hitler ignored the Munich conference and invaded all of Czechoslovakia. So Chamberlain realised Hitler could not be appeased and he saw that Poland would be the next target of the Nazis, so he promised the Polish government that if Hitler invaded Poland that Britain and France would support Poland. In 1939 Hitler did invade Poland and Britain declared war on Germany, starting the Second World War.

Britain and France’s Policy Of Appeasement

Appeasement was a new idea in Europe, it was a theory that aggressive dictators could be appeased by giving them a little bit of what

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The erosion of Neville Chamberlain’s# reputation was brought about quickly as his policy of appeasement failed to prevent WW2. The Cato# collective branded him as a criminal in the ‘Guilty men’#. Churchill# further reinforced this view telling the commons “England has been offered a choice between war and shame. She has chosen shame, and will get war.”#. These more orthodox views starkly contrast the reactions of the public and media pre-war. Hailed as a hero “Most newspapers supported Chamberlain uncritically, and he received thousands of gifts, from a silver dinner service to many of his trademark umbrellas.”#, with newspapers such as the Stockholm Tidningen# suggesting he receive the Nobel peace prize, Strasbourg renaming her streets overnight and the Telegram# concluding "Your name will go down in history as a statesman who saved civilisation from destruction”#. Ultimately appeasement, “the reduction of tensions between two states by the methodical removal of the principal causes of conflict and disagreement between them, which might otherwise lead to war.”# may not have been the only realistic option, but it was certainly an option and it was taken forward. Used as a synonym for weakness and ‘giving in’ in today’s world, there are Historians who argue that Chamberlain and his policy of appeasement was weak and lead to WW2 such as L.B. Namier, while there are also historians, such as A.J.P Taylor, who argue it was the only realistic option for him, during the years 1936-38.…

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II DBQ

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the early 1920s, as World War I ended, nations looked for peace as an outlet and hope for the future. As time passed, most countries were happy that the Great War had ended, however they were upset with the outcome. Since there were many costly expenses from the war, it caused many of the hostile nations to look for strong rulers for change. This allowed many harsh dictators to rise to power. These dictators were aggressive rulers and took forceful actions. In order to combat these aggressive rulers, other nations tried to resist war and give in to their demands. This type of action was known as appeasement. Not all countries felt the same way about this response; other countries believed that a collective security would work better.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    France and UK came up with the policy of appeasement which was a policy with nazi germany that would allow hitler to take a lot more land than he was supposed to. The reason being is the policy was put into place so that the UK and france would let Hitler do what he wanted as long as he didnt do what they told him not to do. The policy of appeasement however did not work because Hitler was not someone you could appease. Once Hitler invaded poland the policy ended thus ending the reign of letting hitler walk all over…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. This statement is quite accurate in many ways. This time in history, where Hitler was gaining power he could be related to a child. The reasons he can be consider a child, because he is like a kid who is pushing his limits. Great Britain's and France's appeasement only makes it worse. When a child breaks a rule and they are punished to keep them from doing it again. With Hitler, he kept breaking treaties and known one would do anything, so he kept pushing his limits. Eventually someone decides to do something and it was too late and Hitler had rebuilt German. A main example to this statement is when Hitler declares that Germany will not follow the treaty of Versailles. He then begins to build up Germany’s army again with no one trying to stop him.(p.860). Hitler continued these types of actions all the way up to World War 2.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    World War Ii and Hitler

    • 8150 Words
    • 33 Pages

    - Appeasement Wordsearch - Appeasement Acrosstick - Appeasement Acrosstick (differentiated) Section 5 Failure of the League of Nations Page 31,32 Page 33,34 Page 35 Page 36,37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 - Information Pages…

    • 8150 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    War on the Western Front

    • 9546 Words
    • 39 Pages

    Prime objective of Hitler was to reverse provisions of the Treaty of Versailles; similarly, Mussolini felt Italy had been betrayed by Britain and France and were owed land (1935, Germany began re-armament and brought army up to 500 000, 1936, re-militarisation of the Rhineland)…

    • 9546 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    France wanted action to enforce the treaty. They thought that if there was a single soldier in the demilitarized zone then they should use pressure to force Germany into submission.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    1.Explain the process of Cellular Respiration in order. Where does each step occur in a cell, which steps require oxygen, and how many ATP are produced in each step?…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Causes of World War II

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the short term causes of World War two was Hitler’s actions. Hitler started building up his army and air force merely days after being appointed leader in 1933. He had to do this in secret as rearmament was forbidden by the Treaty of Versailles. Hitler also defied the Treaty again and made his first aggressive move by sending troops to reoccupy the Rhineland; the Treaty of Versailles had ordered Germany to demilitarize the Rhineland as a punishment. Hitler justified his actions by claiming that German territory should be protected by German troops. Hitler also wanted to unite Austria and Germany. This was also forbidden by the Treaty of Versailles. He sent troops into Austria and forced the Austrian leader to hold a vote to see if the Austrian people wanted to join forces with Germany. Hitler made sure the vote was rigged so that over 99% of the Austrian people voted for unification. Hitler then demanded that the Sudetenland region of Czechlovakia join Germany. He stated that most of the people living in this region were German and therefore wanted them to unite with Germany and the rest of Czechlovakia was invaded shortly afterwards. Hitler and Stalin then signed a non-aggression pact called the Nazi-Soviet pact. They agreed not to fight each other and to divide up Poland between them. This meant that Hitler would not have to fight a war on two fronts. Hitler demasnded back the parts of Poland that had been taken away from Germany. By the Treaty of Versailles, Poland refused and on 1st September 1939 Hitler invaded Poland. This…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Berlin Wall Was a wall ordered to be erected in July of 1961 by Walter Ulbricht. It was built to separate the USSR controlled East Germany and the modern West Germany which was shared by France, Britain and the United States of America. It served it’s purpose and kept millions of East Germans trapped on their side of the country. The presence of the Berlin Wall changed Europe and ended the Soviet Dream of communism. The wall fell as quickly as it was built in November of 1989.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cause Of Ww2 Essay

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Some of the causes of ww2 is Italian fascism in 1920 Japanese militarism and invasions of china in 1930 and especially the political takeover in 1933 of Germany by Hitler and its aggressive foreign policy. On 6 October Hitler made a public peace overture to the United Kingdom and France, but said that the future of Poland was to be determined exclusively by Germany and the Soviet Union. Chamberlain rejected this on 12 October, saying "Past experience has shown that no reliance can be placed upon the promises of the present German…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler's Actions After Ww2

    • 2412 Words
    • 10 Pages

    When studying 20th century German history, we usually tend to focus on the horrific acts committed by the Nazi’s, and our opinions on the subject are primarily dictated by internal sentimental reactions to those actions. This easily leads us to group and assume all of of Germany in support of Hitler during that time period. Such a notion becomes extremely problematic if trying to objectively examine individual histories during this time, especially pertaining to the average German. I would like to propose a more nuanced way of examining average Germans during this time. One that separates and analyzes them separately, by taking a step back from our emotions and surveying them as individuals outside of the scope of Hitler’s actions. To start, let us look at the ideas that this essay will explore in an attempt to humanize and present an alterative narrative about lower and working-class Germans.…

    • 2412 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler's Propaganda

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During World War II, Adolf Hitler exterminated over 6 million people of Jewish origin and others who were a threat to the Aryan race and the Nazi Party. The Webster Dictionary describes a Jewish person as part of a group of people who trace their descent from the Israelites of the Bible or descendants of adherents of Judaism (Jew, n.d.). Jewish people as a whole had not broken the laws or done anything wrong to deserve their mistreatment yet “to Hitler, and to many who carried out his orders, these people had been criminals since before birth. They were Jews” (Arnold 11). In the eyes of the Nazi Party, globally, the Jews were to blame for the downfall of Germany. Hitler claimed publicly, that he wished to purge Jews from the entire European…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler wanted to expand the German land for economic means and used the Treaty of Versailles as an excuse to invade Poland. Hitler demanded more out of the French and British Governments, and they decided to give a small portion of Czechoslovakia; Hitler wasn’t satisfied; he invaded the whole of Czechoslovakia in 1939. The French and British Governments at the time didn’t want a repeat of World War I and had an intention of appeasing Hitler to stop further…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From Your Knowledge and the Sources, How Far do you agree With the View That Hitler Consolidated His Power by Legal Means?…

    • 1243 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics