Preview

Holberg & Company Case Brief Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
652 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Holberg & Company Case Brief Summary
Holberg & Company, the defendant, had a working business agreement with Citizens National Assurance Company (CNAC), the plaintiff. Owned and operated by Robert E. Holberg, Holberg & Co. is an unincorporated sole proprietorship. Holberg seeked out clients to sell insurance through CNAC for which he collected commission on the sale. To establish this practice between the two companies, CNAC drafted a contract detailing the appropriate conduct, commission rates, etc.
During a transaction, CNAC observed that Holberg had breached the contract and as a result decided to sue. CNAC and Holberg presented the contract between them to the trial court of Houston, Texas. CNAC pointed out the provision Holberg had breached, and though Holberg attempted to refute the claims, it was clear and apparent the contract had been violated. After careful review by the trial court, the judge awarded CNAC $94,304.79 as well as the additional expenditures accumulated as a result of the trial.
The initial decision dealt with just the two companies, excluding Holberg individually. Before the case was closed, while motions could still be placed into action, the plaintiff requested to modify the
…show more content…
Article 6135 states that “In suits by or against unincorporated companies, whatever judgment shall be rendered shall be as conclusive on the individual stockholders and members thereof as if they were individually parties to such suits.” This information itself revealed that the trial court was justified in its decision. Article 6137 further enhanced the argument in stating: "service of citation may also be had on any and all of the stockholders ... and [judgment] shall be equally binding upon the individual property of the stockholders…" Both of the supporting articles set precedence that reinforced the argument that Holberg, as the sole stockholder, was bound by the judgment of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the Corn Products Refining Co. case, the company had purchased corn futures in order to ensure that the corn needed for operations could be obtained in times of shortage or raising prices, without the need to worry about storage capacity limitations. The company reported the gain or loss on the futures as ordinary income and losses in 1940 and 1942, however the company later argued that the futures should be classified as a capital asset, subjecting the gain and losses incurred to Section 117 (Section 1211). The company looked to justify this shift in treatment by stating that the purchase and sale of these futures was a separate and distinct activity from the manufacturing operations of the firm, rather than hedges for the business. The…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Darlene Jespersen was a bartender at Harrah’s Casino in Reno in the sports bar. She was frequently praised by her supervisors and customers for being an outstanding employee. When Jespersen first started her job at Harrah’s the female bartenders were not required to wear makeup but were encouraged to. Jespersen tried to wear makeup to work a few times but decided that she did not like it due to the fact it made her feel sick, degraded, exposed and violated. She also believed that it interfered with her ability to deal with unruly customers because it “took away [her] credibility…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plaintiff Wendling

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Plaintiff Wendling was originally awarded damages for the breach of an oral contract for the purchase and sale of cattle to the Defendants Puls and Watson by the Harvey District Court; which the Defendants turned around and later appealed. Both of the Defendants argued that the oral contract was unenforceable by law and the damages were also not calculated correctly.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief No 1

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Facts: In year 2000, Narnia Investments, Ltd. sued Harvestons Securities, Inc. and several defendants in trial court of Texas. The trial court then granted a default judgment against Harvestons and in favor of Narnia that Harvestons has to pay $365,000, plus attorney’s fees, prejudgment interest, and postjudgment interest. Harvestons claimed that it had no actual knowledge of the pending litigation before November 15, 2004 and filed a timely restricted appeal. Harvestons contends that the service of process was defective due to the process was delivered to someone different than the one name in the citation, the person to which the process was delivered, JoAnn Kocerek, did not have a authority to accept the process on behalf of Harvestons or the Texas Securities Commissioner and the return of service does not show a valid manner of service. At last, the appellate court of Texas reverse the trial court’s default judgment and remand this case for further proceedings.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Currently, I am employed at Massood Law Group. The firm represents plaintiff and injured workers, but primarily focuses on representation of surgeons, medical facilities, and hospitals in No Fault (PIP) and Workers’ Compensation claims. My responsibilities and duties include educating and advocating on our clients behalf in workers’ compensation courts and associating in personal injury actions. With respect to the workers’ compensation field, I am able to take a case from the initial filing process to competition both for the injured worker and medical provider. I also researched and drafted pleadings, motions, and other legal documents necessary to resolve the case.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plaintiff, Margaret Hollar was not employed at the time of the accident in question. The plaintiff had a history of having an L4-S1 discectomy and laminectomy. Ms. Hollar testified that she had a history of severe headaches, which began when she was 20 years of age. The plaintiff was involved in an accident in 2001 in which she slipped on ice and injured her neck and back. That injury led to her back surgery, as a result of her chronic back pain she was unable to return to work. The plaintiff has a history of severe depression and anxiety and inpatient psychiatric treatment.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dave Sharland – Mr. Sharland a physical therapist for the North Florida/South Georgia Veteran’s Administration (VA) reported that during his career, he has participated in over 800 physical therapy visits in home settings and been very positive. The Council questioned Mr. Sharland on licensure requirements, technical platform, types of services offered, and patient and patient representative access to services. Mr. Sharland to explain the health care providers working with the VA are only required to obtain a license in one state, but they are limited to providing services to only VA patients. He noted that that necessary technology is sometimes provided directly to patients and that in other instances the patient is responsible for purchasing…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Spot check was for the purposes of checking licenses, insurance, mechanical fitness of cars sobriety of the drivers.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Describe clearly the accounting changes Harnischfeger made in 1984 as stated in Note 2 of its financial statements…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plaintiff, Stambovsky, sued to have the contract canceled. The trial court ruled in favor of Ackley.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS Rumarson Technologies, Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24,965 owed to it by Event Marketing, Inc. (EMI) when EMI's check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI's corporate account, and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower court agreed and ruled in favor of RTI holding the Helmers liable. The Helmers appealed. Also of note, is that check was dated 1998 although there is some non-material dispute as to whether it was August 14, 1998, or on or around July 13, 1998.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Traco vs Arrow

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After a bench trial, the trial court held for Arrow solely under the theory of promissory estoppel and awarded Arrow judgment against Traco for damages in the amount of $ 75,843.38, plus attorneys' fees and prejudgment interest.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This case is about Robert Allen who was trying to sell Bayfield a Drive system to work with a shearing line that they had recently purchased from Mangna Machinery. Allen lost the sale and was reviewing his call reports to see where he went wrong. The Exhibits shows that Allen did certain thing right, and he could’ve done more to keep the sale and to seal the deal so to speak. According to the text Allen built a good relationship with the engineers and the decision makers at the plant. He also contacted Magna and got the specifications for the shearing line, which was good move so they can tailor a custom system to better fit the shearling line. However, could’ve used that contact at Magna and involved them more in the process. Perhaps build and alliance with them and have them declare Lawford as a preferred partner.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The facts disclosed that in 1954, Mr. Lee had formed the respondent company carrying on…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plaintiff prayed to the court for an injunction to restrain the second defendant from continuing to take part in the management of the company and that the transfer to Ho Kum Chen, and subsequently to the first defendant was void because it did not comply with art 34A of the company's articles of association.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays