Preview

Hobbes and Machiavelli

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
276 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hobbes and Machiavelli
Write an essay of no more than 2750 words on the following topic. Be sure to cite passages generously from the texts of Machiavelli and Hobbes (in quotation marks, of course). Since we’re all using the same translations of Machiavelli, you should cite by page number; since we have discussed Hobbes with reference to chapter and section number, you should cite this way: L 18.2.

You should not do any secondary reading for this paper. Your work should be based on your own thinking, your own reading of the assigned texts, and your own comprehension of the class lectures.

The paper is due March 22nd.

Write on the following topic:

Based on the readings assigned this term, compare and contrast Machiavelli and Hobbes with regard to the purpose or end or goal of government and the form it should take. With regard to the purpose or end or goal of government, you should consider each thinker’s view of political motivation, paying particular attention to glory, peace, stability, and material advantage. With regard to the form of government, you should examine what each thinker makes of the relationship between the political leader(s), or the sovereign representative, on the one hand, and “the people,” or those who are represented, on the other. Be sure to consider ways in which the two thinkers give similar and different accounts of political phenomena. As with the first two papers, craft a well-structured discussion, with a clear thesis statement and with effective use of textual quotations and references. For the Machiavelli portion of your essay, you must cite passages from both The Prince and The Discourses on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Number the questions as they appear on this sheet or copy (retype) the questions. Type your answers in paragraph format, single-spaced and use quotations and examples from the book in support of your answers. Please indicate page numbers for quotations and proofread and spell-check your paper. PLEASE DO NOT RETYPE THE BOOK. I’m interested in reading your perception and perspective on the book.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The objective of this assignment is to further introduce us to the some of the themes of the course and to start collecting basic information. Please be sure to take your time with the answers and support your conclusions. To receive full credit, please cite your sources where appropriate (this will help you later on).…

    • 277 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When comparing Hobbes,’ Sandel’s and Machiavelli’s viewpoints regarding which of Aristotle’s three main categories of knowledge is the most significant for establishing good political systems or making good political decisions, one must consider what each theorists considers to be a good political system and create a link between the two. The most important category of knowledge for establishing and making good political systems for Aristotle is practical knowledge, the purpose of politics is to produce good, virtuous citizens, the law promotes just actions, purpose of legislators is to establish good laws. The most important category of knowledge for Hobbes is scientific knowledge, the absolute sovereign represents the commonwealth of its citizens, the absolute sovereign must uphold their self preservation, and all laws…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The understanding of human nature and the effects it has on the individual and society has been a serious topic in the philosophical world. Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were well known for their crucial roles in forming the foundation of political philosophy. While reading through Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan, both introduced a common focus on political theory even though living approximately 100 years apart. While learning about these two philosophers and their proposed theories, I noticed an innate relationship in the discussion of society’s human nature. Machiavelli ([1532] 2006) in The Prince theorizes the qualities that a dominant leader should have to gain and maintain power.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher of the 1600’s that tried to create a basis for politics. Having experienced the English civil war, Hobbes realized that the conflict was the result of human nature. Hobbes exclaimed that the world was full of greedy people and those who are selfless and care only for themselves. Without the government to maintain order, Hobbes said that there would be “a condition of war of everyone against everyone”. Hobbes noted that in order to stop this, the people would have to sacrifice their freedom for the government. In exchange, they gained law and order. He also notes that this sacrifice would allow the government to suppress any form of rebellion. Hobbes called this agreement the social contract.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    english writing paper

    • 2001 Words
    • 8 Pages

    I declare that I have no prior knowledge of the questions in this assessment and that I will not divulge to any person information about the questions.…

    • 2001 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes Vs Machiavelli

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page

    Lastly, both Hobbes and Machiavelli agree in their opinion of man what is one that is very negative. In the novel The Prince, Machiavelli states that men are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive, and deceiving, avoiders of danger, eager to gain” (Machiavelli < 1542 > 2006). Similarly, in the novel Leviathan, Hobbes states how the life of a man is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (Hobbes < 1651 > 2009). This shows how both Machiavelli and Hobbes see men and their lives as very negative aspects, but differ in what there perspectives are of it. Machiavelli explains how men are unreliable and not worth trusting when Hobbes is explaining how life naturally is terrible and without sovereignty, life and man are nothing.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    CYP Core 3.3

    • 2388 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The points that were in the introduction have been discusses as well as being expanded on. There have been references throughout from both books and online to support the points that were made in this assignment.…

    • 2388 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    This an essay based on this week’s assignment answering two question and quoting three main points from page 94.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli V.S. Hobbes

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When reading Machiavelli’s ‘The Prince’ to anyone who is not a king his ideas would sound horrible, but what most people don’t know is that his ideas are everywhere in modern day society and most people agree with those ideas without even knowing that they do. Whether it’s history, presidential debates, or pop culture, Machiavelli’s words have lead to inspire many where as Hobbes hasn’t received as much acknowledgement and acceptance for his views. If you’d ask a group of people if they believe in the saying “It doesn’t matter where you’ve been, only where you going” or “It’s all about what you’re doing, it doesn’t matter what you’ve done” most people would agree with it, without knowing that is exactly what Machiavelli is trying to express in his book ‘The Prince.’…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many intellectual influences also shaped Hobbes’ ideas and philosophies. He collected ideas from classic works, and Calvinist psychology. He derived political philosophy that man want to possess things and human society is not naturally a collection of individuals who live together bound by the rules. He drew aspects from the scientific revolution such as Euclid’s method of deduction, the law of inertia, and many of Galileo’s discoveries. He was focused on arriving at self evident truths. Similarly to Machiavelli, Hobbes’ works are filled with ideas influenced by the violence that he witnessed in his lifetime.…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    [ 2 ]. Lawrence F. Hundersmarck, "Niccolo Machiavelli. Great Thinkers of the Western World. HarperCollins Publishers, 1999,”…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosopher Thomas Hobbes argued that government was best if it was autocratic, an all-powerful sovereign. To understand Hobbes’s reasoning, it is crucial to first understand his view on man’s conditions in an anarchic environment. In Hobbes’ perspective, man’s life in the state of nature was “solid, poor, brutish, and short” because man is selfish and violent. Without institutions to provide security, man was always in a constant state of war. These anarchic conditions compel men to look after their own self-interest causing many problems to arise. Hobbes advocated for a monarchic government on the domestic state level because a society needed a central authority with sufficient power to provide rules for government and security. On the international level, Hobbes believed that the system was best when governed by one country.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HIS 105 Assignment 2

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For the next part of this assignment you will create an outline of the main points you want to address in this paper. This will sewe as the basis for your Assignment 2.2 Final Draft. (Note: Please use the Purdue Owl Website to assist you with this assignment; this website can be accessed at: https://owLen Fg_~h.purdue.edu/enfl&c~ementJ2/2/55!…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Understanding of goodness of Philosopher Kings and Machiavelli’s Prince citizens and their characters and also essay question asks about two distinctive types of rulers so comparison of the two sides in terms of types of rule. Two different views exist between Plato and Machiavelli, both having different ideas on virtues, structure of government, and role of populace.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays