Preview

Hobby Lobby Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
108 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hobby Lobby Case Study
I've always been baffled when Christian owned companies such as Hobby Lobby, Chick-Fil-A, and 7-11-(Oklahoma locations) allow their opinions to interfere with business. For instance, you may recall Hobby Lobby and their opposition to providing health insurance that covered plan b, Ella, or UID's. It put Hobby Lobby under extreme scrutiny that their case had to appear before the supreme court. But, the strong beliefs of these companies have also worked in their favor as they are known as reputable employers who offer great pay, benefits, and exceptional customer service. It's a classic case of a double edged sword and it may not be ideal but it

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hobby Lobby. This case centered around a portion of the Affordable Care Act that required employers to cover certain FDA-approved contraceptives. The owners of Hobby Lobby, the Greene family, are devout Christians and felt that they could not do this due to religious freedom. The court ruled that forcing them to cover contraceptives violated their beliefs, and they could not be forced to comply. Justice Alito claimed that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act applied to corporations, and forcing Hobby Lobby to comply was burdening them. Ginsburg replied to this with a 35-page dissent paper and forced it to be delivered to the press. The opening line to her set the tone for the entire paper “[i]n a decision of startling breadth, the Court holds that commercial enterprises, including corporations, along with partnerships and sole proprietorships, can opt out of any law (saving only tax laws) they judge incompatible with their sincerely held religious beliefs.” (Ginsburg…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Billy is a Co-founder and Executive Director of Lobbyists 4 Good. Prior to starting Lobbyists 4 Good, he was advocating for clean drinking water around the world and has help Public Affairs positions in government and the private sector. His hopes lawmakers will learn the art of compromising and go back to putting country above party.…

    • 56 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Matthew is planning to open a manufacturing facility and is considering a “Christian-only” hiring policy. The only way that this policy would be legal is if the manufacturing facility was considered to be a non-profit organization. A non-profit organization is an organization that uses surplus revenues to achieve its goals rather than distributing them as profit or dividends. The extent to which a non-profit organization can generate surplus revenues may be constrained or use of surplus revenues may be restricted. If this manufacturing facility was deemed to be a non-profit organization, then the organization would be exempt from the Civil Rights Act and would be able to implement their “Christian-only” hiring policy without facing charges down the road of discrimination. Due to the fact that a manufacturing facility would be unable to be classified as a non-profit organization because their purpose is usually to distribute its products for profit, then my advice would be that this policy would not be advisable for Matthew to use a “Christian-only” hiring policy. Using this policy would cause people to be discriminated against due to religious preference, and this is clearly illegal in the United States. If Matthew was planning to open a Christian school rather than a manufacturing facility, my answer would still be that it is illegal to discriminate in a for-profit…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma and filed a lawsuit. The district court denied Hobby Lobby’s request for a preliminary injunction. In March 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit allowed a hearing of the case. In June the appeals court sided with Hobby Lobby and said that a company had the same rights of a person and could restrict women’s access to contraception on religious grounds. In September the US appealed to the US Supreme Court.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Hobby Lobby is a family owned arts and crafts store that runs on Christian principles. The companies statement of purpose is “honoring the Lord in all [they] do by operating the company in a manner consistent with Biblical principles.” The family does not believe in the use of contraception but under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), the company is required to offer a minimum coverage health care plan that includes forms of contraception. The plaintiffs filed suit to challenge the requirement to provide contraceptive method to their employees under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), the First Amendment (Free Exercise…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I completely agree with the opinion that the Hobby Lobby case is justified. The new interpretation that religion can also pertain to private corporations due to the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. This allows for Hobby Lobby to deny birth control to employees. However, as many have stated before, the employees’ individual rights to birth control have to be respected as well. Just because the corporation itself does not believe in the birth control, this does not mean the corporation can ignore the workers’ rights to have birth control. Thus, I believe that Hobby Lobby is able to defer birth control payments to the federal government because employees that seek birth control are still able to receive it. However, in recitations,…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court case, Zubik v. Burwll is aimed to answer multiple questions. The first question this case aims to answer is does the availability of a regulatory exemption for religious employers regarding the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate eliminate the substantial burden on those organizations’ exercise of their religious freedom? The second question this case will answer is do the Department of Health and Human Services’ guidelines satisfy the Religious Freedom Restoration Act’s demanding test for overriding religious objections? Last, the third question this court will answer is do the Department of Health and Human Services’ guidelines violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act when the government has not proven that the guidelines…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    She believes that the Hobby Lobby case and the decision will open up more corporations to “opt out of any law” (Ginsburg, 2014). That allows the people behind the corporation also known as the owners could potentially harm the workers. Ruth Ginsburg states that the key difference between for-profit and nonprofit corporations is that non-profit corporations can claim to be a unified community, while for-profit corporations will vary in views and needs from the owners and the employees. That the religious objections against certain protections could harm their employees by not giving them the healthcare protection they need that is protected under ACA. Things that could be taken away from workers that are very important for someone’s well being is blood transfusions, vaccines, and pills with gelatin coating; all of these things could offend the Jehovah’s Witness, Christian Scientists, Muslims, Jews, and Hindus (Oyez,…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hooby Lobby

    • 971 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Petitioners: The corporations in question here are not “person’s exercising religion.” Under the Religious freedom Restoration Act, Hobby Lobby and Mardel are not exempt from complying with a generally applicable law. These laws, in general, regulate the corporations, not the individual owners. The Green’s as “individuals” are allowed to make decisions for themselves based on RFRA, but any decision made for the entire corporation based on these rights cannot validate an injunction. While the corporations are run through religious practices, at root, denying these federal statutes would deny thousands of employees the access to benefits that could prove to be of great importance to health and wellness. As individual “person’s” you are allowed religious freedom, which is protected, but a person cannot make decisions for a mass community or in this case employees.…

    • 971 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As the Supreme Court has ruled against the ObamaCare mandate recently, commonly referred as the The Affordable Care Act (ACA), many of the religious communities are overwhelmed about the decision and take it as a victory whereas others are outraged about this situation as women community will be greatly affected by the rulings of the court. It is a setback for the women society that in the name of religious liberty they will be deprived of their medical concerned issues. The companies that consist of religious ideology will be able to legitimize something that may harm others. Certainly these events will have constant series of effects on the society and as well as some changes may also occur in the legislation relating to ObamaCare. Obamacare covers twenty types of birth control, upon four of them; the court has objected (Tom Cohen, 2014).…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobby Lobby has followed their religious beliefs since becoming a business many years ago. A person is not forced to work at hobby lobby. Therefore, they are not forced to utilize the insurance policy offered. If you are a female and know you will need to purchase contraceptives, do not apply at hobby lobby. One way to get around the fact you will not have birth control through Hobby Lobby paid for by the insurance, is passing the Obama care idea of having a choice of insurance outside of your employer's. If the government passed the law to give employees a choice, there would be no problem for people who do not follow the religious views of Hobby Lobby. The fact is, there are many things happening in the world today that are blinding to many religious cultures. In the United States, we live in a free country. People should be free to believe what religion they believe in. People have the choice to be gay if they wish. But neither one should be allowed to interfere with one another's belief. If you do not like how someone stands with their belief's, simply move on and go the other direction. Hobby Lobby should not have to change their belief because times have…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the Act the hospital is allowed to deny treatment to patients if it goes against the hospitals religious belief. The appellee may also argue that they are protected under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, that prohibits any agency department, or official of the United States or any State from substantially burdening a person’s exercise of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability. In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, 573 US__(2014), the Court held that corporations are protected under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The Court also concluded that providing contraceptives forces religious corporations to fund what they consider abortion, which goes against their stated religious principles, and creates a substantial burden that is not the least restrictive method of satisfying the government’s…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with my finding that it doesn’t cause abortion, but what it does do is become a protective barrier between eggs and any sperm that inserts the vagina. If Hobby Lobby wants to makes these allegations that certain methods are causing abortion, then they should take their own money and do the research instead of basing it on religion and assumptions. By using the Rights-Based theory, it states in the second condition that an action is acceptable if in certain cases where everyone’s rights cannot be upheld, an action must protect the important ones. Under this, in the decision of Hobby Lobby, I would believe that the right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness and safety is more important than expressing one’s religion. In addition,…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason this article is lacking is because Will twists the 1977 decision in Wooley v. Maynard to fit his argument when it doesn’t apply to the situation at hand in the least (Will). Wooley v. Maynard was a case of a private citizen not having to be forced by the government to promote a message on his personal property that went against his beliefs, not a public company discriminating against a particular group of citizens because of the owner’s religious beliefs (Wooley v.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Dilemmas

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Go to pages 202-203 to read about "Corporate Moral Agency" and the 2010 Supreme Court ruling giving corporations First Amendment rights. As you know, the First Amendment gives us, among other rights, the freedom of speech. Although corporations had limited “personhood” rights prior to the 2010 decision, now they have rights indistinguishable from individual citizens. Justice Roberts believes that “a corporation, just like an individual, has many diverse interests…indistinguishable from the individual who owns them.”…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays