Homeopathic Persuasive Letter

Dear Ms Sanderling, I heard your interview with Dr Schinkl today and felt to respond. You did a very pleasing job with the good open ended questions you asked Schinkl.
I believe homeopathic can be beneficial, firstly because as Schinkl an expert that has cured lots of sickness; mentioned millions of patients have been really pleased with the results. Homeopathic medicines have been believed to improve health conditions that other professional expertise has signed off as irredeemable. Secondly, latest medical cures cannot always cure all illness, in addition these medicines have damaging results may also be addictive but it isn’t true for homeopathic. In that case why not try the alternate, homeopathic.
However this medicine may have flaws
and may not be as good as Schinkl believes. Firstly this type of medicine remains debatable, suggesting unless it has something bad about it might be trusted by the whole community. Secondly, this medicine was proved to exist in times of lack of education and technology; meaning this can’t assure it benefits. Furthermore, it is very costly compared to latest and modern medicines that have been developed on reasonable theories and satisfying expertise and technology.
Moreover I think this substitute medicine might do good as the theoretically base of the development is from the diseases itself. The fact that it has been around for centuries might indeed be advantageous because if it was unsafe it would have declined instead of becoming more popular. Even though this information was given to us by a Doctor that might not be telling the truth but by the information and results he told us about the consumers’ perspective in particular points out there is no harm in trying it.
Yours Sincerely