Preview

Hobbes State Of Nature Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1022 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hobbes State Of Nature Analysis
Reading Question 1: Explain what Hobbes description of the state of nature is supposed to show and why.
Hobbes description of the state of nature is supposed to show that society can have a life without government, rules, or a ruler. That everyone in a society is roughly equal and no matter how strong a person may be, they can be killed by another person or a group of people (Rader, n.d.). During his time, kings and other ruling classes were above the rest of society. This got Hobbes thinking of what really justifies the existence of the king or government? He started out by imagening a world without a government or king ruling. This thinking got Hobbes in a place where everyone could have the right to everything; a full liberty for every
…show more content…
The Enlightenment is known for its political accomplishments and being known as “the age of reason” (Rader, n.d.). The Enlightenment was found to re-make the social/political world, to the true models that are found in our reason (Rader, n.d.). Prior to the Enlightenment, religion and morality were seen in the law as the same. During this time, as society, people were expected to practice the religion. In fact, people could be put to death for not following the religion but for following what they believe. These people were in union with God and the afterlife. However, during the Enlightenment people saw protestent reformation. Protestent reformation is the freedom of conscience. During this time, as a society, they were expected to follow the rules. The only way to be punished was by breaking the law, not for what you believe. The people saw happiness in the world they lived in. Happiness wasn’t only found in the afterlife. Many philosophers, such as Isaac Newton, found that social and political authority is centered souly around tradition. They said that beliefs should be justified by rational or scientific basis (Rader, n.d.). Humans have individual rights and freedoms and should be seen as politically. Understanding this way and how society should be of the natural world was problematic but not impossible. Afterall, the Enlightenment is still happening

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After analyzing how Locke and Hobbes understand the state of nature it is evident that they share many ideas but they also show essential differences in their ideas. Hobbes regards the state of nature as a state of war, in which natural law is established only after a process of reasoning. This process leads men to the conclusion that they must somehow find…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Enlightenment was a reaction against the current political and social frameworks in Europe. The enlightenment attempted to suggest the standards of sound judgment and motivation to the workings of ordinary life and in government while questioning humankind in society. It dismissed the celestial privileges of rulers even though it was not as much as an arrangement of thoughts as it was an arrangement of states of mind. At its center was feedback, a scrutinizing of conventional foundations, traditions, and ethics. Enlightenment philosophers, including Voltaire, David Hume, and John Locke each contributed, liberty, opposition against established religion and tabula rasa to western society.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beginning in the 1740's, the enlightenment was a reforming of religion. People started thinking differently about their religion. Prior to the enlightenment it was believed that everything that happened was because god wanted it to happen. However, after a series of events in Europe it started to become known that perhaps god didn't control our lives directly. This led to John Locke essay concerning human understanding which led many to embrace reasonable or rational religion.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper, I will analyze both Hobbes’ and Rousseau’s view on the Nature of Man. Through my analysis of both, I will show contrast and comparison between both philosophical views. I will identify and explain the central aspect of the Nature of Man as identified by Hobbes and Rousseau and will make connections through a series of explanations and examples that were presented by Hobbes and Rousseau.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enlightenment thinkers essentially believed in freedom. They believed in freedom of the state from the church, freedom of the people from oppression and the monarchy, and freedom of the politicians to change government when things become corrupt. Revolutions followed through those beliefs and separated church and state by dissolving rights and privelegas, gave the people the power they wanted in the third estate, and continually innovated the government structure in search of something better. Ultimately, the Revolutionaries lived up to their motto “liberty, equality,…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 103 Final

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1D. The state of nature is Hobbes’ description of what human beings lived like prior to the existence of a state or civilized society. In this existence, all humans were equal in that they all wanted to achieve their ultimate end and they all had the right to do what they thought necessary for survival…

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is a brutish and violent nature. In the absence of culture, arts, science, reading or writing, humans, possibly, are more related to animals, since animals also live in the state of nature, and who always fight for domination. This rather negative view is Hobbe’s main reason why there should be a government. There should be an authority to establish peace. In peace, numerous achievements can be obtained. In peace does humanity progress. It might be argued that Hobbes demands a despot, an autocracy. Still, is not that better than the state of nature? There might be many opposing arguments especially that of the anarchists, yet Hobbe’s examples might not be conquered because they are succinct and feasible. They are plausibly impregnable because they are factual, not idealist. Leviathan does convincingly argue, and this monster in the state of nature does devour…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Enlightenment, “a philosophical movement of the 18th century, characterized by belief in the power of human reason and by innovations in political, religious, and educational doctrine “(Webster). “ The Early 1600’s the Western world believed in the undisputed primacy of rulers spiritual and secular. It was believed that our time here on earth is either eternal salvation or damnation “(Schultz). The Enlightenment started in England and it became an issue for others to acquire knowledge in teaching, science, and literature. There were Pastors and Clergymen supported the enlightenment they believed that God us the gift of life which was salvation to everyone. They also believed that everyone should have the choice of life and property…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The enlightenment age was a period in time in which the light was brought to the darkest corners of the mind where the thoughts had always been deeply filled with racism, mythical beliefs, little education, and strong beliefs of a monarchy style government. This era brought on a fresh and brightened light within these darkened corners of the mind where the thoughts and feelings had always been darkened by these dampening laws and thoughts. The enlightenment era is a very special time in the world as we were brought to light a new age in time were the religious beliefs and assumptions of religion are based on a petty cynical belief. We very well may not have been as intelligent or as dominant in the animal kingdom as we are today. This is a…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Enlightenment, also known as the Age of Reason, is the name given to the period in Europe and America during the 1700s when mankind was emerging from centuries of ignorance into a new age enlightened by reason, science, and respect for humanity (Age of Reason). Enlightenment thinkers had an immense influence on the world during the Enlightenment Period because they were able to adapt and change people’s ethics and morals to create a better society. During this time, society was extremely religious and believed anything the church told them to believe. This causes citizens to believe what they were told and never giving them the ability to form and share their own…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes' Leviathan and Locke's Second Treatise of Government comprise critical works in the lexicon of political science theory. Both works expound on the origins and purpose of civil society and government. Hobbes' and Locke's writings center on the definition of the "state of nature" and the best means by which a society develops a systemic format from this beginning. The authors hold opposing views as to how man fits into the state of nature and the means by which a government should be formed and what type of government constitutes the best. This difference arises from different conceptions about human nature and "the state of nature", a condition in which the human race finds itself prior to uniting into civil society. Hobbes' Leviathan goes on to propose a system of power that rests with an absolute or omnipotent sovereign, while Locke, in his Treatise, provides for a government responsible to its citizenry with limitations on the ruler's powers. The understanding of the state of nature is essential to both theorists' discussions. For Hobbes, the state of nature is equivalent to a state of war. Locke's description of the state of nature is more complex: initially the state of nature is one of "peace, goodwill, mutual assistance and preservation". Transgressions against the law of nature, or reason which "teaches mankind that all being equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty and possessions," are but few. The state of nature, according to Locke's Treatise, consists of the society of man, distinct from political society, live together without any superior authority to restrict and judge their actions. It is when man begins to acquire property that the state of nature becomes somewhat less peaceful. At an undetermined point in the history of man, a people, while still in the state of nature, allowed one person to become their leader and judge over controversies. This was first the patriarch of a…

    • 3013 Words
    • 87 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    4. Hobbes viewed human nature as being inherently troubled. He believed that our nature made man continually try to become better than everyone else so that there would be “no other power great enough to endanger him” (pg. 208). Hobbes argued that our human nature keeps us at continual war with one another, particularly when there isn’t a common authority to keep us all in check. Hobbes also believed that two people would become enemies when they desired the same thing, they will aim to destroy the other (pg. 207) in an effort to attain glory.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Natural and inherently known by all because it can be deduced by innate mental faculties (reason, philosophy).…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prior to the Enlightenment, belief in God was widely accepted. Everyday questions were always solved by simply turning to the teachings of religion. Even political problems were solved in a similar manner. Christians consulted the Old Testament numerous times to solve issues of the community. Concepts such as the separation of church and state did not yet exist. This all changed during the Enlightenment. It had a drastic effect on people’s view of the Church and its teachings, so much that it would never be the same again. There are many factors that changed the popular view of religion during the Enlightenment.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the Enlightenment society was centered around the church. The church believed in original sin,this means that when you were born you were born with sin. If you disagreed with the church you could get punished, sometimes life, or even capital punishment . The monarchy used their religion to legitimize their authority. The Catholic Church would use their authority to tell the monarchs what to do, if the monarchs did not do what the church said, they would excommunicate them. If you become excommunicated, you will not be able to receive the sacraments. The purpose is to inspire people to repent and be reconciled. The monarchs also believed in the divine right of kings. The divine right of kings is the belief that you don’t have to tell people what you are doing,you have the right to rule directly from God. People were having a hard life because of the monarch’s decisions. Families were having a…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays