Homeland Security Dichotomy

The primary purpose of this essay is to critique the United States homeland security system and its capabilities to meet both the new issues and future challenges. Besides, this exposition will address and analyze the existing efforts of apparent dichotomy that are crucial to homeland security on one hand while maintaining civil liberties on the other side.
From my opinion point of view, the homeland security achieves these objectives through a variety of ways including the processes it employs to secure the internal parts of the United States unlike when compared to the Homeland Defense that sees into it that external security is fostered. Another way is that the spirit of teamwork that has been laid between different levels of governments
has ensured that the NCTC and IC have put a firm and efficient manner to curb the large mass causality events. Indeed, this is how these governments have managed to collaborate and work together in a seamless and transparent way.
From the above illustrations, it can be denoted that the Intelligence Community to date has all along been a better option that helps in predicting and forecasting the future challenges affecting the homeland security. This is whyTherefore, the useful Constitutional guidelines, as well as strict regulations, do exist to ensure that action of international and domestic terrorists have been brought to a stand-still. Additionally, (James & Palgrave Connect (Online service), 2013) depicts that risk mitigation strategy has been exhaustively employed in Defense Department to ensure that the homeland security events are dealt with accordingly. And as per what the DoD internal directives stipulates, in any case, be it associated with the natural disaster or even an emergency, the resources set in place by the state to handle and contain the situation must be utilized overwhelmingly.
Additionally, when the military operations of the non-MSCA happen to take precedence, lots of the DoD resources are provided particularly when the civil authorities’ capabilities have gone beyond the recovery requirements (James & Palgrave Connect (Online service), 2013). And regarding the threats from the continued homeland security, there is a prove that these risks are posed from the individual's malicious intents especially with the fact that the threats can be grouped into two broad categories namely; Human Caused Threat and the Accidental or Technological Threat.
And as a matter of fact, the events related to both accident and natural threats continue to happen since in most situations we as human beings have no control over these sets of events. But regarding to what (Johnson, 2010) says, the Human Terrorism is indeed one of the threats which can be easily overcome if vigilance in a civilized society such as this of the United States is enhanced and fostered to eradicate all those who try to threaten or harm the homeland security through their criminal actions.
FurthermoreFurthermore, and in respect to the critical infrastructural threats, (Johnson, 2010) says that in harmony and synergy, people have been networking together purposely to help each other in forecasting the future vulnerabilities to attacks.
Thus, three components here apply when it comes to joining hands, in that the factors related to homeland security are somehow a teamwork or collective process. The three components entail cyber, human beings and physical things which when combined, a sound solution to the threats problems will be found. But for all these three components to dwell adequately there is a need for sufficient power and leadership from the various governmental
sectors.
The goals and objectives of the homeland security and in relationship to the national and missionsmission’s departments have had a good source of intelligence through the fusion centers as well as the support they get from the ITACG (Johnson, 2010). Bearing this in mind, (Nakaya, 2005) keeps on to say that the homeland security is set to continue promoting the broader understanding of the threats by ensuring that the intelligence analysis experts are performing their mandated roles and duties. One of these roles is the provision of relevant analysis to partners that have the intention of addressing high-priority issues.
In addition, other functions include collecting information as well as intelligence analysis on homeland security issues, promoting and managing the homeland security workforce that will in return help in containing the homeland security enterprise.
Also, (Nakaya, 2005) denotes that the same is entitled to share information that will standardize the policies of sharing the information within all the levels of the government.
Equally important, as we all understand that the government of the United States is mandated to strike a balance between the civil liberties and overall security, some of the Acts such as that called PATRIOT Act are supposed to ensure that the future challenges that will face the homeland security will have tomust provide a secure air transportation system (Nakaya, 2005). This is because PATRIOT Act will offer the best way to go alongside other existing laws in the United States. When such laws are in action, it is the function of the Civil Authorities to see into it that the same laws are not abused in any way.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the essay had indeed attempted to critique that homeland capability in enhancing the homeland security to the United States. This is primarily to analyze whether the system is capable of meeting and forecasting the emergent future challenges in the country. Besides, the paper addressed the apparent dichotomy that aims at putting the efforts of not only providing homeland security but maintaining civil liberties as well. From this point of view, it is clear that thethe Homeland Security challenges will continue to evolve just like what is seen in the enemy side which is also continuing to crop so that the country will enact intriguing strategies to keep the country safe.