Preview

Hostile Takeover

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
917 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hostile Takeover
Hostile takeover
Hostile takeover is a takeover of a company, which goes against the wishes of the company's management and board of directors. It is the opposite of friendly takeover

A hostile takeover is a type of corporate takeover which is carried out against the wishes of the board of the target company. This unique type of acquisition does not occur nearly as frequently as friendly takeovers, in which the two companies work together because the takeover is perceived as beneficial. Hostile takeovers can be traumatic for the target company, and they can also be risky for the other side, as the acquiring company may not be able to obtain certain relevant information about the target company.

Companies are bought and sold on a daily basis. There are two types of sale agreements. In the first, a merger, two companies come together, blending their assets, staff, facilities, and so forth. After a merger, the original companies cease to exist, and a new company arises instead. In a takeover, a company is purchased by another company. The purchasing company owns all of the target company's assets including company patents, trademarks, and so forth. The original company may be entirely swallowed up, or may operate semi-independently under the umbrella of the acquiring company.

Typically, a company which wishes to acquire another company approaches the target company's board with an offer. The board members consider the offer, and then choose to accept or reject it. The offer will be accepted if the board believes that it will promote the long term welfare of the company, and it will be rejected if the board dislikes the terms or it feels that a takeover would not be beneficial. When a company pursues takeover after rejection by a board, it is a hostile takeover. If a company bypasses the board entirely, it is also termed a hostile takeover.

Publicly traded companies are at risk of hostile takeover because opposing companies can purchase large amounts of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    finance manamgement

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The hostility is between managements and boards of directors. The target's stockholders are generally only interested in the return on their investments. Therefore if an acquiring company offers a hefty premium, they're nothing but pleased.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which of the following is NOT normally regarded as being a barrier to hostile takeovers? (Points : 5)…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elecriccity and Magnatism

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A hostile takeover defense wherein the target firm makes its stock less attractive to a potential acquirer is called…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    M&a Exam Review

    • 2985 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Either another corporation or group of individuals can acquire the target firm, or the target firm can merge with another firm.…

    • 2985 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capitaliq Tutorial

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    • Acquires company for strategic reasons (access new markets, synergies, growth, etc.) • Done by firms in similar operating industries • Will pay a control premium for target firm…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    International Mergers

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The difference in merger practices between U.S. companies & companies in other countries is, mergers by form of hostile takeovers or any form of takeovers, is virtually nonexistent or uncommon (Gitman & Zutter 2012). The U.S.’s emphasis on shareholder value and relying on public capital markets for financing are also a few practices generally not shared by companies in continental Europe. Gitman & Zutter (2012) also state that the U.S. approach isn’t the norm in Japan and other Asian nations either. “Both European and Japanese companies have been active as acquirers of U.S. companies in recent years” (Gitman & Zutter 2012 pg.736). Historically the British have been the most active acquirers of U.S. firms, with…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    US History

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Living things that are well adapted to their environment survive and reproduce. Those that are not well adapted don’t survive and reproduce. Any inherited trait that increases an organism’s ability to survive is called an adaptation. Remember that these adaptations are inherited traits; they are not changes that an individual chooses to make and that increases fitness, which is defined as the ability to survive and reproduce.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With newly issued M&A regulations and laws, foreign enterprises have more alternatives to acquire domestic corporations. They are starting to use mergers and acquisitions in the same way that they do elsewhere. However, many factors exist to discourage foreign firms from fully utilizing the advantages, such as poor standards of corporate governance, inadequate due diligence process and evaluation matters.…

    • 9316 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unfriendly (hostile) combination: A company resists being acquired but the acquiring company still pursues the combination…

    • 3145 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a firm acquires another entity, there usually is a predictable short-term effect on the stock price of both companies. In general, the acquiring company's stock will fall while the target company's stock will rise. The reason the target company's stock usually goes up is that the acquiring company typically has to pay a premium for the acquisition: unless the acquiring company offers more per share than the current price of the target company's stock, there is little incentive for the current owners of the target to sell their shares to the takeover company.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hostile Takeover

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A hostile takeover typically involves an insurgent group, known as a ‘raider’, who makes a tender offer to buy a controlling block of stock in a target corporation from its present shareholders. The price is generally at a premium. If enough of the current shareholders take the offer, the insurgent group receives a controlling interest at which time the “raider” fires the current management and makes additional changes to the company. The insurgent group’s responsibility is then to add value to show the premium paid for the company’s stock was a smart investment.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Combination

    • 2508 Words
    • 11 Pages

    one company’s ownership interest in another gives it control of the acquired company, yet the acquiring company does not have a majority ownership in the acquired. Typically, this is in the 20%-50% interest range.…

    • 2508 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Giving Up Privacy

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Privacy has been a controversial topic since the humanity began to develop the civilization and live individually or in a small group as family instead of in a big group of population inside a huge cave. Basically, privacy is a seclusion of one’s information or existence from public. The motion of privacy is described as an action of hiding something or keeping something secret, but it is still debatable whether privacy is achieved when either someone is being alone in a certain limited space or when someone is not being paid attention even though they are in a crowd or both. Nowadays the boundary of privacy is not so clear anymore with the developing technology and civilization. A lot of techniques to maintain the balance of our society lifestyle are claimed to be indirectly invading people’s privacy such as using surveillance camera in almost every corner of public places for security purposes or companies gathering personal data and storing them for marketing purposes. In “Privacy is Overated” by David Plotz and “Smile, You’re on Security Camera” by John McElhenny in “What Matters in America” book by Gary Goshgarian, it is stated that people are uncomfortable with companies and officials actions which they feel have invaded their privacy such as setting up security cameras and saving personal records, but in fact, those things are proved to be able to bring good impacts for the society. The current situation shows how today’s society is not able to live happily and conveniently without giving up its privacy and thus, it is necessary to violate privacy to a certain extent in order to maintain social and cultural balance, and as the invasion of privacy that happens these days has not gone over the boundary, it explicitly helps us in living our life.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Student

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are two basic types of mergers, cash mergers and stock mergers. In a cash merger, the acquiring company offers to exchange cash for the target company’s equity or assets. In a stock merger, the acquirer offers its common stock instead of cash.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    when and why takeovers are initiated, and why target managers oppose or acquiesce to such…

    • 2609 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays