Preview

Hobby Lobby Case Justified

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
276 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hobby Lobby Case Justified
I completely agree with the opinion that the Hobby Lobby case is justified. The new interpretation that religion can also pertain to private corporations due to the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. This allows for Hobby Lobby to deny birth control to employees. However, as many have stated before, the employees’ individual rights to birth control have to be respected as well. Just because the corporation itself does not believe in the birth control, this does not mean the corporation can ignore the workers’ rights to have birth control. Thus, I believe that Hobby Lobby is able to defer birth control payments to the federal government because employees that seek birth control are still able to receive it. However, in recitations,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Appeal and Hobby Lobby

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Appellee met with an accident in appellant’s store when her feet became entangled in plastic strips. Appellee alleged that appellant was negligent and claimed…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobby Lobby. This case centered around a portion of the Affordable Care Act that required employers to cover certain FDA-approved contraceptives. The owners of Hobby Lobby, the Greene family, are devout Christians and felt that they could not do this due to religious freedom. The court ruled that forcing them to cover contraceptives violated their beliefs, and they could not be forced to comply. Justice Alito claimed that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act applied to corporations, and forcing Hobby Lobby to comply was burdening them. Ginsburg replied to this with a 35-page dissent paper and forced it to be delivered to the press. The opening line to her set the tone for the entire paper “[i]n a decision of startling breadth, the Court holds that commercial enterprises, including corporations, along with partnerships and sole proprietorships, can opt out of any law (saving only tax laws) they judge incompatible with their sincerely held religious beliefs.” (Ginsburg…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The appellants argued the decision to approve the resort construction violated their freedom of religion right protected by s. 2(a). Building the resort would drive out the Grizzly Bear Spirit, a spirit central to their beliefs and practices. They argued the Big M Drug Mart definition of the 2(a) right included the belief that freedom of religion had a communal aspect that the state could not…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma and filed a lawsuit. The district court denied Hobby Lobby’s request for a preliminary injunction. In March 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit allowed a hearing of the case. In June the appeals court sided with Hobby Lobby and said that a company had the same rights of a person and could restrict women’s access to contraception on religious grounds. In September the US appealed to the US Supreme Court.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Hobby Lobby is a family owned arts and crafts store that runs on Christian principles. The companies statement of purpose is “honoring the Lord in all [they] do by operating the company in a manner consistent with Biblical principles.” The family does not believe in the use of contraception but under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), the company is required to offer a minimum coverage health care plan that includes forms of contraception. The plaintiffs filed suit to challenge the requirement to provide contraceptive method to their employees under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), the First Amendment (Free Exercise…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court case, Zubik v. Burwll is aimed to answer multiple questions. The first question this case aims to answer is does the availability of a regulatory exemption for religious employers regarding the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate eliminate the substantial burden on those organizations’ exercise of their religious freedom? The second question this case will answer is do the Department of Health and Human Services’ guidelines satisfy the Religious Freedom Restoration Act’s demanding test for overriding religious objections? Last, the third question this court will answer is do the Department of Health and Human Services’ guidelines violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act when the government has not proven that the guidelines…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 2012, a family called the Greens ran Hobby Lobby, which is a craft store. This family are Christians and have strong faith in what they believe in. Being a very religious family, that they believe that giving or promoting contraceptives, will make them seem as if they are going against their own belief (Oyez, 2013). Contraceptives are artificial methods or various techniques to prevent pregnancy due to sexual intercourse, so the Greens family refuse to provide those things to their workers. This is where the Greens family is furious to give these types of protection to their workers, so they sued.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 28, 1971, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed and remanded the Pennsylvania case, ruling that according to the religion clauses included within the First Amendment, the state statute violated the Constitution. The Court proceeded to describe the separate, yet interdependent parts of determining establishment: having a nonreligious purpose, not primarily having an effect on religion, and not closely involving government and religion. The Court also cited Everson v. Board of Education and Walz v. Tax Commission when delivering its opinion.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stutzman Case Summary

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “This case is about crushing dissent. In a free America, people with differing beliefs must have room to coexist,” ADF’s senior counsel Kristen Waggoner said in a statement. “It’s wrong for the state to force any citizen to support a particular view about marriage or anything else against their will. Freedom of speech and religion aren’t subject to the whim of a majority; they are constitutional guarantees.”…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSA Case Study

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the case for APUSA V STATE OF CALIFORNIA, All People of United States argue that tax funds are being distribute to non-profit religious organizations, which violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The First Amendment states…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    cantwell v connecticut

    • 704 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the freedoms protected by law in the United States is the right to choose and speak about one’s religious beliefs. The first amendment of the U.S Constitution protects this freedom by preventing congress from passing any laws that prohibit, or ban, the “Free exercise” of religion. This portion of the first amendment is called the free exercise clause. This is a very important and beneficial right to everyone. This essay will illustrate how the Cantwell V. Connecticut case impacted American law.…

    • 704 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article titled " Hobby Lobby Ruling Much More than Abortion" discusses the supreme court ruling regarding abortion and birth control. The author expressed that family owned businesses have been ruled in court to opt out of the federal requirement to pay for birth control in health coverage for their workers. The family owned business did not feel it was fair to follow the recent mandate by President Obama regarding contraceptives. Hobby Lobby was targeted by social media for being unfair and not giving freedom a chance based on their religious beliefs. Several people backing Hobby Lobby's philosophies stated they do not force people to work there. If a person chooses to not abide by Hobby Lobby's belief's, they do not have to choose…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Washington DC – -(Ammoland.com)- For decades, gun-grabbers have been using the “gun show loophole” to push their gun control agenda.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roe Vs Wade Case

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page

    The precedent of Roe v. Wade has been challenged on a number of occasions and the Supreme Court has reaffirmed the decision based on stare decisis. One of the primary purposes of stare decisis is that it ensures impartiality and "if the law on a subject is well settled, someone bringing a case can usually rely on the court to rule based on what the law has been in the past" (Cross & Miller, 2016, pg. 27). I also think of settled law in terms of being a parent and the important decisions I make to ensure the safety of my children. Once a decision has been made in the best interest of my children, it becomes a rule and is considered settled law in my household. If need be, I will revisit those decisions and apply them to similar situations…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The law should not determine what is right and what is wrong. Just because abortion is legal, doesn't mean it's right. As P. Ramsey stated, "Not everything that is legal is right...and nothing that is right is right because it is legal" (Day 55). Abortion should also not be considered right because it has been determined legal. Dean Stein, the father of four, and a pro-life advocate explained his beliefs on abortion (Day 79). He states, "My father was born and raised in Romania, and when Hitler came in in the Holocaust, there were Christians who risked their lives to smuggle him [my father] and his family out of Romania when it was legal to kill him just because he was a Jew," he goes on, "...in the same way the Jews were killed just for being Jews, now babies are killed just for being babies" (Day 79). Just because abortion is "painless" to the baby, doesn't mean it's right. In the United States, we don't allow people to kill innocent human beings, even if the death or killing is painless or not known by the victim (Day 80). Abortion should not be considered anything less than murder. Murder stops a beating heart. Abortion stops a beating heart and stops one 4000 times a day (Day 82). Religion…

    • 1360 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays